预测幼儿母亲在品味干预中的忠诚度和治疗效果。

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Jessica L. Borelli, Silvia Perzolli, Margaret Kerr, Patricia A. Smiley
{"title":"预测幼儿母亲在品味干预中的忠诚度和治疗效果。","authors":"Jessica L. Borelli,&nbsp;Silvia Perzolli,&nbsp;Margaret Kerr,&nbsp;Patricia A. Smiley","doi":"10.1002/imhj.22130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Savoring impacts parents’ emotions and parent–child relationship quality. Using data from a randomized controlled trial (<i>N</i> = 164 mothers of 18–27-month-olds, 37 interveners) conducted with a community sample in the United States, this study examined predictors of fidelity and treatment outcomes across two savoring preventative interventions (relational savoring and personal savoring). Treatment outcome indicators were selected from a battery administered immediately post-intervention (maternal closeness to child) and at a 3-month follow-up (maternal sensitivity, reflective functioning). We examined whether intervener education level (bachelor's degree/no bachelor's degree) predicted fidelity (Research Question 1), whether intervener education level predicted treatment outcomes (Research Question 2), and whether fidelity predicted treatment outcomes (Research Question 3). In many cases, intervener education background was not related to fidelity or treatment outcome; however, interveners without bachelor's degrees showed greater adherence to the protocols on some scales (higher positivity, higher secure base, higher calm matching) and sessions with these interveners were associated with greater increases in maternal sensitivity. Regardless of the intervener education level, redirecting attention to the positive and calmly matching participants’ tone were associated with higher maternal reflective functioning, and higher secure base scores were associated with greater closeness. Findings have implications for the training and implementation of prevention programs for parents.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/imhj.22130","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting fidelity and treatment outcomes in savoring interventions among mothers of young children\",\"authors\":\"Jessica L. Borelli,&nbsp;Silvia Perzolli,&nbsp;Margaret Kerr,&nbsp;Patricia A. Smiley\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/imhj.22130\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Savoring impacts parents’ emotions and parent–child relationship quality. Using data from a randomized controlled trial (<i>N</i> = 164 mothers of 18–27-month-olds, 37 interveners) conducted with a community sample in the United States, this study examined predictors of fidelity and treatment outcomes across two savoring preventative interventions (relational savoring and personal savoring). Treatment outcome indicators were selected from a battery administered immediately post-intervention (maternal closeness to child) and at a 3-month follow-up (maternal sensitivity, reflective functioning). We examined whether intervener education level (bachelor's degree/no bachelor's degree) predicted fidelity (Research Question 1), whether intervener education level predicted treatment outcomes (Research Question 2), and whether fidelity predicted treatment outcomes (Research Question 3). In many cases, intervener education background was not related to fidelity or treatment outcome; however, interveners without bachelor's degrees showed greater adherence to the protocols on some scales (higher positivity, higher secure base, higher calm matching) and sessions with these interveners were associated with greater increases in maternal sensitivity. Regardless of the intervener education level, redirecting attention to the positive and calmly matching participants’ tone were associated with higher maternal reflective functioning, and higher secure base scores were associated with greater closeness. Findings have implications for the training and implementation of prevention programs for parents.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/imhj.22130\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/imhj.22130\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/imhj.22130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

品味会影响父母的情绪和亲子关系的质量。本研究利用在美国社区样本中进行的随机对照试验(N = 164 位 18-27 个月大孩子的母亲,37 位干预者)的数据,对两种品味预防性干预(关系品味和个人品味)的忠诚度和治疗结果进行了预测。治疗结果指标选自干预后立即进行的测试(母亲与孩子的亲密程度)和 3 个月的随访(母亲的敏感性、反思功能)。我们研究了干预者的教育水平(学士学位/无学士学位)是否能预测忠实度(研究问题 1)、干预者的教育水平是否能预测治疗结果(研究问题 2)以及忠实度是否能预测治疗结果(研究问题 3)。在许多情况下,干预者的教育背景与忠实度或治疗结果无关;但是,没有学士学位的干预者在某些量表上表现出更高的依从性(更高的积极性、更高的安全基础、更高的平静匹配),而且与这些干预者进行的治疗与产妇敏感性的更高增加有关。无论干预者的教育水平如何,将注意力重新引向积极方面和平静地匹配参与者的语气与较高的产妇反思功能相关,而较高的安全基础得分与较高的亲密度相关。研究结果对父母预防计划的培训和实施具有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Predicting fidelity and treatment outcomes in savoring interventions among mothers of young children

Predicting fidelity and treatment outcomes in savoring interventions among mothers of young children

Savoring impacts parents’ emotions and parent–child relationship quality. Using data from a randomized controlled trial (N = 164 mothers of 18–27-month-olds, 37 interveners) conducted with a community sample in the United States, this study examined predictors of fidelity and treatment outcomes across two savoring preventative interventions (relational savoring and personal savoring). Treatment outcome indicators were selected from a battery administered immediately post-intervention (maternal closeness to child) and at a 3-month follow-up (maternal sensitivity, reflective functioning). We examined whether intervener education level (bachelor's degree/no bachelor's degree) predicted fidelity (Research Question 1), whether intervener education level predicted treatment outcomes (Research Question 2), and whether fidelity predicted treatment outcomes (Research Question 3). In many cases, intervener education background was not related to fidelity or treatment outcome; however, interveners without bachelor's degrees showed greater adherence to the protocols on some scales (higher positivity, higher secure base, higher calm matching) and sessions with these interveners were associated with greater increases in maternal sensitivity. Regardless of the intervener education level, redirecting attention to the positive and calmly matching participants’ tone were associated with higher maternal reflective functioning, and higher secure base scores were associated with greater closeness. Findings have implications for the training and implementation of prevention programs for parents.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信