在因特发性视网膜外膜而接受虹膜切除术的患者中使用新型单焦点眼内透镜的临床效果。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Ophthalmologica Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-30 DOI:10.1159/000540362
Tomislav Jukić, Gentian Bajraktari, Nenad Vukojević, Martin Oroz, Andrea Radolović, Krešimir Mandić, Miro Kalauz
{"title":"在因特发性视网膜外膜而接受虹膜切除术的患者中使用新型单焦点眼内透镜的临床效果。","authors":"Tomislav Jukić, Gentian Bajraktari, Nenad Vukojević, Martin Oroz, Andrea Radolović, Krešimir Mandić, Miro Kalauz","doi":"10.1159/000540362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes and quality of life of newly generated monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) in patients diagnosed with idiopathic epiretinal membrane (IEM) following phacovitrectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective study, 42 patients with IEM and cataract underwent pars plana vitrectomy. They were divided into the ICB00 group (21 patients) and the ZCB00 group (21 patients). Data collected before and after the surgery were compared between the two groups, including uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA), vision-related quality of life (VRQOL), intraocular pressure, contrast sensitivity (CS), and central macular thickness (CMT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The preoperative characteristics of the two groups showed no significant differences. However, at the 6-month follow-up after surgery, there were significant improvements in UDVA (p &lt; 0.001), UIVA (p &lt; 0.001), VRQOL (p &lt; 0.001), CS (p &lt; 0.001), and CMT (p &lt; 0.001) compared to baseline. Notably, the Eyhance ICB00 group showed a significantly higher UCIVA value at 6 months post-surgery when compared to the Tecnis ZCB00 group (p = 0.001), while other parameters did not show significant differences between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Eyhance IOL significantly improved both intermediate and distance visual acuity, with no notable difference in quality of life or CS compared to the Tecnis ZCB00 IOL after IEM removal. It appears to be a favorable choice for combined cataract and vitreoretinal surgery, offering enhanced vision for daily tasks and a promising alternative to traditional monofocal IOLs.</p>","PeriodicalId":19595,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Outcomes of a New Monofocal Intraocular Lens in Patients Undergoing Phacovitrectomy for Idiopathic Epiretinal Membrane.\",\"authors\":\"Tomislav Jukić, Gentian Bajraktari, Nenad Vukojević, Martin Oroz, Andrea Radolović, Krešimir Mandić, Miro Kalauz\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000540362\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes and quality of life of newly generated monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) in patients diagnosed with idiopathic epiretinal membrane (IEM) following phacovitrectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective study, 42 patients with IEM and cataract underwent pars plana vitrectomy. They were divided into the ICB00 group (21 patients) and the ZCB00 group (21 patients). Data collected before and after the surgery were compared between the two groups, including uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA), vision-related quality of life (VRQOL), intraocular pressure, contrast sensitivity (CS), and central macular thickness (CMT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The preoperative characteristics of the two groups showed no significant differences. However, at the 6-month follow-up after surgery, there were significant improvements in UDVA (p &lt; 0.001), UIVA (p &lt; 0.001), VRQOL (p &lt; 0.001), CS (p &lt; 0.001), and CMT (p &lt; 0.001) compared to baseline. Notably, the Eyhance ICB00 group showed a significantly higher UCIVA value at 6 months post-surgery when compared to the Tecnis ZCB00 group (p = 0.001), while other parameters did not show significant differences between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Eyhance IOL significantly improved both intermediate and distance visual acuity, with no notable difference in quality of life or CS compared to the Tecnis ZCB00 IOL after IEM removal. It appears to be a favorable choice for combined cataract and vitreoretinal surgery, offering enhanced vision for daily tasks and a promising alternative to traditional monofocal IOLs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19595,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ophthalmologica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ophthalmologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000540362\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000540362","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:本研究的目的是评估特发性视网膜外膜(IEM)患者在接受虹膜玻璃体切除术后新生成的单焦点眼内人工晶体(IOL)的临床疗效和生活质量:在这项前瞻性研究中,42 名特发性视网膜外膜(IEM)和白内障患者接受了玻璃体旁切除术(PPV)。他们被分为 ICB00 组(21 名患者)和 ZCB00 组(21 名患者)。对两组患者手术前后收集的数据进行比较,包括未矫正远视力(UDVA)、未矫正中视力(UIVA)、视觉相关生活质量(VRQOL)、眼压(IOP)、对比敏感度(CS)和黄斑中心厚度(CMT):结果:两组患者的术前特征无明显差异。然而,在术后 6 个月的随访中,UDVA(p < 0.001)、UIVA(p < 0.001)、VRQOL(p < 0.001)、CS(p < 0.001)和 CMT(p < 0.001)与基线相比均有显著改善。值得注意的是,与 Tecnis ZCB00 组相比,Eyhance ICB00 组在术后 6 个月的 UCIVA 值明显更高(p=0.001),而其他参数在各组之间没有明显差异:结论:Eyhance人工晶体与Tecnis ZCB00人工晶体相比,在摘除IEM后,Eyhance人工晶体明显改善了中距离和远距离视力,在生活质量和对比敏感度方面没有明显差异。它似乎是白内障和玻璃体视网膜联合手术的有利选择,可提高日常工作的视力,是传统单焦点人工晶体的理想替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical Outcomes of a New Monofocal Intraocular Lens in Patients Undergoing Phacovitrectomy for Idiopathic Epiretinal Membrane.

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes and quality of life of newly generated monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) in patients diagnosed with idiopathic epiretinal membrane (IEM) following phacovitrectomy.

Methods: In this prospective study, 42 patients with IEM and cataract underwent pars plana vitrectomy. They were divided into the ICB00 group (21 patients) and the ZCB00 group (21 patients). Data collected before and after the surgery were compared between the two groups, including uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA), vision-related quality of life (VRQOL), intraocular pressure, contrast sensitivity (CS), and central macular thickness (CMT).

Results: The preoperative characteristics of the two groups showed no significant differences. However, at the 6-month follow-up after surgery, there were significant improvements in UDVA (p < 0.001), UIVA (p < 0.001), VRQOL (p < 0.001), CS (p < 0.001), and CMT (p < 0.001) compared to baseline. Notably, the Eyhance ICB00 group showed a significantly higher UCIVA value at 6 months post-surgery when compared to the Tecnis ZCB00 group (p = 0.001), while other parameters did not show significant differences between the groups.

Conclusion: The Eyhance IOL significantly improved both intermediate and distance visual acuity, with no notable difference in quality of life or CS compared to the Tecnis ZCB00 IOL after IEM removal. It appears to be a favorable choice for combined cataract and vitreoretinal surgery, offering enhanced vision for daily tasks and a promising alternative to traditional monofocal IOLs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ophthalmologica
Ophthalmologica 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
39
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Published since 1899, ''Ophthalmologica'' has become a frequently cited guide to international work in clinical and experimental ophthalmology. It contains a selection of patient-oriented contributions covering the etiology of eye diseases, diagnostic techniques, and advances in medical and surgical treatment. Straightforward, factual reporting provides both interesting and useful reading. In addition to original papers, ''Ophthalmologica'' features regularly timely reviews in an effort to keep the reader well informed and updated. The large international circulation of this journal reflects its importance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信