碳稳定同位素比(CIR)作为添加糖摄入量的客观生物标志物:人类营养学现有证据范围综述》。

IF 8 1区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
{"title":"碳稳定同位素比(CIR)作为添加糖摄入量的客观生物标志物:人类营养学现有证据范围综述》。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.advnut.2024.100281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Objective biomarkers of dietary intake are needed to advance nutrition research. The carbon isotope ratio (C<sup>13</sup>/C<sup>12</sup>; CIR) holds promise as an objective biomarker of added sugar (AS) and sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) intake. This systematic scoping review presents the current evidence on CIRs from human studies. Search results (through April 12, 2024) yielded 6297 studies and 24 final articles. Studies were observational (<em>n</em> = 12), controlled feeding (<em>n</em> = 10), or dietary interventions (<em>n</em> = 2). CIRs were sampled from blood (<em>n</em> = 23), hair (<em>n</em> = 5), breath (<em>n</em> = 2), and/or adipose tissue (<em>n</em> = 1). Most (<em>n</em> = 17) conducted whole tissue (that is, bulk) analysis, 8 used compound specific isotope analysis (CSIA), and/or 2 studies used methods appropriate for analyzing breath. Studies were conducted in 3 concentrated geographic regions of the United States (<em>n</em> = 7 Virginia; <em>n</em> = 5 Arizona; <em>n</em> = 4 Alaska), with only 2 studies conducted in other countries. Studies that used CSIA to examine the CIR from the amino acid alanine (CIR-Ala; <em>n</em> = 4) and CIR analyzed from breath (<em>n</em> = 2) provided the most robust evidence for CIR as an objective biomarker of AS and SSBs (<em>R</em><sup>2</sup> range 0.36–0.91). Studies using bulk analysis of hair or blood showed positive, but modest and more variable associations with AS and SSBs (<em>R</em><sup>2</sup> range 0.05–0.48). Few studies showed no association, particularly in non-United States populations and those with low AS and SSB intakes. Two studies provided evidence for CIR to detect changes in SSB intake in response to dietary interventions. Overall, the most compelling evidence supports CIR-Ala as an objective indicator of AS intake and breath CIR as an indicator of short-term AS intake. Considering how to adjust for underlying dietary patterns remains an important area of future work and emerging methods using breath and CSIA warrant additional investigation. More evidence is needed to refine the utility and specificity of CIRs to measure AS and SSB intake.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7349,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Nutrition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2161831324001157/pdfft?md5=3ee75ff60a5fc2c1436520b795265149&pid=1-s2.0-S2161831324001157-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Carbon Isotope Ratio as an Objective Biomarker of Added Sugar Intake: A Scoping Review of Current Evidence in Human Nutrition\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.advnut.2024.100281\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Objective biomarkers of dietary intake are needed to advance nutrition research. The carbon isotope ratio (C<sup>13</sup>/C<sup>12</sup>; CIR) holds promise as an objective biomarker of added sugar (AS) and sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) intake. This systematic scoping review presents the current evidence on CIRs from human studies. Search results (through April 12, 2024) yielded 6297 studies and 24 final articles. Studies were observational (<em>n</em> = 12), controlled feeding (<em>n</em> = 10), or dietary interventions (<em>n</em> = 2). CIRs were sampled from blood (<em>n</em> = 23), hair (<em>n</em> = 5), breath (<em>n</em> = 2), and/or adipose tissue (<em>n</em> = 1). Most (<em>n</em> = 17) conducted whole tissue (that is, bulk) analysis, 8 used compound specific isotope analysis (CSIA), and/or 2 studies used methods appropriate for analyzing breath. Studies were conducted in 3 concentrated geographic regions of the United States (<em>n</em> = 7 Virginia; <em>n</em> = 5 Arizona; <em>n</em> = 4 Alaska), with only 2 studies conducted in other countries. Studies that used CSIA to examine the CIR from the amino acid alanine (CIR-Ala; <em>n</em> = 4) and CIR analyzed from breath (<em>n</em> = 2) provided the most robust evidence for CIR as an objective biomarker of AS and SSBs (<em>R</em><sup>2</sup> range 0.36–0.91). Studies using bulk analysis of hair or blood showed positive, but modest and more variable associations with AS and SSBs (<em>R</em><sup>2</sup> range 0.05–0.48). Few studies showed no association, particularly in non-United States populations and those with low AS and SSB intakes. Two studies provided evidence for CIR to detect changes in SSB intake in response to dietary interventions. Overall, the most compelling evidence supports CIR-Ala as an objective indicator of AS intake and breath CIR as an indicator of short-term AS intake. Considering how to adjust for underlying dietary patterns remains an important area of future work and emerging methods using breath and CSIA warrant additional investigation. More evidence is needed to refine the utility and specificity of CIRs to measure AS and SSB intake.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Nutrition\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2161831324001157/pdfft?md5=3ee75ff60a5fc2c1436520b795265149&pid=1-s2.0-S2161831324001157-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2161831324001157\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2161831324001157","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

推进营养研究需要客观的膳食摄入生物标志物。碳稳定同位素比值(C13/C12;CIR)有望成为添加糖(AS)和含糖饮料(SSB)摄入量的客观生物标志物。本系统性范围综述介绍了目前人类研究中有关 CIR 的证据。搜索结果(截至 2024 年 4 月 12 日)共获得 6297 项研究和 24 篇最终文章。研究为观察性研究(12 篇)、控制喂养研究(10 篇)或膳食干预研究(2 篇)。CIR 取样于血液(23 例)、毛发(5 例)、呼气(2 例)和/或脂肪组织(1 例)。大多数研究(n=17)进行了整体组织(即块状)分析,8 项研究使用了特定化合物同位素分析 (CSIA),和/或 2 项研究使用了适合分析呼气的方法。研究集中在美国的三个地理区域进行(弗吉尼亚州 7 项;亚利桑那州 5 项;阿拉斯加州 4 项),只有两项研究在其他国家进行。使用 CSIA 检测来自非必需氨基酸丙氨酸的 CIR(CIR-Ala;n=4)和来自呼气分析的 CIR(n=2)的研究提供了最有力的证据,证明 CIR 是 AS 和 SSB 的客观生物标志物(R2 范围为 0.36-0.91)。对毛发或血液进行批量分析的研究表明,CIR 与 AS 和 SSB 呈正相关,但相关性不大,且差异较大(R2 范围为 0.05-0.48)。少数研究显示两者之间没有关联,尤其是在非美国人口和 AS 与 SSB 摄入量较低的人群中。有两项研究证明,CIR 可检测膳食干预对 SSB 摄入量的影响。总之,最有说服力的证据支持将 CIR-Ala 作为 AS 摄入量的客观指标,并将呼气 CIR 作为短期 AS 摄入量的指标。考虑如何调整潜在的膳食模式仍然是未来工作的一个重要领域,使用呼气和 CSIA 的新方法值得进一步研究。还需要更多的证据来完善CIRs在测量AS和SSB摄入量方面的实用性和特异性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Carbon Isotope Ratio as an Objective Biomarker of Added Sugar Intake: A Scoping Review of Current Evidence in Human Nutrition

Objective biomarkers of dietary intake are needed to advance nutrition research. The carbon isotope ratio (C13/C12; CIR) holds promise as an objective biomarker of added sugar (AS) and sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) intake. This systematic scoping review presents the current evidence on CIRs from human studies. Search results (through April 12, 2024) yielded 6297 studies and 24 final articles. Studies were observational (n = 12), controlled feeding (n = 10), or dietary interventions (n = 2). CIRs were sampled from blood (n = 23), hair (n = 5), breath (n = 2), and/or adipose tissue (n = 1). Most (n = 17) conducted whole tissue (that is, bulk) analysis, 8 used compound specific isotope analysis (CSIA), and/or 2 studies used methods appropriate for analyzing breath. Studies were conducted in 3 concentrated geographic regions of the United States (n = 7 Virginia; n = 5 Arizona; n = 4 Alaska), with only 2 studies conducted in other countries. Studies that used CSIA to examine the CIR from the amino acid alanine (CIR-Ala; n = 4) and CIR analyzed from breath (n = 2) provided the most robust evidence for CIR as an objective biomarker of AS and SSBs (R2 range 0.36–0.91). Studies using bulk analysis of hair or blood showed positive, but modest and more variable associations with AS and SSBs (R2 range 0.05–0.48). Few studies showed no association, particularly in non-United States populations and those with low AS and SSB intakes. Two studies provided evidence for CIR to detect changes in SSB intake in response to dietary interventions. Overall, the most compelling evidence supports CIR-Ala as an objective indicator of AS intake and breath CIR as an indicator of short-term AS intake. Considering how to adjust for underlying dietary patterns remains an important area of future work and emerging methods using breath and CSIA warrant additional investigation. More evidence is needed to refine the utility and specificity of CIRs to measure AS and SSB intake.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Nutrition
Advances in Nutrition 医学-营养学
CiteScore
17.40
自引率
2.20%
发文量
117
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Advances in Nutrition (AN/Adv Nutr) publishes focused reviews on pivotal findings and recent research across all domains relevant to nutritional scientists and biomedical researchers. This encompasses nutrition-related research spanning biochemical, molecular, and genetic studies using experimental animal models, domestic animals, and human subjects. The journal also emphasizes clinical nutrition, epidemiology and public health, and nutrition education. Review articles concentrate on recent progress rather than broad historical developments. In addition to review articles, AN includes Perspectives, Letters to the Editor, and supplements. Supplement proposals require pre-approval by the editor before submission. The journal features reports and position papers from the American Society for Nutrition, summaries of major government and foundation reports, and Nutrient Information briefs providing crucial details about dietary requirements, food sources, deficiencies, and other essential nutrient information. All submissions with scientific content undergo peer review by the Editors or their designees prior to acceptance for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信