减少成年期实际情感与理想情感之间的差异:活动流的诱导性、愉悦感和熟悉感的作用。

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Da Jiang, Dwight C K Tse, Xianmin Gong, Vivian H L Tsang, Helene H Fung, Ajit S Mann, Jeanne Nakamura, Jeanne L Tsai
{"title":"减少成年期实际情感与理想情感之间的差异:活动流的诱导性、愉悦感和熟悉感的作用。","authors":"Da Jiang, Dwight C K Tse, Xianmin Gong, Vivian H L Tsang, Helene H Fung, Ajit S Mann, Jeanne Nakamura, Jeanne L Tsai","doi":"10.1080/02699931.2024.2367782","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous findings demonstrate that people often do not feel how they want to feel, supporting the distinction between \"actual affect\" and \"ideal affect.\" But are there certain activities that reduce the discrepancy between actual and ideal affect? Based on flow theory and socioemotional selectivity theory, we examined whether the discrepancy between people's actual and ideal positive affect would be smaller during activities that were more conducive to flow (a state of intense absorption and concentration), pleasant, and familiar. In Study 1, U.S. participants aged 17-79 (<i>N </i>= 393) reported their ideal affect and how they felt during activities with varying degrees of challenges and skills. For both low-arousal positive affect (LAP) and high-arousal positive affect (HAP), participants reported smaller actual-ideal affect discrepancies during flow-conducive activities (when skills matched challenges). Study 2 was a 14-day experience sampling study, in which Hong Kong participants aged 18-83 (<i>N</i><sub>individual</sub> = 109) reported their momentary actual and ideal affect, and how pleasant and familiar their activities were (<i>N</i><sub>experience </sub>= 3,815). Greater activity familiarity was associated with smaller discrepancies in actual-ideal LAP, while greater activity pleasantness was associated with smaller discrepancies in actual-ideal HAP. These findings provide insights on the activities that help people achieve their ideal affect more easily.</p>","PeriodicalId":48412,"journal":{"name":"Cognition & Emotion","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reducing discrepancies between actual and ideal affect across adulthood: the roles of activity flow conduciveness, pleasantness, and familiarity.\",\"authors\":\"Da Jiang, Dwight C K Tse, Xianmin Gong, Vivian H L Tsang, Helene H Fung, Ajit S Mann, Jeanne Nakamura, Jeanne L Tsai\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02699931.2024.2367782\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Previous findings demonstrate that people often do not feel how they want to feel, supporting the distinction between \\\"actual affect\\\" and \\\"ideal affect.\\\" But are there certain activities that reduce the discrepancy between actual and ideal affect? Based on flow theory and socioemotional selectivity theory, we examined whether the discrepancy between people's actual and ideal positive affect would be smaller during activities that were more conducive to flow (a state of intense absorption and concentration), pleasant, and familiar. In Study 1, U.S. participants aged 17-79 (<i>N </i>= 393) reported their ideal affect and how they felt during activities with varying degrees of challenges and skills. For both low-arousal positive affect (LAP) and high-arousal positive affect (HAP), participants reported smaller actual-ideal affect discrepancies during flow-conducive activities (when skills matched challenges). Study 2 was a 14-day experience sampling study, in which Hong Kong participants aged 18-83 (<i>N</i><sub>individual</sub> = 109) reported their momentary actual and ideal affect, and how pleasant and familiar their activities were (<i>N</i><sub>experience </sub>= 3,815). Greater activity familiarity was associated with smaller discrepancies in actual-ideal LAP, while greater activity pleasantness was associated with smaller discrepancies in actual-ideal HAP. These findings provide insights on the activities that help people achieve their ideal affect more easily.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48412,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognition & Emotion\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognition & Emotion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2024.2367782\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognition & Emotion","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2024.2367782","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以往的研究结果表明,人们往往无法感受到自己想要的感觉,这支持了 "实际情感 "和 "理想情感 "之间的区别。但是,是否有某些活动可以减少实际情感与理想情感之间的差异呢?基于流动理论和社会情感选择性理论,我们研究了在更有利于流动(一种高度集中和专注的状态)、令人愉悦和熟悉的活动中,人们的实际积极情感和理想积极情感之间的差异是否会更小。在研究 1 中,年龄在 17-79 岁之间的美国参与者(393 人)报告了他们的理想情感以及他们在具有不同程度挑战和技能的活动中的感受。对于低唤醒积极情感(LAP)和高唤醒积极情感(HAP),参与者报告说,在流动诱导活动中(当技能与挑战相匹配时),实际情感与理想情感的差异较小。研究 2 是一项为期 14 天的经验取样研究,18-83 岁的香港参与者(Nindividual = 109)报告了他们的瞬间实际情绪和理想情绪,以及活动的愉快程度和熟悉程度(Nexperience = 3,815)。活动熟悉程度越高,实际与理想情绪之间的差异越小;活动愉快程度越高,实际与理想情绪之间的差异越小。这些发现为我们提供了有关活动的见解,这些活动有助于人们更轻松地实现理想情感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reducing discrepancies between actual and ideal affect across adulthood: the roles of activity flow conduciveness, pleasantness, and familiarity.

Previous findings demonstrate that people often do not feel how they want to feel, supporting the distinction between "actual affect" and "ideal affect." But are there certain activities that reduce the discrepancy between actual and ideal affect? Based on flow theory and socioemotional selectivity theory, we examined whether the discrepancy between people's actual and ideal positive affect would be smaller during activities that were more conducive to flow (a state of intense absorption and concentration), pleasant, and familiar. In Study 1, U.S. participants aged 17-79 (N = 393) reported their ideal affect and how they felt during activities with varying degrees of challenges and skills. For both low-arousal positive affect (LAP) and high-arousal positive affect (HAP), participants reported smaller actual-ideal affect discrepancies during flow-conducive activities (when skills matched challenges). Study 2 was a 14-day experience sampling study, in which Hong Kong participants aged 18-83 (Nindividual = 109) reported their momentary actual and ideal affect, and how pleasant and familiar their activities were (Nexperience = 3,815). Greater activity familiarity was associated with smaller discrepancies in actual-ideal LAP, while greater activity pleasantness was associated with smaller discrepancies in actual-ideal HAP. These findings provide insights on the activities that help people achieve their ideal affect more easily.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cognition & Emotion
Cognition & Emotion PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
90
期刊介绍: Cognition & Emotion is devoted to the study of emotion, especially to those aspects of emotion related to cognitive processes. The journal aims to bring together work on emotion undertaken by researchers in cognitive, social, clinical, and developmental psychology, neuropsychology, and cognitive science. Examples of topics appropriate for the journal include the role of cognitive processes in emotion elicitation, regulation, and expression; the impact of emotion on attention, memory, learning, motivation, judgements, and decisions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信