TMS诱导的可塑性改善强迫症 I 的认知控制:随机试验的临床和神经影像学结果

IF 9.6 1区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES
Sophie M D D Fitzsimmons, Tjardo S Postma, A Dilene van Campen, Chris Vriend, Neeltje M Batelaan, Patricia van Oppen, Adriaan W Hoogendoorn, Ysbrand D van der Werf, Odile A van den Heuvel
{"title":"TMS诱导的可塑性改善强迫症 I 的认知控制:随机试验的临床和神经影像学结果","authors":"Sophie M D D Fitzsimmons, Tjardo S Postma, A Dilene van Campen, Chris Vriend, Neeltje M Batelaan, Patricia van Oppen, Adriaan W Hoogendoorn, Ysbrand D van der Werf, Odile A van den Heuvel","doi":"10.1016/j.biopsych.2024.06.029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is an emerging treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). The neurobiological mechanisms of rTMS in OCD have been incompletely characterized. We compared clinical outcomes and changes in task-based brain activation following 3 different rTMS protocols, all combined with exposure and response prevention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this 3-arm proof-of-concept randomized trial, 61 treatment-refractory adult patients with OCD received 16 sessions of rTMS immediately before exposure and response prevention over 8 weeks, with task-based functional magnetic resonance imaging scans and clinical assessments before and after treatment. Patients received high-frequency rTMS to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (n = 19 [13 women/6 men]), high-frequency rTMS to the left pre-supplementary motor area (preSMA) (n = 23 [13 women/10 men]), or control rTMS to the vertex (n = 19 [13 women/6 men]). Changes in task-based functional magnetic resonance imaging activation before/after treatment were compared using both a Bayesian region of interest and a general linear model whole-brain approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean OCD symptom severity decreased significantly in all treatment groups (Δ = -10.836, p < .001, 95% CI -12.504 to -9.168), with no differences between groups. Response rate in the entire sample was 57.4%. The dorsolateral prefrontal cortex rTMS group showed decreased planning-related activation after treatment that was associated with greater symptom improvement. No group-level activation changes were observed for the preSMA and vertex rTMS groups. Participants in the preSMA group with greater symptom improvement showed decreased error-related activation, and symptom improvement in the vertex group was associated with increased inhibition-related activation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>rTMS to preSMA and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex combined with exposure and response prevention led to activation decreases in targeted task networks in individuals showing greater symptom improvement, although we observed no differences in symptom reduction between groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":8918,"journal":{"name":"Biological Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation-Induced Plasticity Improving Cognitive Control in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Part I: Clinical and Neuroimaging Outcomes From a Randomized Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Sophie M D D Fitzsimmons, Tjardo S Postma, A Dilene van Campen, Chris Vriend, Neeltje M Batelaan, Patricia van Oppen, Adriaan W Hoogendoorn, Ysbrand D van der Werf, Odile A van den Heuvel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.biopsych.2024.06.029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is an emerging treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). The neurobiological mechanisms of rTMS in OCD have been incompletely characterized. We compared clinical outcomes and changes in task-based brain activation following 3 different rTMS protocols, all combined with exposure and response prevention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this 3-arm proof-of-concept randomized trial, 61 treatment-refractory adult patients with OCD received 16 sessions of rTMS immediately before exposure and response prevention over 8 weeks, with task-based functional magnetic resonance imaging scans and clinical assessments before and after treatment. Patients received high-frequency rTMS to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (n = 19 [13 women/6 men]), high-frequency rTMS to the left pre-supplementary motor area (preSMA) (n = 23 [13 women/10 men]), or control rTMS to the vertex (n = 19 [13 women/6 men]). Changes in task-based functional magnetic resonance imaging activation before/after treatment were compared using both a Bayesian region of interest and a general linear model whole-brain approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean OCD symptom severity decreased significantly in all treatment groups (Δ = -10.836, p < .001, 95% CI -12.504 to -9.168), with no differences between groups. Response rate in the entire sample was 57.4%. The dorsolateral prefrontal cortex rTMS group showed decreased planning-related activation after treatment that was associated with greater symptom improvement. No group-level activation changes were observed for the preSMA and vertex rTMS groups. Participants in the preSMA group with greater symptom improvement showed decreased error-related activation, and symptom improvement in the vertex group was associated with increased inhibition-related activation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>rTMS to preSMA and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex combined with exposure and response prevention led to activation decreases in targeted task networks in individuals showing greater symptom improvement, although we observed no differences in symptom reduction between groups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8918,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biological Psychiatry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biological Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2024.06.029\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2024.06.029","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)是治疗强迫症(OCD)的一种新兴疗法。经颅磁刺激治疗强迫症的神经生物学机制尚未完全定性。我们比较了三种不同的经颅磁刺激方案(均结合暴露和反应预防(ERP))后的临床疗效和基于任务的脑激活变化:在这项三臂概念验证随机试验中,61 名治疗难治的成年强迫症患者在 8 周内接受了 16 次经颅磁刺激,紧接着又接受了 ERP,并在治疗前后进行了基于任务的功能磁共振成像(tb-fMRI)扫描和临床评估。患者接受的治疗包括:左侧背外侧前额叶皮层(DLPFC)高频经颅磁刺激(n=19(6M/13F));左侧前辅助运动区(preSMA)高频经颅磁刺激(n=23(10M/13F));或顶点对照经颅磁刺激(n=19(6M/13F))。使用贝叶斯兴趣区和一般线性模型全脑方法比较了治疗前和治疗后tb-fMRI激活的变化:结果:在所有治疗组中,强迫症症状的平均严重程度均有显著下降(delta=-10.836,p结论:在所有治疗组中,强迫症症状的平均严重程度均有显著下降:前SMA和DLPFC经颅磁刺激与ERP相结合,导致目标任务网络中的激活减少,从而使患者的症状得到更大改善,尽管我们观察到不同组间在症状减轻方面没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation-Induced Plasticity Improving Cognitive Control in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Part I: Clinical and Neuroimaging Outcomes From a Randomized Trial.

Background: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is an emerging treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). The neurobiological mechanisms of rTMS in OCD have been incompletely characterized. We compared clinical outcomes and changes in task-based brain activation following 3 different rTMS protocols, all combined with exposure and response prevention.

Methods: In this 3-arm proof-of-concept randomized trial, 61 treatment-refractory adult patients with OCD received 16 sessions of rTMS immediately before exposure and response prevention over 8 weeks, with task-based functional magnetic resonance imaging scans and clinical assessments before and after treatment. Patients received high-frequency rTMS to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (n = 19 [13 women/6 men]), high-frequency rTMS to the left pre-supplementary motor area (preSMA) (n = 23 [13 women/10 men]), or control rTMS to the vertex (n = 19 [13 women/6 men]). Changes in task-based functional magnetic resonance imaging activation before/after treatment were compared using both a Bayesian region of interest and a general linear model whole-brain approach.

Results: Mean OCD symptom severity decreased significantly in all treatment groups (Δ = -10.836, p < .001, 95% CI -12.504 to -9.168), with no differences between groups. Response rate in the entire sample was 57.4%. The dorsolateral prefrontal cortex rTMS group showed decreased planning-related activation after treatment that was associated with greater symptom improvement. No group-level activation changes were observed for the preSMA and vertex rTMS groups. Participants in the preSMA group with greater symptom improvement showed decreased error-related activation, and symptom improvement in the vertex group was associated with increased inhibition-related activation.

Conclusions: rTMS to preSMA and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex combined with exposure and response prevention led to activation decreases in targeted task networks in individuals showing greater symptom improvement, although we observed no differences in symptom reduction between groups.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biological Psychiatry
Biological Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
18.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
1398
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Biological Psychiatry is an official journal of the Society of Biological Psychiatry and was established in 1969. It is the first journal in the Biological Psychiatry family, which also includes Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging and Biological Psychiatry: Global Open Science. The Society's main goal is to promote excellence in scientific research and education in the fields related to the nature, causes, mechanisms, and treatments of disorders pertaining to thought, emotion, and behavior. To fulfill this mission, Biological Psychiatry publishes peer-reviewed, rapid-publication articles that present new findings from original basic, translational, and clinical mechanistic research, ultimately advancing our understanding of psychiatric disorders and their treatment. The journal also encourages the submission of reviews and commentaries on current research and topics of interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信