Annelies Noorlander, Leonie Lautz, Wendy Jansen Holleboom, Patrick P.J. Mulder, Geert Stoopen, Ans Punt
{"title":"欧洲食物安全局关于使用 NAMs 探索精油作为饲料添加剂的物种间代谢差异的项目","authors":"Annelies Noorlander, Leonie Lautz, Wendy Jansen Holleboom, Patrick P.J. Mulder, Geert Stoopen, Ans Punt","doi":"10.2903/sp.efsa.2024.EN-8820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Botanical preparations, such as essential oils are increasingly used as feed additives to improve the feed quality and animal health while reducing antibiotic use. Regarding safe usage of these preparations for both humans and relevant animal species (e.g., food-producing animals and pets), the toxicity of their constituents requires to be characterised. Particularly, <i>p</i>-allylalkoxybenzene derivatives, that are present in certain botanical preparations, are known to be both genotoxic and carcinogenic and raise health concerns. However, little is known about species differences in sensitivity to the biological effects of these compounds, nor on the transfer from feed to food. Moreover, toxicokinetic properties and resulting toxicity of these compounds can be influenced by other substances present in the botanical preparations. Narrowing this knowledge gap, a NAM-based approach was carried out for five representative <i>p</i>-allylalkoxybenzenes: elemicin, estragole, methyleugenol, myristicin and safrole for six model species: cat, chicken, cow, human, pig and rat. The aim was to generate <i>in vitro</i> kinetic data from liver S9 incubations to explore potential species differences in bioactivation of <i>p</i>-allylalkoxybenzenes combined with PBK modelling. The influence of terpenoids on the <i>p</i>-allylalkoxybenzene-bioactivation was investigated in parallel. <i>In vitro</i> bioactivation was observed in all species for phase I and phase II metabolism at the species and compound-specific level. The presence of terpenoids revealed to be of minor influence on the <i>p</i>-allylalkoxybenzene-bioactivation. The PBK model simulations for two <i>p</i>-allylalkoxybenzenes revealed that all species have a relatively higher formation of the 1’-sulfooxy metabolite compared to that in rats (differences exceed the default uncertainty factor of 4). PBK model simulations of excretion/deposition of the <i>p</i>-allylalkoxybenzenes and their related 1’-hydroxy metabolite indicated limited transfer into milk, eggs and edible tissues. This case study demonstrates the applicability of NAMs to identify species differences in the metabolism of natural compounds from botanical preparations in support of risk assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":100395,"journal":{"name":"EFSA Supporting Publications","volume":"21 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.2903/sp.efsa.2024.EN-8820","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EFSA Project on the use of NAMs to explore interspecies metabolic differences on essential oils as feed additives\",\"authors\":\"Annelies Noorlander, Leonie Lautz, Wendy Jansen Holleboom, Patrick P.J. Mulder, Geert Stoopen, Ans Punt\",\"doi\":\"10.2903/sp.efsa.2024.EN-8820\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Botanical preparations, such as essential oils are increasingly used as feed additives to improve the feed quality and animal health while reducing antibiotic use. Regarding safe usage of these preparations for both humans and relevant animal species (e.g., food-producing animals and pets), the toxicity of their constituents requires to be characterised. Particularly, <i>p</i>-allylalkoxybenzene derivatives, that are present in certain botanical preparations, are known to be both genotoxic and carcinogenic and raise health concerns. However, little is known about species differences in sensitivity to the biological effects of these compounds, nor on the transfer from feed to food. Moreover, toxicokinetic properties and resulting toxicity of these compounds can be influenced by other substances present in the botanical preparations. Narrowing this knowledge gap, a NAM-based approach was carried out for five representative <i>p</i>-allylalkoxybenzenes: elemicin, estragole, methyleugenol, myristicin and safrole for six model species: cat, chicken, cow, human, pig and rat. The aim was to generate <i>in vitro</i> kinetic data from liver S9 incubations to explore potential species differences in bioactivation of <i>p</i>-allylalkoxybenzenes combined with PBK modelling. The influence of terpenoids on the <i>p</i>-allylalkoxybenzene-bioactivation was investigated in parallel. <i>In vitro</i> bioactivation was observed in all species for phase I and phase II metabolism at the species and compound-specific level. The presence of terpenoids revealed to be of minor influence on the <i>p</i>-allylalkoxybenzene-bioactivation. The PBK model simulations for two <i>p</i>-allylalkoxybenzenes revealed that all species have a relatively higher formation of the 1’-sulfooxy metabolite compared to that in rats (differences exceed the default uncertainty factor of 4). PBK model simulations of excretion/deposition of the <i>p</i>-allylalkoxybenzenes and their related 1’-hydroxy metabolite indicated limited transfer into milk, eggs and edible tissues. This case study demonstrates the applicability of NAMs to identify species differences in the metabolism of natural compounds from botanical preparations in support of risk assessment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100395,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EFSA Supporting Publications\",\"volume\":\"21 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.2903/sp.efsa.2024.EN-8820\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EFSA Supporting Publications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/sp.efsa.2024.EN-8820\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EFSA Supporting Publications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/sp.efsa.2024.EN-8820","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要 植物制剂(如精油)越来越多地被用作饲料添加剂,以改善饲料质量和动物健康,同时减少抗生素的使用。关于这些制剂对人类和相关动物物种(如食用动物和宠物)的安全使用问题,需要对其成分的毒性进行鉴定。特别是某些植物制剂中含有的对烯丙基烷氧基苯衍生物,已知具有基因毒性和致癌性,会引发健康问题。然而,人们对物种对这些化合物生物效应的敏感性差异以及从饲料到食物的转移知之甚少。此外,这些化合物的毒物动力学特性和由此产生的毒性可能会受到植物制剂中其他物质的影响。为了缩小这一知识差距,我们针对猫、鸡、牛、人、猪和大鼠这六种模式物种,对五种具有代表性的对烯丙基烷氧基苯:榄香素、雌烯醇、甲基丁香酚、肉豆蔻素和黄樟素进行了基于 NAM 的研究。目的是通过肝脏 S9 培养产生体外动力学数据,结合 PBK 模型探索对烯丙基烷氧基苯生物活化的潜在物种差异。同时还研究了萜类化合物对对烯丙基烷氧基苯生物活化的影响。在所有物种的体外生物活化实验中,都观察到了在物种和化合物特异性水平上的 I 期和 II 期代谢。萜类化合物的存在对对烯丙基烷氧基苯的生物活化影响较小。对两种对烯丙基烷氧基苯的 PBK 模型模拟显示,与大鼠相比,所有物种形成的 1'-sulfooxy 代谢物都相对较多(差异超过默认的不确定系数 4)。对烯丙基烷氧基苯及其相关 1'- 羟基代谢物的排泄/沉积的 PBK 模型模拟表明,转移到牛奶、鸡蛋和可食用组织中的程度有限。本案例研究表明,NAMs 可用于确定植物制剂中天然化合物代谢的物种差异,以支持风险评估。
EFSA Project on the use of NAMs to explore interspecies metabolic differences on essential oils as feed additives
Botanical preparations, such as essential oils are increasingly used as feed additives to improve the feed quality and animal health while reducing antibiotic use. Regarding safe usage of these preparations for both humans and relevant animal species (e.g., food-producing animals and pets), the toxicity of their constituents requires to be characterised. Particularly, p-allylalkoxybenzene derivatives, that are present in certain botanical preparations, are known to be both genotoxic and carcinogenic and raise health concerns. However, little is known about species differences in sensitivity to the biological effects of these compounds, nor on the transfer from feed to food. Moreover, toxicokinetic properties and resulting toxicity of these compounds can be influenced by other substances present in the botanical preparations. Narrowing this knowledge gap, a NAM-based approach was carried out for five representative p-allylalkoxybenzenes: elemicin, estragole, methyleugenol, myristicin and safrole for six model species: cat, chicken, cow, human, pig and rat. The aim was to generate in vitro kinetic data from liver S9 incubations to explore potential species differences in bioactivation of p-allylalkoxybenzenes combined with PBK modelling. The influence of terpenoids on the p-allylalkoxybenzene-bioactivation was investigated in parallel. In vitro bioactivation was observed in all species for phase I and phase II metabolism at the species and compound-specific level. The presence of terpenoids revealed to be of minor influence on the p-allylalkoxybenzene-bioactivation. The PBK model simulations for two p-allylalkoxybenzenes revealed that all species have a relatively higher formation of the 1’-sulfooxy metabolite compared to that in rats (differences exceed the default uncertainty factor of 4). PBK model simulations of excretion/deposition of the p-allylalkoxybenzenes and their related 1’-hydroxy metabolite indicated limited transfer into milk, eggs and edible tissues. This case study demonstrates the applicability of NAMs to identify species differences in the metabolism of natural compounds from botanical preparations in support of risk assessment.