二十一世纪的就业制度

IF 1.3 2区 管理学 Q3 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR
Peter Gahan, Peter Turnbull
{"title":"二十一世纪的就业制度","authors":"Peter Gahan, Peter Turnbull","doi":"10.1111/bjir.12829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, we honour David Marsden's most important contribution: his <jats:italic>Theory of Employment Systems</jats:italic> (<jats:italic>ToES</jats:italic>). Grounded in standard economic analysis, <jats:italic>ToES</jats:italic> sets out to explain how a relatively small number of employment systems solve fundamental problems associated with open‐ended employment relationships (flexibility and opportunism). In the period since its publication, the employment relationship remains the dominant form of engaging workers; however, employment arrangements in the UK and elsewhere have been transformed, and employment systems in many settings more closely resemble configurations of rules that <jats:italic>ToES</jats:italic> predicted would prove unstable. While <jats:italic>ToES</jats:italic> does not explicitly integrate a number of important dimensions that define all aspects of employment systems, we show why Marsden's core theoretical insights retain analytical purchase as an explanatory framework. That said, taking a more sociologically and historically informed approach to understanding contemporary employment systems is required to comprehend the diversity of employment systems and how they evolve in the twenty‐first century.","PeriodicalId":47846,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Industrial Relations","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Employment systems in the twenty‐first century\",\"authors\":\"Peter Gahan, Peter Turnbull\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bjir.12829\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this article, we honour David Marsden's most important contribution: his <jats:italic>Theory of Employment Systems</jats:italic> (<jats:italic>ToES</jats:italic>). Grounded in standard economic analysis, <jats:italic>ToES</jats:italic> sets out to explain how a relatively small number of employment systems solve fundamental problems associated with open‐ended employment relationships (flexibility and opportunism). In the period since its publication, the employment relationship remains the dominant form of engaging workers; however, employment arrangements in the UK and elsewhere have been transformed, and employment systems in many settings more closely resemble configurations of rules that <jats:italic>ToES</jats:italic> predicted would prove unstable. While <jats:italic>ToES</jats:italic> does not explicitly integrate a number of important dimensions that define all aspects of employment systems, we show why Marsden's core theoretical insights retain analytical purchase as an explanatory framework. That said, taking a more sociologically and historically informed approach to understanding contemporary employment systems is required to comprehend the diversity of employment systems and how they evolve in the twenty‐first century.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47846,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Industrial Relations\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Industrial Relations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjir.12829\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Industrial Relations","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjir.12829","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文将介绍戴维-马斯登最重要的贡献:他的就业制度理论(ToES)。该理论以标准经济分析为基础,旨在解释相对较少的雇佣制度如何解决与开放式雇佣关系(灵活性和机会主义)相关的基本问题。自该著作出版以来,雇佣关系仍是吸引工人的主要形式;然而,英国和其他国家的雇佣安排已经发生了变化,许多环境中的雇佣制度更接近于 ToES 预测的不稳定规则配置。尽管 ToES 并未明确整合界定就业体系各个方面的一些重要维度,但我们还是要说明为什么马斯登的核心理论见解作为一种解释框架仍然具有分析价值。尽管如此,要理解就业制度的多样性及其在 21 世纪的演变,还需要采取一种更具社会学和历史学意义的方法来理解当代就业制度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Employment systems in the twenty‐first century
In this article, we honour David Marsden's most important contribution: his Theory of Employment Systems (ToES). Grounded in standard economic analysis, ToES sets out to explain how a relatively small number of employment systems solve fundamental problems associated with open‐ended employment relationships (flexibility and opportunism). In the period since its publication, the employment relationship remains the dominant form of engaging workers; however, employment arrangements in the UK and elsewhere have been transformed, and employment systems in many settings more closely resemble configurations of rules that ToES predicted would prove unstable. While ToES does not explicitly integrate a number of important dimensions that define all aspects of employment systems, we show why Marsden's core theoretical insights retain analytical purchase as an explanatory framework. That said, taking a more sociologically and historically informed approach to understanding contemporary employment systems is required to comprehend the diversity of employment systems and how they evolve in the twenty‐first century.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Industrial Relations
British Journal of Industrial Relations INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
11.50%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: BJIR (British Journal of Industrial Relations) is an influential and authoritative journal which is essential reading for all academics and practitioners interested in work and employment relations. It is the highest ranked European journal in the Industrial Relations & Labour category of the Social Sciences Citation Index. BJIR aims to present the latest research on developments on employment and work from across the globe that appeal to an international readership. Contributions are drawn from all of the main social science disciplines, deal with a broad range of employment topics and express a range of viewpoints.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信