成人重症患者拔管失败的独立风险因素:沙特阿拉伯的一项前瞻性观察研究。

IF 1.3 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Aqeel Hamad Al-Ali, Khalid Abdullah Alraeyes, Princess Rhea Julkarnain, Arul Prasath Lakshmanan, Alzahra Alobaid, Ahmed Yahya Aljoni, Nada Hadi Saleem, Mohammed Ali Al Odat, Waleed Tharwat Aletreby
{"title":"成人重症患者拔管失败的独立风险因素:沙特阿拉伯的一项前瞻性观察研究。","authors":"Aqeel Hamad Al-Ali, Khalid Abdullah Alraeyes, Princess Rhea Julkarnain, Arul Prasath Lakshmanan, Alzahra Alobaid, Ahmed Yahya Aljoni, Nada Hadi Saleem, Mohammed Ali Al Odat, Waleed Tharwat Aletreby","doi":"10.4103/sjmms.sjmms_19_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mechanical ventilation provides essential support for critically ill patients in several diagnoses; however, extubation failure can affect patient outcomes. From Saudi Arabia, no study has assessed the factors associated with extubation failure in adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective observational study was conducted in the intensive care unit of a tertiary care hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Adult patients who had been mechanically ventilated via the endotracheal tube for a minimum of 24 hours and then extubated according to the weaning protocol were included. Failed extubation was defined as reintubation within 48 hours of extubation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 505 patients were included, of which 72 patients had failed extubation (14.3%, 95% CI: 11.4%-17.7%). Compared with the failed extubation group, the successfully extubated group had significantly shorter duration of mechanical ventilation (mean difference: -2.6 days, 95% CI: -4.3 to -1; <i>P</i> = 0.001), a slower respiratory rate at the time of extubation (mean difference: -2.3 breath/min, 95% CI: -3.8 to -1; <i>P</i> = 0.0005), higher pH (mean difference: 0.02, 95% CI: 0.001-0.04; <i>P</i> = 0.03), and more patients with strong cough (percent difference: 17.7%, 95% CI: 4.8%-30.5%; <i>P</i> = 0.02). Independent risk factors of failed extubation were age (aOR = 1.02; 95% CI: 1.002-1.03; <i>P</i> = 0.03), respiratory rate (aOR = 1.06, 95% CI: 1.01-1.1; <i>P</i> = 0.008), duration of mechanical ventilation (aOR = 1.08, 95% CI: 1.03 - 1.1; <i>P</i> < 0.001), and pH (aOR = 0.02, 95% CI: 0.0006-0.5; <i>P</i> = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Older age, longer duration of mechanical ventilation, faster respiratory rate, and lower pH were found to be independent risk factors that significantly increased the odds of extubation failure among adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":21442,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Journal of Medicine & Medical Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11268545/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Independent Risk Factors of Failed Extubation among Adult Critically Ill Patients: A Prospective Observational Study from Saudi Arabia.\",\"authors\":\"Aqeel Hamad Al-Ali, Khalid Abdullah Alraeyes, Princess Rhea Julkarnain, Arul Prasath Lakshmanan, Alzahra Alobaid, Ahmed Yahya Aljoni, Nada Hadi Saleem, Mohammed Ali Al Odat, Waleed Tharwat Aletreby\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/sjmms.sjmms_19_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mechanical ventilation provides essential support for critically ill patients in several diagnoses; however, extubation failure can affect patient outcomes. From Saudi Arabia, no study has assessed the factors associated with extubation failure in adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective observational study was conducted in the intensive care unit of a tertiary care hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Adult patients who had been mechanically ventilated via the endotracheal tube for a minimum of 24 hours and then extubated according to the weaning protocol were included. Failed extubation was defined as reintubation within 48 hours of extubation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 505 patients were included, of which 72 patients had failed extubation (14.3%, 95% CI: 11.4%-17.7%). Compared with the failed extubation group, the successfully extubated group had significantly shorter duration of mechanical ventilation (mean difference: -2.6 days, 95% CI: -4.3 to -1; <i>P</i> = 0.001), a slower respiratory rate at the time of extubation (mean difference: -2.3 breath/min, 95% CI: -3.8 to -1; <i>P</i> = 0.0005), higher pH (mean difference: 0.02, 95% CI: 0.001-0.04; <i>P</i> = 0.03), and more patients with strong cough (percent difference: 17.7%, 95% CI: 4.8%-30.5%; <i>P</i> = 0.02). Independent risk factors of failed extubation were age (aOR = 1.02; 95% CI: 1.002-1.03; <i>P</i> = 0.03), respiratory rate (aOR = 1.06, 95% CI: 1.01-1.1; <i>P</i> = 0.008), duration of mechanical ventilation (aOR = 1.08, 95% CI: 1.03 - 1.1; <i>P</i> < 0.001), and pH (aOR = 0.02, 95% CI: 0.0006-0.5; <i>P</i> = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Older age, longer duration of mechanical ventilation, faster respiratory rate, and lower pH were found to be independent risk factors that significantly increased the odds of extubation failure among adults.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21442,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Saudi Journal of Medicine & Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11268545/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Saudi Journal of Medicine & Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/sjmms.sjmms_19_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Journal of Medicine & Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/sjmms.sjmms_19_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:机械通气为多种诊断的重症患者提供了必要的支持;然而,拔管失败会影响患者的预后。在沙特阿拉伯,还没有研究对成人拔管失败的相关因素进行评估:这项前瞻性观察研究在沙特阿拉伯利雅得一家三级医院的重症监护室进行。研究对象包括通过气管插管进行机械通气至少 24 小时,然后根据断气方案拔管的成人患者。拔管失败的定义是在拔管后 48 小时内再次插管:结果:共纳入 505 例患者,其中 72 例患者拔管失败(14.3%,95% CI:11.4%-17.7%)。与拔管失败组相比,成功拔管组的机械通气时间明显更短(平均差异:-2.6 天,95% CI:-4.3 至-1;P = 0.001),拔管时呼吸频率更慢(平均差异:-2.3次/分,95% CI:-3.8至-1;P = 0.0005),pH值较高(平均差异:0.02,95% CI:0.001至0.04;P = 0.03),强咳嗽患者较多(百分比差异:17.7%,95% CI:4.8%至30.5%;P = 0.02)。拔管失败的独立风险因素包括年龄(aOR = 1.02;95% CI:1.002-1.03;P = 0.03)、呼吸频率(aOR = 1.06;95% CI:1.01-1.1;P = 0.008)、机械通气持续时间(aOR = 1.08;95% CI:1.03-1.1;P <0.001)和 pH 值(aOR = 0.02;95% CI:0.0006-0.5;P = 0.02):结论:年龄较大、机械通气持续时间较长、呼吸频率较快和 pH 值较低是显著增加成人拔管失败几率的独立风险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Independent Risk Factors of Failed Extubation among Adult Critically Ill Patients: A Prospective Observational Study from Saudi Arabia.

Background: Mechanical ventilation provides essential support for critically ill patients in several diagnoses; however, extubation failure can affect patient outcomes. From Saudi Arabia, no study has assessed the factors associated with extubation failure in adults.

Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted in the intensive care unit of a tertiary care hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Adult patients who had been mechanically ventilated via the endotracheal tube for a minimum of 24 hours and then extubated according to the weaning protocol were included. Failed extubation was defined as reintubation within 48 hours of extubation.

Results: A total of 505 patients were included, of which 72 patients had failed extubation (14.3%, 95% CI: 11.4%-17.7%). Compared with the failed extubation group, the successfully extubated group had significantly shorter duration of mechanical ventilation (mean difference: -2.6 days, 95% CI: -4.3 to -1; P = 0.001), a slower respiratory rate at the time of extubation (mean difference: -2.3 breath/min, 95% CI: -3.8 to -1; P = 0.0005), higher pH (mean difference: 0.02, 95% CI: 0.001-0.04; P = 0.03), and more patients with strong cough (percent difference: 17.7%, 95% CI: 4.8%-30.5%; P = 0.02). Independent risk factors of failed extubation were age (aOR = 1.02; 95% CI: 1.002-1.03; P = 0.03), respiratory rate (aOR = 1.06, 95% CI: 1.01-1.1; P = 0.008), duration of mechanical ventilation (aOR = 1.08, 95% CI: 1.03 - 1.1; P < 0.001), and pH (aOR = 0.02, 95% CI: 0.0006-0.5; P = 0.02).

Conclusion: Older age, longer duration of mechanical ventilation, faster respiratory rate, and lower pH were found to be independent risk factors that significantly increased the odds of extubation failure among adults.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Saudi Journal of Medicine & Medical Sciences
Saudi Journal of Medicine & Medical Sciences MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Saudi Journal of Medicine & Medical Sciences (SJMMS) is the official scientific journal of Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University. It is an international peer-reviewed, general medical journal. The scope of the Journal is to publish research that will be of interest to health specialties both in academic and clinical practice. The Journal aims at disseminating high-powered research results with the objective of turning research into knowledge. It seeks to promote scholarly publishing in medicine and medical sciences. The Journal is published in print and online. The target readers of the Journal include all medical and health professionals in the health cluster such as in medicine, dentistry, nursing, applied medical sciences, clinical pharmacology, public health, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信