葡萄牙 III 期临床试验中知情同意的质量:参与者的观点。

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Acta medica portuguesa Pub Date : 2024-09-02 Epub Date: 2024-07-19 DOI:10.20344/amp.20570
Pedro L Ferreira, Ana Barradas, Inês Ribeiro
{"title":"葡萄牙 III 期临床试验中知情同意的质量:参与者的观点。","authors":"Pedro L Ferreira, Ana Barradas, Inês Ribeiro","doi":"10.20344/amp.20570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Some studies show that participants do not always fully understand the informed consent form (ICF), which is one of the reasons for dropouts. This study aimed to adapt the Quality of Informed Consent (QuIC) questionnaire into a valid instrument to be applied to the Portuguese population and to measure its reliability and validity in the Portuguese population, by applying it to a sample of participants in controlled trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The QuIC questionnaire was developed to assess the quality of informed consent in clinical trials and consists of two parts, addressing both the objective (part A) and the subjective (part B) understanding. After being translated and validated into Portuguese, it was implemented in 100 cardiac participants of phase III clinical trials in a University Hospital Center.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The QuIC-PT questionnaire showed excellent stability over time and good validity. All patients evaluated their participation and their health positively and recognized the main purpose of the clinical trial. Almost all participants understood their role in helping future patients and the purpose of the trial and realized that, by signing the ICF, they were participating in a clinical trial. However, none of them knew that their experimental treatment was not proven to be the best alternative for their condition.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The QuIC-PT questionnaire seems to be a valid and useful instrument to evaluate the participants' understanding of the ICF. In this study, we found that some concepts, like 'study protocol' or 'randomization', were not well understood by participants when signing the ICF, especially by participants with lower education levels. They also believed that the experimental intervention would solve their health condition. Greater awareness about the importance of the informed consent process and ICF is necessary so that participants can fully understand the protocol, especially the risks involved, and their rights as participants.</p>","PeriodicalId":7059,"journal":{"name":"Acta medica portuguesa","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality of Informed Consent in Phase III Clinical Trials in Portugal: The Participants' Perspective.\",\"authors\":\"Pedro L Ferreira, Ana Barradas, Inês Ribeiro\",\"doi\":\"10.20344/amp.20570\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Some studies show that participants do not always fully understand the informed consent form (ICF), which is one of the reasons for dropouts. This study aimed to adapt the Quality of Informed Consent (QuIC) questionnaire into a valid instrument to be applied to the Portuguese population and to measure its reliability and validity in the Portuguese population, by applying it to a sample of participants in controlled trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The QuIC questionnaire was developed to assess the quality of informed consent in clinical trials and consists of two parts, addressing both the objective (part A) and the subjective (part B) understanding. After being translated and validated into Portuguese, it was implemented in 100 cardiac participants of phase III clinical trials in a University Hospital Center.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The QuIC-PT questionnaire showed excellent stability over time and good validity. All patients evaluated their participation and their health positively and recognized the main purpose of the clinical trial. Almost all participants understood their role in helping future patients and the purpose of the trial and realized that, by signing the ICF, they were participating in a clinical trial. However, none of them knew that their experimental treatment was not proven to be the best alternative for their condition.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The QuIC-PT questionnaire seems to be a valid and useful instrument to evaluate the participants' understanding of the ICF. In this study, we found that some concepts, like 'study protocol' or 'randomization', were not well understood by participants when signing the ICF, especially by participants with lower education levels. They also believed that the experimental intervention would solve their health condition. Greater awareness about the importance of the informed consent process and ICF is necessary so that participants can fully understand the protocol, especially the risks involved, and their rights as participants.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7059,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta medica portuguesa\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta medica portuguesa\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20344/amp.20570\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta medica portuguesa","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20344/amp.20570","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:一些研究表明,参与者并不总是完全理解知情同意书(ICF)的内容,这也是导致退出的原因之一:一些研究表明,参与者并不总是完全理解知情同意书(ICF),这也是导致退出的原因之一。本研究旨在将知情同意书质量(QuIC)问卷调整为适用于葡萄牙人口的有效工具,并通过将其应用于对照试验的参与者样本,测量其在葡萄牙人口中的可靠性和有效性:QuIC问卷是为评估临床试验中知情同意的质量而开发的,由两部分组成,分别针对客观(A部分)和主观(B部分)的理解。该问卷被翻译成葡萄牙语并经过验证后,在一所大学医院中心对 100 名参加 III 期临床试验的心脏病患者进行了测试:结果:QuIC-PT 问卷显示出良好的长期稳定性和有效性。所有患者都对自己的参与和健康状况给予了积极评价,并认识到临床试验的主要目的。几乎所有参与者都了解自己在帮助未来患者方面所扮演的角色以及试验的目的,并意识到在 ICF 上签字就是在参与临床试验。但是,他们中没有人知道他们的试验性治疗并没有被证明是治疗他们病情的最佳选择:QuIC-PT问卷似乎是评估参与者对《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》理解程度的有效且有用的工具。在这项研究中,我们发现参与者在签署《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》时,对一些概念,如 "研究方案 "或 "随机化",理解得并不透彻,尤其是教育水平较低的参与者。他们还认为实验干预可以解决他们的健康问题。有必要提高对知情同意程序和 ICF 重要性的认识,以便参与者能够充分理解研究方案,尤其是其中涉及的风险,以及他们作为参与者的权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quality of Informed Consent in Phase III Clinical Trials in Portugal: The Participants' Perspective.

Introduction: Some studies show that participants do not always fully understand the informed consent form (ICF), which is one of the reasons for dropouts. This study aimed to adapt the Quality of Informed Consent (QuIC) questionnaire into a valid instrument to be applied to the Portuguese population and to measure its reliability and validity in the Portuguese population, by applying it to a sample of participants in controlled trials.

Methods: The QuIC questionnaire was developed to assess the quality of informed consent in clinical trials and consists of two parts, addressing both the objective (part A) and the subjective (part B) understanding. After being translated and validated into Portuguese, it was implemented in 100 cardiac participants of phase III clinical trials in a University Hospital Center.

Results: The QuIC-PT questionnaire showed excellent stability over time and good validity. All patients evaluated their participation and their health positively and recognized the main purpose of the clinical trial. Almost all participants understood their role in helping future patients and the purpose of the trial and realized that, by signing the ICF, they were participating in a clinical trial. However, none of them knew that their experimental treatment was not proven to be the best alternative for their condition.

Conclusion: The QuIC-PT questionnaire seems to be a valid and useful instrument to evaluate the participants' understanding of the ICF. In this study, we found that some concepts, like 'study protocol' or 'randomization', were not well understood by participants when signing the ICF, especially by participants with lower education levels. They also believed that the experimental intervention would solve their health condition. Greater awareness about the importance of the informed consent process and ICF is necessary so that participants can fully understand the protocol, especially the risks involved, and their rights as participants.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta medica portuguesa
Acta medica portuguesa MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
256
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of Acta Médica Portuguesa is to publish original research and review articles in biomedical areas of the highest standard, covering several domains of medical knowledge, with the purpose to help doctors improve medical care. In order to accomplish these aims, Acta Médica Portuguesa publishes original articles, review articles, case reports and editorials, among others, with a focus on clinical, scientific, social, political and economic factors affecting health. Acta Médica Portuguesa will be happy to consider manuscripts for publication from authors anywhere in the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信