Tim Kirchhoff , Matthias Wilde , Christoph Randler , Nadine Großmann
{"title":"你是在学习还是在表演?使用 CEAS 模型比较学生在外联科学实验室和学校进行实验时的目标定位","authors":"Tim Kirchhoff , Matthias Wilde , Christoph Randler , Nadine Großmann","doi":"10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Many outreach science laboratories have been established in the fields of STEM to counteract negative developments in student motivation such as a decrease in mastery-approach goal orientation and an increase in avoidance-performance goal orientation. Studies to date have not yet addressed the question whether a visit to an outreach science laboratory could have a buffering or counteracting effect on these negative developments.</p></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><p>We investigated differences in students’ state goal orientations, state of interest, perceived need satisfaction, and perceived pressure when conducting experiments in an outreach science laboratory or at school.</p></div><div><h3>Sample</h3><p>Participants were 358 German school students (age: <em>M</em> = 16.43 years, <em>SD</em> = 0.76 years; gender: 58% female).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In a quasi-experimental study, the students conducted the same experiments at an outreach science laboratory (<em>n</em> = 186) or at school (<em>n</em> = 171) under local conditions.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The students in the outreach science laboratory perceived themselves as more competent, more related, and less pressured than the students at school. Their state of interest and perceived autonomy were similarly high. Furthermore, we found no differences in their state mastery-approach goal orientation, while the students in the outreach science laboratory exhibited lower performance goal orientations than the students at school.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our findings support the assumption that students may be motivated to learn about biological content in outreach science laboratories as at school, but with more competence perception and beyond performance pressure. Regarding the recent negative developments of student motivation, outreach science laboratories might be valuable complements to formal biology education.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48357,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Instruction","volume":"93 ","pages":"Article 101972"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475224000999/pdfft?md5=c5191ffe79860aa89bf1be7eb77ab776&pid=1-s2.0-S0959475224000999-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are you learning or performing? A comparison of students’ goal orientation during experimentation at an outreach science laboratory and at school using the CEAS model\",\"authors\":\"Tim Kirchhoff , Matthias Wilde , Christoph Randler , Nadine Großmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101972\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Many outreach science laboratories have been established in the fields of STEM to counteract negative developments in student motivation such as a decrease in mastery-approach goal orientation and an increase in avoidance-performance goal orientation. Studies to date have not yet addressed the question whether a visit to an outreach science laboratory could have a buffering or counteracting effect on these negative developments.</p></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><p>We investigated differences in students’ state goal orientations, state of interest, perceived need satisfaction, and perceived pressure when conducting experiments in an outreach science laboratory or at school.</p></div><div><h3>Sample</h3><p>Participants were 358 German school students (age: <em>M</em> = 16.43 years, <em>SD</em> = 0.76 years; gender: 58% female).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In a quasi-experimental study, the students conducted the same experiments at an outreach science laboratory (<em>n</em> = 186) or at school (<em>n</em> = 171) under local conditions.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The students in the outreach science laboratory perceived themselves as more competent, more related, and less pressured than the students at school. Their state of interest and perceived autonomy were similarly high. Furthermore, we found no differences in their state mastery-approach goal orientation, while the students in the outreach science laboratory exhibited lower performance goal orientations than the students at school.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our findings support the assumption that students may be motivated to learn about biological content in outreach science laboratories as at school, but with more competence perception and beyond performance pressure. Regarding the recent negative developments of student motivation, outreach science laboratories might be valuable complements to formal biology education.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learning and Instruction\",\"volume\":\"93 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101972\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475224000999/pdfft?md5=c5191ffe79860aa89bf1be7eb77ab776&pid=1-s2.0-S0959475224000999-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learning and Instruction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475224000999\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475224000999","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Are you learning or performing? A comparison of students’ goal orientation during experimentation at an outreach science laboratory and at school using the CEAS model
Background
Many outreach science laboratories have been established in the fields of STEM to counteract negative developments in student motivation such as a decrease in mastery-approach goal orientation and an increase in avoidance-performance goal orientation. Studies to date have not yet addressed the question whether a visit to an outreach science laboratory could have a buffering or counteracting effect on these negative developments.
Aims
We investigated differences in students’ state goal orientations, state of interest, perceived need satisfaction, and perceived pressure when conducting experiments in an outreach science laboratory or at school.
Sample
Participants were 358 German school students (age: M = 16.43 years, SD = 0.76 years; gender: 58% female).
Methods
In a quasi-experimental study, the students conducted the same experiments at an outreach science laboratory (n = 186) or at school (n = 171) under local conditions.
Results
The students in the outreach science laboratory perceived themselves as more competent, more related, and less pressured than the students at school. Their state of interest and perceived autonomy were similarly high. Furthermore, we found no differences in their state mastery-approach goal orientation, while the students in the outreach science laboratory exhibited lower performance goal orientations than the students at school.
Conclusions
Our findings support the assumption that students may be motivated to learn about biological content in outreach science laboratories as at school, but with more competence perception and beyond performance pressure. Regarding the recent negative developments of student motivation, outreach science laboratories might be valuable complements to formal biology education.
期刊介绍:
As an international, multi-disciplinary, peer-refereed journal, Learning and Instruction provides a platform for the publication of the most advanced scientific research in the areas of learning, development, instruction and teaching. The journal welcomes original empirical investigations. The papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and different methodological approaches. They may refer to any age level, from infants to adults and to a diversity of learning and instructional settings, from laboratory experiments to field studies. The major criteria in the review and the selection process concern the significance of the contribution to the area of learning and instruction, and the rigor of the study.