护理本科生如何应对临床相关压力:范围综述

IF 1.9 Q2 NURSING
Giuliana Harvey RN, PhD, Catherine Carter-Snell RN, PhD, Mohamed Toufic El Hussein RN, PhD, NP, Katilin Berlinguette
{"title":"护理本科生如何应对临床相关压力:范围综述","authors":"Giuliana Harvey RN, PhD,&nbsp;Catherine Carter-Snell RN, PhD,&nbsp;Mohamed Toufic El Hussein RN, PhD, NP,&nbsp;Katilin Berlinguette","doi":"10.1016/j.teln.2024.06.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Primary Objective</h3><p>To identify the strategies used by undergraduate nursing students to cope with clinical related stress.</p></div><div><h3>Background</h3><p>Learning in the clinical environment may be stressful for nursing students. Effective coping mechanisms are imperative given that stress may compromise students’ well-being, ability to learn, and patient care. A scoping review was conducted using the Joanna Briggs Institute framework.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Primary research sources and dissertations were searched using the CINHAL, PubMed, PsycINFO, Google Scholar, and Thesis Global databases as well as an ancestry approach. Eligibility criteria included primary research on undergraduate nursing students’ coping with clinical related stress in an experiential learning environment.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>From a total of 573 identified articles, 35 met the inclusion criteria. The included studies were primarily conducted using quantitative designs, originated from various countries, and focused on students’ clinical experiences from varying years. The most frequently used coping mechanism was problem-focused approaches. Coping strategies employed by students were often conceptualized as dichotomous, such as effective or in-effective, rather than dependent on contextual circumstances. Coping as a concept was primarily explored using measurement tools that limited understanding the processes students used to engage in problem-solving.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This review highlighted a gap in the trajectory of “how” students cope with stress in clinical practice. Further research is needed to inform the development of personalized tools and skills that can be used by students.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46287,"journal":{"name":"Teaching and Learning in Nursing","volume":"19 4","pages":"Pages 372-384"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1557308724001355/pdfft?md5=9ff18cba7f4d74879b67da146a199c16&pid=1-s2.0-S1557308724001355-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Coping with clinical related stress experienced by undergraduate nursing students: A scoping review\",\"authors\":\"Giuliana Harvey RN, PhD,&nbsp;Catherine Carter-Snell RN, PhD,&nbsp;Mohamed Toufic El Hussein RN, PhD, NP,&nbsp;Katilin Berlinguette\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.teln.2024.06.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Primary Objective</h3><p>To identify the strategies used by undergraduate nursing students to cope with clinical related stress.</p></div><div><h3>Background</h3><p>Learning in the clinical environment may be stressful for nursing students. Effective coping mechanisms are imperative given that stress may compromise students’ well-being, ability to learn, and patient care. A scoping review was conducted using the Joanna Briggs Institute framework.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Primary research sources and dissertations were searched using the CINHAL, PubMed, PsycINFO, Google Scholar, and Thesis Global databases as well as an ancestry approach. Eligibility criteria included primary research on undergraduate nursing students’ coping with clinical related stress in an experiential learning environment.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>From a total of 573 identified articles, 35 met the inclusion criteria. The included studies were primarily conducted using quantitative designs, originated from various countries, and focused on students’ clinical experiences from varying years. The most frequently used coping mechanism was problem-focused approaches. Coping strategies employed by students were often conceptualized as dichotomous, such as effective or in-effective, rather than dependent on contextual circumstances. Coping as a concept was primarily explored using measurement tools that limited understanding the processes students used to engage in problem-solving.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This review highlighted a gap in the trajectory of “how” students cope with stress in clinical practice. Further research is needed to inform the development of personalized tools and skills that can be used by students.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46287,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Teaching and Learning in Nursing\",\"volume\":\"19 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 372-384\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1557308724001355/pdfft?md5=9ff18cba7f4d74879b67da146a199c16&pid=1-s2.0-S1557308724001355-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Teaching and Learning in Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1557308724001355\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching and Learning in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1557308724001355","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景临床环境中的学习可能会给护理专业学生带来压力。鉴于压力可能会影响学生的身心健康、学习能力和病人护理,因此必须建立有效的应对机制。本研究采用乔安娜-布里格斯研究所(Joanna Briggs Institute)的框架进行了范围界定综述。研究方法:使用 CINHAL、PubMed、PsycINFO、Google Scholar 和 Thesis Global 数据库以及祖先检索法对主要研究来源和学位论文进行检索。资格标准包括有关护理本科生在体验式学习环境中应对临床相关压力的主要研究。结果在总共 573 篇已确定的文章中,有 35 篇符合纳入标准。所纳入的研究主要采用定量设计,来自不同国家,关注不同年级学生的临床经验。最常用的应对机制是以问题为中心的方法。学生采用的应对策略往往被概念化为二分法,如有效或无效,而不是取决于具体情况。应对作为一个概念,主要是通过测量工具来探讨的,这限制了对学生解决问题过程的理解。需要进一步开展研究,为开发可供学生使用的个性化工具和技能提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Coping with clinical related stress experienced by undergraduate nursing students: A scoping review

Primary Objective

To identify the strategies used by undergraduate nursing students to cope with clinical related stress.

Background

Learning in the clinical environment may be stressful for nursing students. Effective coping mechanisms are imperative given that stress may compromise students’ well-being, ability to learn, and patient care. A scoping review was conducted using the Joanna Briggs Institute framework.

Method

Primary research sources and dissertations were searched using the CINHAL, PubMed, PsycINFO, Google Scholar, and Thesis Global databases as well as an ancestry approach. Eligibility criteria included primary research on undergraduate nursing students’ coping with clinical related stress in an experiential learning environment.

Results

From a total of 573 identified articles, 35 met the inclusion criteria. The included studies were primarily conducted using quantitative designs, originated from various countries, and focused on students’ clinical experiences from varying years. The most frequently used coping mechanism was problem-focused approaches. Coping strategies employed by students were often conceptualized as dichotomous, such as effective or in-effective, rather than dependent on contextual circumstances. Coping as a concept was primarily explored using measurement tools that limited understanding the processes students used to engage in problem-solving.

Conclusion

This review highlighted a gap in the trajectory of “how” students cope with stress in clinical practice. Further research is needed to inform the development of personalized tools and skills that can be used by students.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
10.50%
发文量
119
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Teaching and Learning in Nursing is the Official Journal of the National Organization of Associate Degree Nursing. The journal is dedicated to the advancement of Associate Degree Nursing education and practice, and promotes collaboration in charting the future of health care education and delivery. Topics include: - Managing Different Learning Styles - New Faculty Mentoring - Legal Issues - Research - Legislative Issues - Instructional Design Strategies - Leadership, Management Roles - Unique Funding for Programs and Faculty
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信