{"title":"有轨电车对邻近街道车辆与车辆(以及车辆与行人)碰撞率的短期和中期影响","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.cstp.2024.101262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Introducing new public transit systems impacts the surrounding built environment, and changes in the built environment can affect travel behavior. Prior research has yet to thoroughly conduct a comprehensive exploration of the influence of new investments in public modes of transit, particularly streetcars, on motor vehicle crashes occurring on adjoining streets, considering other related factors. In particular, the difference between short-term and mid-term impacts of streetcars considering initial break-in periods has yet to be thoroughly conducted. This study focuses on the short-term and mid-term effects of the streetcar on total, injury, and pedestrian-involved vehicle crash rates on the adjacent street, considering traffic volume, traffic speeds, and traffic conflicts (transit ridership, pedestrian volume, and traffic policy).</p></div><div><h3>Data & Method</h3><p>This paper used the Utah Department of Transportation’s (UDOT) crash count, annual average daily traffic (AADT), iPeMS data, Utah Transit Authority’s (UTA) ridership, manually calculated pedestrian volume from Google Street View, and conducted interviews with UDOT’s experts. In the method, we used three quasi-experimental research designs: (1) before-after without a control group, (2) interrupted time series, and (3) before-after with a control group. In addition, to identify the cause of this impact, we examined multiple dimensions, including traffic volume, traffic speeds, transit ridership, pedestrian volume, and adjustments in traffic policy changes.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>As a result, the establishment of the S-Line streetcar eventually led to a significant decrease in total (short: 11 %, mid: −15 %), injury (short: −9%, mid: −41 %), and pedestrian-involved (short: −25 %, mid: −43 %) crash rates on the adjacent street, especially after the streetcar was fully established (3 years after). In particular, injury and pedestrian-involved crash rates decreased significantly. Also, we found that increased drivers’ awareness and vitality of the street due to the increased transit ridership (short: 43 %, mid: 50 %), increased pedestrian volume (short: 35 %, mid: 75 %), and improvement of traffic signal on the adjacent street can be the main causes<em>.</em></p></div><div><h3>Practical Applications</h3><p>The outcomes of this study are considered to help establish short-term and mid-term traffic policies that consider public transit improvements such as streetcars.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46989,"journal":{"name":"Case Studies on Transport Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Short and mid-term effect of the streetcar on vehicle-vehicle (and vehicle-pedestrian) crash rate on the adjacent street\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cstp.2024.101262\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Introducing new public transit systems impacts the surrounding built environment, and changes in the built environment can affect travel behavior. Prior research has yet to thoroughly conduct a comprehensive exploration of the influence of new investments in public modes of transit, particularly streetcars, on motor vehicle crashes occurring on adjoining streets, considering other related factors. In particular, the difference between short-term and mid-term impacts of streetcars considering initial break-in periods has yet to be thoroughly conducted. This study focuses on the short-term and mid-term effects of the streetcar on total, injury, and pedestrian-involved vehicle crash rates on the adjacent street, considering traffic volume, traffic speeds, and traffic conflicts (transit ridership, pedestrian volume, and traffic policy).</p></div><div><h3>Data & Method</h3><p>This paper used the Utah Department of Transportation’s (UDOT) crash count, annual average daily traffic (AADT), iPeMS data, Utah Transit Authority’s (UTA) ridership, manually calculated pedestrian volume from Google Street View, and conducted interviews with UDOT’s experts. In the method, we used three quasi-experimental research designs: (1) before-after without a control group, (2) interrupted time series, and (3) before-after with a control group. In addition, to identify the cause of this impact, we examined multiple dimensions, including traffic volume, traffic speeds, transit ridership, pedestrian volume, and adjustments in traffic policy changes.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>As a result, the establishment of the S-Line streetcar eventually led to a significant decrease in total (short: 11 %, mid: −15 %), injury (short: −9%, mid: −41 %), and pedestrian-involved (short: −25 %, mid: −43 %) crash rates on the adjacent street, especially after the streetcar was fully established (3 years after). In particular, injury and pedestrian-involved crash rates decreased significantly. Also, we found that increased drivers’ awareness and vitality of the street due to the increased transit ridership (short: 43 %, mid: 50 %), increased pedestrian volume (short: 35 %, mid: 75 %), and improvement of traffic signal on the adjacent street can be the main causes<em>.</em></p></div><div><h3>Practical Applications</h3><p>The outcomes of this study are considered to help establish short-term and mid-term traffic policies that consider public transit improvements such as streetcars.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Case Studies on Transport Policy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Case Studies on Transport Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213624X24001172\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case Studies on Transport Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213624X24001172","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Short and mid-term effect of the streetcar on vehicle-vehicle (and vehicle-pedestrian) crash rate on the adjacent street
Introduction
Introducing new public transit systems impacts the surrounding built environment, and changes in the built environment can affect travel behavior. Prior research has yet to thoroughly conduct a comprehensive exploration of the influence of new investments in public modes of transit, particularly streetcars, on motor vehicle crashes occurring on adjoining streets, considering other related factors. In particular, the difference between short-term and mid-term impacts of streetcars considering initial break-in periods has yet to be thoroughly conducted. This study focuses on the short-term and mid-term effects of the streetcar on total, injury, and pedestrian-involved vehicle crash rates on the adjacent street, considering traffic volume, traffic speeds, and traffic conflicts (transit ridership, pedestrian volume, and traffic policy).
Data & Method
This paper used the Utah Department of Transportation’s (UDOT) crash count, annual average daily traffic (AADT), iPeMS data, Utah Transit Authority’s (UTA) ridership, manually calculated pedestrian volume from Google Street View, and conducted interviews with UDOT’s experts. In the method, we used three quasi-experimental research designs: (1) before-after without a control group, (2) interrupted time series, and (3) before-after with a control group. In addition, to identify the cause of this impact, we examined multiple dimensions, including traffic volume, traffic speeds, transit ridership, pedestrian volume, and adjustments in traffic policy changes.
Results
As a result, the establishment of the S-Line streetcar eventually led to a significant decrease in total (short: 11 %, mid: −15 %), injury (short: −9%, mid: −41 %), and pedestrian-involved (short: −25 %, mid: −43 %) crash rates on the adjacent street, especially after the streetcar was fully established (3 years after). In particular, injury and pedestrian-involved crash rates decreased significantly. Also, we found that increased drivers’ awareness and vitality of the street due to the increased transit ridership (short: 43 %, mid: 50 %), increased pedestrian volume (short: 35 %, mid: 75 %), and improvement of traffic signal on the adjacent street can be the main causes.
Practical Applications
The outcomes of this study are considered to help establish short-term and mid-term traffic policies that consider public transit improvements such as streetcars.