Daniel Andrews, Simon Ducharme, Howard Chertkow, Maria Pia Sormani, D. Louis Collins, Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative
{"title":"在CLARITY AD研究中,莱卡奈单抗对男性的益处高于女性,这可能是由于真正的性别效应所致","authors":"Daniel Andrews, Simon Ducharme, Howard Chertkow, Maria Pia Sormani, D. Louis Collins, Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative","doi":"10.1101/2024.07.11.24310278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: The Phase 3 trial CLARITY AD found that lecanemab slowed cognitive decline by a statistically significant 27% vs. placebo. However, the subgroup analysis indicated a significant sex difference in the effect, and recent work has implied that lecanemab has either no or limited effectiveness in females. To resolve this ambiguity, we used simulations constrained by the trial design to determine whether the difference could be explained by known sex differences in Alzheimer's progression, or as an isolated random event.\nMETHODS: Simulations were generated using linear mixed models of cognitive decline fit to data from ADNI participants who satisfied CLARITY AD inclusion criteria. RESULTS: The statistically nonsignificant 7.9% sex difference in cognitive decline rate observed in our selected ADNI participants does not explain the trial's 31% sex difference in lecanemab's effect. A 31% difference occurred randomly in only 12 of our 10,000 simulations, signifying a probability of 0.0012. DISCUSSION: Our results are consistent with those from CLARITY AD. Lecanemab likely affects females and males differently, but we cannot conclude that the drug is ineffective in females.","PeriodicalId":501025,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Geriatric Medicine","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The higher benefit of lecanemab in males compared to females in CLARITY AD is probably due to a real sex effect\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Andrews, Simon Ducharme, Howard Chertkow, Maria Pia Sormani, D. Louis Collins, Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.07.11.24310278\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRODUCTION: The Phase 3 trial CLARITY AD found that lecanemab slowed cognitive decline by a statistically significant 27% vs. placebo. However, the subgroup analysis indicated a significant sex difference in the effect, and recent work has implied that lecanemab has either no or limited effectiveness in females. To resolve this ambiguity, we used simulations constrained by the trial design to determine whether the difference could be explained by known sex differences in Alzheimer's progression, or as an isolated random event.\\nMETHODS: Simulations were generated using linear mixed models of cognitive decline fit to data from ADNI participants who satisfied CLARITY AD inclusion criteria. RESULTS: The statistically nonsignificant 7.9% sex difference in cognitive decline rate observed in our selected ADNI participants does not explain the trial's 31% sex difference in lecanemab's effect. A 31% difference occurred randomly in only 12 of our 10,000 simulations, signifying a probability of 0.0012. DISCUSSION: Our results are consistent with those from CLARITY AD. Lecanemab likely affects females and males differently, but we cannot conclude that the drug is ineffective in females.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501025,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Geriatric Medicine\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Geriatric Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.11.24310278\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Geriatric Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.11.24310278","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The higher benefit of lecanemab in males compared to females in CLARITY AD is probably due to a real sex effect
INTRODUCTION: The Phase 3 trial CLARITY AD found that lecanemab slowed cognitive decline by a statistically significant 27% vs. placebo. However, the subgroup analysis indicated a significant sex difference in the effect, and recent work has implied that lecanemab has either no or limited effectiveness in females. To resolve this ambiguity, we used simulations constrained by the trial design to determine whether the difference could be explained by known sex differences in Alzheimer's progression, or as an isolated random event.
METHODS: Simulations were generated using linear mixed models of cognitive decline fit to data from ADNI participants who satisfied CLARITY AD inclusion criteria. RESULTS: The statistically nonsignificant 7.9% sex difference in cognitive decline rate observed in our selected ADNI participants does not explain the trial's 31% sex difference in lecanemab's effect. A 31% difference occurred randomly in only 12 of our 10,000 simulations, signifying a probability of 0.0012. DISCUSSION: Our results are consistent with those from CLARITY AD. Lecanemab likely affects females and males differently, but we cannot conclude that the drug is ineffective in females.