当代中国家庭主义量表的开发和初步验证。

IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 ETHNIC STUDIES
Yanyu Xia, Rui Fu, Dan Li, Lingling Wu, Xiaopeng Chen, Bohan Sun
{"title":"当代中国家庭主义量表的开发和初步验证。","authors":"Yanyu Xia, Rui Fu, Dan Li, Lingling Wu, Xiaopeng Chen, Bohan Sun","doi":"10.1037/cdp0000682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Familism is a core ideology in Chinese society, yet it has been understudied in this cultural context, potentially attributed to the lack of quantifiable measures. This study sought to develop a reliable and valid scale, the Contemporary Chinese Familism Scale (CCFS), to assess Chinese familism and analyze its structural and psychological characteristics in contemporary China.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The scale development and validation process comprised four studies: in Study 1, literature review, qualitative interviews, and item evaluations by experts were conducted to develop the initial item pool for the CCFS; in Studies 2 and 3, item analysis, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, competing model comparisons, and measurement invariance tests were conducted to examine the structure underlying familism (<i>N</i>₁ = 958, <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 25.4 years; <i>N</i>₂ = 570, <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 32.01 years); in Study 4, reliability and validity assessments were conducted to further explore the psychometric properties of the final 27-item CCFS using three samples (<i>N</i>₂ = 570, <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 32.01 years; <i>N</i>₃ = 710, <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 22.37 years; <i>N</i>₄ = 932, <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 40.98 years).</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>A bifactor structure with one general factor and five specific factors (Connection and Closeness, Offspring and Lineage, Honor and Reference, Harmony and Sacrifice, and Care and Help) demonstrated the best fit for the data and supported the multidimensionality of familism in contemporary China. Subsequent psychometric analyses provided initial evidence for the optimal psychometric properties of the CCFS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study contributes to our understanding of the multifaceted nature of familism in contemporary China by developing a culturally sensitive scale on Chinese familism. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48151,"journal":{"name":"Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and initial validation of the contemporary Chinese Familism Scale.\",\"authors\":\"Yanyu Xia, Rui Fu, Dan Li, Lingling Wu, Xiaopeng Chen, Bohan Sun\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/cdp0000682\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Familism is a core ideology in Chinese society, yet it has been understudied in this cultural context, potentially attributed to the lack of quantifiable measures. This study sought to develop a reliable and valid scale, the Contemporary Chinese Familism Scale (CCFS), to assess Chinese familism and analyze its structural and psychological characteristics in contemporary China.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The scale development and validation process comprised four studies: in Study 1, literature review, qualitative interviews, and item evaluations by experts were conducted to develop the initial item pool for the CCFS; in Studies 2 and 3, item analysis, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, competing model comparisons, and measurement invariance tests were conducted to examine the structure underlying familism (<i>N</i>₁ = 958, <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 25.4 years; <i>N</i>₂ = 570, <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 32.01 years); in Study 4, reliability and validity assessments were conducted to further explore the psychometric properties of the final 27-item CCFS using three samples (<i>N</i>₂ = 570, <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 32.01 years; <i>N</i>₃ = 710, <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 22.37 years; <i>N</i>₄ = 932, <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 40.98 years).</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>A bifactor structure with one general factor and five specific factors (Connection and Closeness, Offspring and Lineage, Honor and Reference, Harmony and Sacrifice, and Care and Help) demonstrated the best fit for the data and supported the multidimensionality of familism in contemporary China. Subsequent psychometric analyses provided initial evidence for the optimal psychometric properties of the CCFS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study contributes to our understanding of the multifaceted nature of familism in contemporary China by developing a culturally sensitive scale on Chinese familism. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48151,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000682\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHNIC STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000682","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHNIC STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的家庭主义是中国社会的核心意识形态,但在这种文化背景下,家庭主义却一直未得到充分研究,这可能是由于缺乏可量化的测量方法。本研究试图开发一个可靠有效的量表,即当代中国家庭主义量表(CCFS),以评估中国家庭主义,并分析其在当代中国的结构和心理特征:量表的编制和验证过程包括四项研究:研究 1:通过文献回顾、定性访谈和专家项目评估,编制 CCFS 的初始项目库;研究 2 和研究 3:通过项目分析、探索性和确认性因子分析、竞争模型比较和测量不变量检验,考察家庭主义的基本结构(N₁ = 958,Mage = 25.在研究 4 中,使用三个样本(N₂ = 570,Mage = 32.01 岁;N₃ = 710,Mage = 22.37 岁;N₄ = 932,Mage = 40.98 岁)进行了信度和效度评估,以进一步探索最终的 27 个项目 CCFS 的心理测量特性:结果:由一个总因子和五个具体因子(联系与亲近、后代与血脉、荣誉与参照、和谐与牺牲、关怀与帮助)组成的双因子结构对数据进行了最佳拟合,并支持了当代中国家庭主义的多维性。随后的心理测量学分析为 CCFS 的最佳心理测量特性提供了初步证据:本研究通过编制一个具有文化敏感性的中国家庭主义量表,有助于我们了解当代中国家庭主义的多面性。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development and initial validation of the contemporary Chinese Familism Scale.

Objectives: Familism is a core ideology in Chinese society, yet it has been understudied in this cultural context, potentially attributed to the lack of quantifiable measures. This study sought to develop a reliable and valid scale, the Contemporary Chinese Familism Scale (CCFS), to assess Chinese familism and analyze its structural and psychological characteristics in contemporary China.

Method: The scale development and validation process comprised four studies: in Study 1, literature review, qualitative interviews, and item evaluations by experts were conducted to develop the initial item pool for the CCFS; in Studies 2 and 3, item analysis, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, competing model comparisons, and measurement invariance tests were conducted to examine the structure underlying familism (N₁ = 958, Mage = 25.4 years; N₂ = 570, Mage = 32.01 years); in Study 4, reliability and validity assessments were conducted to further explore the psychometric properties of the final 27-item CCFS using three samples (N₂ = 570, Mage = 32.01 years; N₃ = 710, Mage = 22.37 years; N₄ = 932, Mage = 40.98 years).

Result: A bifactor structure with one general factor and five specific factors (Connection and Closeness, Offspring and Lineage, Honor and Reference, Harmony and Sacrifice, and Care and Help) demonstrated the best fit for the data and supported the multidimensionality of familism in contemporary China. Subsequent psychometric analyses provided initial evidence for the optimal psychometric properties of the CCFS.

Conclusion: This study contributes to our understanding of the multifaceted nature of familism in contemporary China by developing a culturally sensitive scale on Chinese familism. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
101
期刊介绍: Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology seeks to publish theoretical, conceptual, research, and case study articles that promote the development of knowledge and understanding, application of psychological principles, and scholarly analysis of social–political forces affecting racial and ethnic minorities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信