Lydia Mainey PhD , Sandra Downing MAE , Mary-Clare Balnaves , Joyce Cappiello PhD , Jemma King MPH , Ann Peacock PhD , Lisa Peberdy PhD , Judith Dean PhD
{"title":"澳大利亚护理和助产课程设计的盲点:通过意外怀孕棱镜进行的定性研究","authors":"Lydia Mainey PhD , Sandra Downing MAE , Mary-Clare Balnaves , Joyce Cappiello PhD , Jemma King MPH , Ann Peacock PhD , Lisa Peberdy PhD , Judith Dean PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.teln.2024.05.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>There is rising concern about the work readiness of nursing and midwifery graduates. Using the prism of unplanned pregnancy to understand Australian academics' perspectives of teaching this topic may highlight challenges associated with the current national education accreditation model and contribute to the dearth of international research on nursing and midwifery education accreditation.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>This study aimed to explore Australian academics' perspectives on teaching unplanned pregnancy prevention and care to undergraduate nursing and midwifery students.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A constructivist qualitative study of undergraduate nursing and midwifery academics in Australia.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>We constructed three major themes from the thematic analysis: <em>accreditation barriers and conflicting agendas, important but not important enough</em> and <em>protecting against the \"unmentionable\".</em></p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>These findings highlight participants' misunderstanding of curriculum development and the lack of safeguards to protect against curriculum blind spots allows important healthcare topics to slip through the cracks. The official curriculum appears to be at the discretion of individuals and groups who, rightly or wrongly, have their own opinions of what knowledge and skills are essential. We also found prevailing abortion stigma remains a barrier to education.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46287,"journal":{"name":"Teaching and Learning in Nursing","volume":"19 4","pages":"Pages e654-e660"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1557308724001112/pdfft?md5=7f6dc10ecc30b4c1566c02eba1365219&pid=1-s2.0-S1557308724001112-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Australian nursing and midwifery curriculum design blind spots: a qualitative study through the prism of unplanned pregnancy\",\"authors\":\"Lydia Mainey PhD , Sandra Downing MAE , Mary-Clare Balnaves , Joyce Cappiello PhD , Jemma King MPH , Ann Peacock PhD , Lisa Peberdy PhD , Judith Dean PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.teln.2024.05.014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>There is rising concern about the work readiness of nursing and midwifery graduates. Using the prism of unplanned pregnancy to understand Australian academics' perspectives of teaching this topic may highlight challenges associated with the current national education accreditation model and contribute to the dearth of international research on nursing and midwifery education accreditation.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>This study aimed to explore Australian academics' perspectives on teaching unplanned pregnancy prevention and care to undergraduate nursing and midwifery students.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A constructivist qualitative study of undergraduate nursing and midwifery academics in Australia.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>We constructed three major themes from the thematic analysis: <em>accreditation barriers and conflicting agendas, important but not important enough</em> and <em>protecting against the \\\"unmentionable\\\".</em></p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>These findings highlight participants' misunderstanding of curriculum development and the lack of safeguards to protect against curriculum blind spots allows important healthcare topics to slip through the cracks. The official curriculum appears to be at the discretion of individuals and groups who, rightly or wrongly, have their own opinions of what knowledge and skills are essential. We also found prevailing abortion stigma remains a barrier to education.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46287,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Teaching and Learning in Nursing\",\"volume\":\"19 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages e654-e660\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1557308724001112/pdfft?md5=7f6dc10ecc30b4c1566c02eba1365219&pid=1-s2.0-S1557308724001112-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Teaching and Learning in Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1557308724001112\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching and Learning in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1557308724001112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Australian nursing and midwifery curriculum design blind spots: a qualitative study through the prism of unplanned pregnancy
Background
There is rising concern about the work readiness of nursing and midwifery graduates. Using the prism of unplanned pregnancy to understand Australian academics' perspectives of teaching this topic may highlight challenges associated with the current national education accreditation model and contribute to the dearth of international research on nursing and midwifery education accreditation.
Aim
This study aimed to explore Australian academics' perspectives on teaching unplanned pregnancy prevention and care to undergraduate nursing and midwifery students.
Methods
A constructivist qualitative study of undergraduate nursing and midwifery academics in Australia.
Findings
We constructed three major themes from the thematic analysis: accreditation barriers and conflicting agendas, important but not important enough and protecting against the "unmentionable".
Conclusions
These findings highlight participants' misunderstanding of curriculum development and the lack of safeguards to protect against curriculum blind spots allows important healthcare topics to slip through the cracks. The official curriculum appears to be at the discretion of individuals and groups who, rightly or wrongly, have their own opinions of what knowledge and skills are essential. We also found prevailing abortion stigma remains a barrier to education.
期刊介绍:
Teaching and Learning in Nursing is the Official Journal of the National Organization of Associate Degree Nursing. The journal is dedicated to the advancement of Associate Degree Nursing education and practice, and promotes collaboration in charting the future of health care education and delivery. Topics include: - Managing Different Learning Styles - New Faculty Mentoring - Legal Issues - Research - Legislative Issues - Instructional Design Strategies - Leadership, Management Roles - Unique Funding for Programs and Faculty