模拟训练对医学本科生核心技能能力的影响。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
{"title":"模拟训练对医学本科生核心技能能力的影响。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.06.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Simulation based medical training (SBMT) is gaining traction for undergraduate learning and development. We designed, implemented, and independently assessed the impact of an SBMT programme on competency in surgical history taking and clinical examination for senior clinical students.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>With institutional ethical approval and initial pilot study of student volunteers that ensured format appropriateness, we implemented an SBMT programme weekly for ten weeks during the core surgery module of our Medicine degree programme. Groups of 5 students collaboratively undertook an observed focused history and physical examination while simultaneously directing care on a simulated surgical patient (actor) with acute abdominal pain. This was conducted in a nonclinical, standardised, tutor-supervised environment and followed by a group debriefing led by both the simulated patient and tutor discussing student interaction and competency. All students undertook Southampton Medical Assessment Tool (SMAT) on a surgical inpatient prior to (baseline) and within 2 weeks after SBMT. Students without simulation training functioned as a control group and randomized cluster sampling was utilised for group selection. Second assessments were by independent surgical academics blinded to student group. Feedback was collected via anonymous questionnaire from those who undertook SBMT.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>One hundred students took part, fifty of whom undertook SBMT. Global mean SMAT scores were similar between the control and intervention group at baseline (p &gt; 0.05). Scores on the second assessment were significantly higher (p = 0.0006) for those who had undertaken SBMT vs. controls; 94% of students taking SBMT reported benefit via questionnaire with 85% stating increased confidence in history-taking and 78% reporting improved abdominal examination.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Undergraduate simulation training at scale is feasible and positively impacts undergraduate student core task competency.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50033,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1931720424002782/pdfft?md5=449fedf47b7b3e2d3199b6b6ff76fc31&pid=1-s2.0-S1931720424002782-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Simulation Training on Core Skill Competency of Undergraduate Medical Students\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.06.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Simulation based medical training (SBMT) is gaining traction for undergraduate learning and development. We designed, implemented, and independently assessed the impact of an SBMT programme on competency in surgical history taking and clinical examination for senior clinical students.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>With institutional ethical approval and initial pilot study of student volunteers that ensured format appropriateness, we implemented an SBMT programme weekly for ten weeks during the core surgery module of our Medicine degree programme. Groups of 5 students collaboratively undertook an observed focused history and physical examination while simultaneously directing care on a simulated surgical patient (actor) with acute abdominal pain. This was conducted in a nonclinical, standardised, tutor-supervised environment and followed by a group debriefing led by both the simulated patient and tutor discussing student interaction and competency. All students undertook Southampton Medical Assessment Tool (SMAT) on a surgical inpatient prior to (baseline) and within 2 weeks after SBMT. Students without simulation training functioned as a control group and randomized cluster sampling was utilised for group selection. Second assessments were by independent surgical academics blinded to student group. Feedback was collected via anonymous questionnaire from those who undertook SBMT.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>One hundred students took part, fifty of whom undertook SBMT. Global mean SMAT scores were similar between the control and intervention group at baseline (p &gt; 0.05). Scores on the second assessment were significantly higher (p = 0.0006) for those who had undertaken SBMT vs. controls; 94% of students taking SBMT reported benefit via questionnaire with 85% stating increased confidence in history-taking and 78% reporting improved abdominal examination.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Undergraduate simulation training at scale is feasible and positively impacts undergraduate student core task competency.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Surgical Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1931720424002782/pdfft?md5=449fedf47b7b3e2d3199b6b6ff76fc31&pid=1-s2.0-S1931720424002782-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Surgical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1931720424002782\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1931720424002782","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:模拟医学培训(SBMT)在本科生的学习和发展中越来越受到重视。我们设计、实施并独立评估了 SBMT 课程对高年级临床学生外科病史采集和临床检查能力的影响:方法:在获得机构伦理批准并对学生志愿者进行初步试点研究以确保形式的适当性后,我们在医学学位课程的核心外科模块中实施了每周一次的 SBMT 课程,为期 10 周。5 名学生为一组,合作进行重点病史观察和体格检查,同时指导护理一名急性腹痛的模拟外科患者(演员)。这是在非临床、标准化、导师监督的环境中进行的,随后由模拟病人和导师主持小组汇报,讨论学生的互动和能力。在 SBMT 之前(基线)和之后两周内,所有学生都对外科住院病人进行了南安普顿医学评估工具 (SMAT)。未接受过模拟训练的学生作为对照组,采用随机分组抽样的方式进行分组。第二次评估由独立的外科学者进行,并对学生组别设置盲区。通过匿名调查问卷收集参加模拟训练的学生的反馈意见:结果:100 名学生参加了评估,其中 50 人接受了 SBMT。基线时,对照组和干预组的 SMAT 总平均分相似(P > 0.05)。与对照组相比,接受过 SBMT 培训的学生在第二次评估中的得分明显更高(p = 0.0006);94% 接受过 SBMT 培训的学生通过调查问卷表示受益匪浅,其中 85% 表示对病史采集的信心有所增强,78% 表示腹部检查有所改善:结论:大规模的本科生模拟训练是可行的,并能对本科生的核心任务能力产生积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of Simulation Training on Core Skill Competency of Undergraduate Medical Students

Introduction

Simulation based medical training (SBMT) is gaining traction for undergraduate learning and development. We designed, implemented, and independently assessed the impact of an SBMT programme on competency in surgical history taking and clinical examination for senior clinical students.

Methods

With institutional ethical approval and initial pilot study of student volunteers that ensured format appropriateness, we implemented an SBMT programme weekly for ten weeks during the core surgery module of our Medicine degree programme. Groups of 5 students collaboratively undertook an observed focused history and physical examination while simultaneously directing care on a simulated surgical patient (actor) with acute abdominal pain. This was conducted in a nonclinical, standardised, tutor-supervised environment and followed by a group debriefing led by both the simulated patient and tutor discussing student interaction and competency. All students undertook Southampton Medical Assessment Tool (SMAT) on a surgical inpatient prior to (baseline) and within 2 weeks after SBMT. Students without simulation training functioned as a control group and randomized cluster sampling was utilised for group selection. Second assessments were by independent surgical academics blinded to student group. Feedback was collected via anonymous questionnaire from those who undertook SBMT.

Results

One hundred students took part, fifty of whom undertook SBMT. Global mean SMAT scores were similar between the control and intervention group at baseline (p > 0.05). Scores on the second assessment were significantly higher (p = 0.0006) for those who had undertaken SBMT vs. controls; 94% of students taking SBMT reported benefit via questionnaire with 85% stating increased confidence in history-taking and 78% reporting improved abdominal examination.

Conclusions

Undergraduate simulation training at scale is feasible and positively impacts undergraduate student core task competency.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Surgical Education
Journal of Surgical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-SURGERY
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
10.30%
发文量
261
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Education (JSE) is dedicated to advancing the field of surgical education through original research. The journal publishes research articles in all surgical disciplines on topics relative to the education of surgical students, residents, and fellows, as well as practicing surgeons. Our readers look to JSE for timely, innovative research findings from the international surgical education community. As the official journal of the Association of Program Directors in Surgery (APDS), JSE publishes the proceedings of the annual APDS meeting held during Surgery Education Week.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信