局部蒸发冷却解释了观察到的眼表温度模式。

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Young Hyun Kim, Joshua Lee, Sarah M Yi, Meng C Lin, Clayton J Radke
{"title":"局部蒸发冷却解释了观察到的眼表温度模式。","authors":"Young Hyun Kim, Joshua Lee, Sarah M Yi, Meng C Lin, Clayton J Radke","doi":"10.1167/iovs.65.10.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We determined interblink corneal surface-temperature decline and tear-film evaporation rates of localized tear breakup cold regions (LCRs) and localized tear unbroken warm regions (LWRs) of the corneal surface, as well as that of the overall average corneal surface.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Each subject underwent 4 inter-day visits where the interblink corneal surface-temperature history of the right eye was measured using a FLIR A655sc infrared thermographer. Corneal surface temperature history was analyzed to determine the overall, LCR, and LWR temperature-decline rates. Evaporation rates of LCR and LWR regions were determined from the measured LCR and LWR temperature data using the physical model of Dursch et al.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty subjects completed the study. Mean (SD) difference of LCR temperature-decline rate was -0.08 (0.07)°C/s faster than LWR (P < 0.0001). Similarly, evaporation rates of LCR and LWR were statistically different (P < 0.0001). At ambient temperature, mean LCR and LWR evaporation rates were 76% and 27% of pure water evaporation flux, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the inter-day measured temperature-decline rates and the interblink starting temperature.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Significant differences in corneal temperature-decline rate and evaporation rate between LCR and LWR were quantified using infrared thermography. In agreement with literature, LCRs and LWRs correlate directly with fluorescein break-up areas and unbroken tear areas, respectively. Because lipid-evaporation protection is diminished in breakup areas, higher local evaporation rates and faster local cooling rates occur in LCRs relative to LWRs. Our results confirm this phenomenon clinically for the first time.</p>","PeriodicalId":14620,"journal":{"name":"Investigative ophthalmology & visual science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11314627/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Localized Evaporative Cooling Explains Observed Ocular Surface-Temperature Patterns.\",\"authors\":\"Young Hyun Kim, Joshua Lee, Sarah M Yi, Meng C Lin, Clayton J Radke\",\"doi\":\"10.1167/iovs.65.10.15\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We determined interblink corneal surface-temperature decline and tear-film evaporation rates of localized tear breakup cold regions (LCRs) and localized tear unbroken warm regions (LWRs) of the corneal surface, as well as that of the overall average corneal surface.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Each subject underwent 4 inter-day visits where the interblink corneal surface-temperature history of the right eye was measured using a FLIR A655sc infrared thermographer. Corneal surface temperature history was analyzed to determine the overall, LCR, and LWR temperature-decline rates. Evaporation rates of LCR and LWR regions were determined from the measured LCR and LWR temperature data using the physical model of Dursch et al.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty subjects completed the study. Mean (SD) difference of LCR temperature-decline rate was -0.08 (0.07)°C/s faster than LWR (P < 0.0001). Similarly, evaporation rates of LCR and LWR were statistically different (P < 0.0001). At ambient temperature, mean LCR and LWR evaporation rates were 76% and 27% of pure water evaporation flux, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the inter-day measured temperature-decline rates and the interblink starting temperature.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Significant differences in corneal temperature-decline rate and evaporation rate between LCR and LWR were quantified using infrared thermography. In agreement with literature, LCRs and LWRs correlate directly with fluorescein break-up areas and unbroken tear areas, respectively. Because lipid-evaporation protection is diminished in breakup areas, higher local evaporation rates and faster local cooling rates occur in LCRs relative to LWRs. Our results confirm this phenomenon clinically for the first time.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14620,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Investigative ophthalmology & visual science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11314627/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Investigative ophthalmology & visual science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.65.10.15\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigative ophthalmology & visual science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.65.10.15","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们测定了角膜表面局部泪液破裂冷区(LCRs)和局部泪液未破裂热区(LWRs)以及整体平均角膜表面的交联角膜表面温度下降率和泪膜蒸发率:每个受试者接受 4 次跨天访问,使用 FLIR A655sc 红外测温仪测量右眼眨眼间的角膜表面温度历史。对角膜表面温度历史进行分析,以确定总体、LCR 和 LWR 温度下降率。根据测得的 LCR 和 LWR 温度数据,使用 Dursch 等人的物理模型确定 LCR 和 LWR 区域的蒸发率:20 名受试者完成了研究。LCR 温度下降率的平均(标度)差值为 -0.08 (0.07)°C/s ,快于 LWR(P < 0.0001)。同样,LCR 和 LWR 的蒸发率也存在统计学差异(P < 0.0001)。在环境温度下,LCR 和 LWR 的平均蒸发率分别是纯水蒸发通量的 76% 和 27%。日间测得的温度下降率与链接间起始温度之间没有明显的统计学差异:结论:使用红外热成像技术量化了 LCR 和 LWR 角膜温度下降率和蒸发率的显著差异。与文献一致,LCR 和 LWR 分别与荧光素破裂面积和未破裂泪液面积直接相关。由于破裂区域的脂质蒸发保护作用减弱,因此相对于 LWR,LCR 的局部蒸发率更高,局部冷却速度更快。我们的研究结果首次在临床上证实了这一现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Localized Evaporative Cooling Explains Observed Ocular Surface-Temperature Patterns.

Purpose: We determined interblink corneal surface-temperature decline and tear-film evaporation rates of localized tear breakup cold regions (LCRs) and localized tear unbroken warm regions (LWRs) of the corneal surface, as well as that of the overall average corneal surface.

Methods: Each subject underwent 4 inter-day visits where the interblink corneal surface-temperature history of the right eye was measured using a FLIR A655sc infrared thermographer. Corneal surface temperature history was analyzed to determine the overall, LCR, and LWR temperature-decline rates. Evaporation rates of LCR and LWR regions were determined from the measured LCR and LWR temperature data using the physical model of Dursch et al.

Results: Twenty subjects completed the study. Mean (SD) difference of LCR temperature-decline rate was -0.08 (0.07)°C/s faster than LWR (P < 0.0001). Similarly, evaporation rates of LCR and LWR were statistically different (P < 0.0001). At ambient temperature, mean LCR and LWR evaporation rates were 76% and 27% of pure water evaporation flux, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the inter-day measured temperature-decline rates and the interblink starting temperature.

Conclusions: Significant differences in corneal temperature-decline rate and evaporation rate between LCR and LWR were quantified using infrared thermography. In agreement with literature, LCRs and LWRs correlate directly with fluorescein break-up areas and unbroken tear areas, respectively. Because lipid-evaporation protection is diminished in breakup areas, higher local evaporation rates and faster local cooling rates occur in LCRs relative to LWRs. Our results confirm this phenomenon clinically for the first time.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
339
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science (IOVS), published as ready online, is a peer-reviewed academic journal of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO). IOVS features original research, mostly pertaining to clinical and laboratory ophthalmology and vision research in general.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信