Dana Rose Garfin, Nickolas M Jones, E Alison Holman, Roxane Cohen Silver
{"title":"在集体压力下寻找益处:COVID-19 时代美国代表性纵向样本健康行为研究。","authors":"Dana Rose Garfin, Nickolas M Jones, E Alison Holman, Roxane Cohen Silver","doi":"10.1037/hea0001394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Cognitive strategies like finding benefits during adversity may facilitate coping during collective stressors (like COVID-19) by reducing distress or motivating health protective behaviors.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We explored relationships between benefit finding, collective- and individual-level adversity exposure, psychological distress, and health protective behaviors using longitudinal data collected during the COVID-19 era from a representative, probability-based sample of U.S. residents: Wave 1 (<i>N</i> = 6,514, March 18, 2020-April 18, 2020, 58.5% completion rate); Wave 2 (<i>N</i> = 5,661, September 26, 2020-October 16, 2020, 87.1% completion rate); Wave 3 (<i>N</i> = 4,881, November 8, 2021-November 24, 2021, 75.3% completion rate); and Wave 4 (<i>N</i> = 4,859, May 19, 2022-June 16, 2022, 75.1% completion rate).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Benefit finding was common; k-means clustering (an exploratory, data-driven approach) yielded five trajectories: always high (15.85%), always low (18.52%), always middle (28.47%), increasing (17.79%), and decreasing (19.37%). Benefit-finding trajectories were generally not strong correlates of psychological distress and functional impairment over time. Rather, benefit finding robustly correlated with health protective behaviors relevant to COVID-19 and the seasonal flu. In covariate-adjusted models, benefit finding positively correlated with more social distancing (β = .24, <i>p</i> < .001) and mask wearing (β = .18, <i>p</i> < .001) at Wave 2 and greater COVID-19 (odds ratio, <i>OR</i> = 1.23, <i>p</i> = .001) and flu (<i>OR</i> = 1.29, <i>p</i> < .001) vaccination at Wave 3.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although benefit finding was not generally associated with lower psychological distress during a collective stressor, it correlated with engagement in stressor-related health protective behaviors. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Finding benefits during collective stress: A study of health behaviors in a longitudinal representative U.S. sample during the COVID-19 era.\",\"authors\":\"Dana Rose Garfin, Nickolas M Jones, E Alison Holman, Roxane Cohen Silver\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/hea0001394\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Cognitive strategies like finding benefits during adversity may facilitate coping during collective stressors (like COVID-19) by reducing distress or motivating health protective behaviors.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We explored relationships between benefit finding, collective- and individual-level adversity exposure, psychological distress, and health protective behaviors using longitudinal data collected during the COVID-19 era from a representative, probability-based sample of U.S. residents: Wave 1 (<i>N</i> = 6,514, March 18, 2020-April 18, 2020, 58.5% completion rate); Wave 2 (<i>N</i> = 5,661, September 26, 2020-October 16, 2020, 87.1% completion rate); Wave 3 (<i>N</i> = 4,881, November 8, 2021-November 24, 2021, 75.3% completion rate); and Wave 4 (<i>N</i> = 4,859, May 19, 2022-June 16, 2022, 75.1% completion rate).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Benefit finding was common; k-means clustering (an exploratory, data-driven approach) yielded five trajectories: always high (15.85%), always low (18.52%), always middle (28.47%), increasing (17.79%), and decreasing (19.37%). Benefit-finding trajectories were generally not strong correlates of psychological distress and functional impairment over time. Rather, benefit finding robustly correlated with health protective behaviors relevant to COVID-19 and the seasonal flu. In covariate-adjusted models, benefit finding positively correlated with more social distancing (β = .24, <i>p</i> < .001) and mask wearing (β = .18, <i>p</i> < .001) at Wave 2 and greater COVID-19 (odds ratio, <i>OR</i> = 1.23, <i>p</i> = .001) and flu (<i>OR</i> = 1.29, <i>p</i> < .001) vaccination at Wave 3.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although benefit finding was not generally associated with lower psychological distress during a collective stressor, it correlated with engagement in stressor-related health protective behaviors. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0001394\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0001394","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
Finding benefits during collective stress: A study of health behaviors in a longitudinal representative U.S. sample during the COVID-19 era.
Objective: Cognitive strategies like finding benefits during adversity may facilitate coping during collective stressors (like COVID-19) by reducing distress or motivating health protective behaviors.
Method: We explored relationships between benefit finding, collective- and individual-level adversity exposure, psychological distress, and health protective behaviors using longitudinal data collected during the COVID-19 era from a representative, probability-based sample of U.S. residents: Wave 1 (N = 6,514, March 18, 2020-April 18, 2020, 58.5% completion rate); Wave 2 (N = 5,661, September 26, 2020-October 16, 2020, 87.1% completion rate); Wave 3 (N = 4,881, November 8, 2021-November 24, 2021, 75.3% completion rate); and Wave 4 (N = 4,859, May 19, 2022-June 16, 2022, 75.1% completion rate).
Results: Benefit finding was common; k-means clustering (an exploratory, data-driven approach) yielded five trajectories: always high (15.85%), always low (18.52%), always middle (28.47%), increasing (17.79%), and decreasing (19.37%). Benefit-finding trajectories were generally not strong correlates of psychological distress and functional impairment over time. Rather, benefit finding robustly correlated with health protective behaviors relevant to COVID-19 and the seasonal flu. In covariate-adjusted models, benefit finding positively correlated with more social distancing (β = .24, p < .001) and mask wearing (β = .18, p < .001) at Wave 2 and greater COVID-19 (odds ratio, OR = 1.23, p = .001) and flu (OR = 1.29, p < .001) vaccination at Wave 3.
Conclusions: Although benefit finding was not generally associated with lower psychological distress during a collective stressor, it correlated with engagement in stressor-related health protective behaviors. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).