数字化对学习写作的影响--一项自然主义实验

IF 4.7 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Wenke Mork Rogne , Vibeke Rønneberg , Siv M. Gamlem , Eivor Finset Spilling , Per Henning Uppstad
{"title":"数字化对学习写作的影响--一项自然主义实验","authors":"Wenke Mork Rogne ,&nbsp;Vibeke Rønneberg ,&nbsp;Siv M. Gamlem ,&nbsp;Eivor Finset Spilling ,&nbsp;Per Henning Uppstad","doi":"10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101970","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Students’ writing is being digitised to a different degree across countries, municipalities, and schools. Yet, knowledge on the effect of digitalisation remains scarce. Due to local autonomy over instructional methods, Norwegian schools portray a full array of this global diversity of practices, representing a unique naturalistic setting of digitisation, with other factors being held relatively constant.</p></div><div><h3>Research aims</h3><p>The study explores how elementary students’ writing is affected by to what degree students’ writing involves using digital tools and/or handwriting over the first year in school.</p></div><div><h3>Sample</h3><p>A total of 577 Norwegian first grade students (6 years).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In a natural experiment, students were tested for spelling ability (dictation) and for narrative text writing ability. Students wrote one text by hand and one text on a digital device and handwritten and typed texts were analysed for handwriting legibility, holistic quality, text length and compositional spelling. The statistical analysis was performed using Linear mixed-effects models.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The results show that students from classes with a higher degree of digitalisation wrote longer texts with more words correctly spelled when writing on a digital device, compared to others. However, students from classes where more writing was done by hand performed better on handwriting measures.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>We suggest that both modes convey writing proficiency, each with its specific benefits.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48357,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Instruction","volume":"93 ","pages":"Article 101970"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475224000975/pdfft?md5=f655585c1d40d5dc875262a1b5ac959a&pid=1-s2.0-S0959475224000975-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of digitalisation on learning to write – A naturalistic experiment\",\"authors\":\"Wenke Mork Rogne ,&nbsp;Vibeke Rønneberg ,&nbsp;Siv M. Gamlem ,&nbsp;Eivor Finset Spilling ,&nbsp;Per Henning Uppstad\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101970\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Students’ writing is being digitised to a different degree across countries, municipalities, and schools. Yet, knowledge on the effect of digitalisation remains scarce. Due to local autonomy over instructional methods, Norwegian schools portray a full array of this global diversity of practices, representing a unique naturalistic setting of digitisation, with other factors being held relatively constant.</p></div><div><h3>Research aims</h3><p>The study explores how elementary students’ writing is affected by to what degree students’ writing involves using digital tools and/or handwriting over the first year in school.</p></div><div><h3>Sample</h3><p>A total of 577 Norwegian first grade students (6 years).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In a natural experiment, students were tested for spelling ability (dictation) and for narrative text writing ability. Students wrote one text by hand and one text on a digital device and handwritten and typed texts were analysed for handwriting legibility, holistic quality, text length and compositional spelling. The statistical analysis was performed using Linear mixed-effects models.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The results show that students from classes with a higher degree of digitalisation wrote longer texts with more words correctly spelled when writing on a digital device, compared to others. However, students from classes where more writing was done by hand performed better on handwriting measures.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>We suggest that both modes convey writing proficiency, each with its specific benefits.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learning and Instruction\",\"volume\":\"93 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101970\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475224000975/pdfft?md5=f655585c1d40d5dc875262a1b5ac959a&pid=1-s2.0-S0959475224000975-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learning and Instruction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475224000975\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475224000975","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景各国、各城市和各学校都在不同程度上实现了学生写作的数字化。然而,有关数字化影响的知识仍然很少。在其他因素保持相对不变的情况下,挪威的学校由于在教学方法上拥有地方自主权,因此全面反映了这一全球实践的多样性,代表了一种独特的数字化自然环境。研究目的这项研究探讨了小学生在入学第一年中使用数字工具和/或手写的程度对他们的写作有何影响。学生们用手写和数字设备各写一篇文章,并对手写和打字文章的字迹清晰度、整体质量、文章长度和组合拼写进行分析。结果显示,与其他学生相比,数字化程度较高的班级的学生在使用数字设备书写时,书写的文字较长,拼写正确的单词较多。结论我们认为,两种模式都能提高书写能力,但各有利弊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of digitalisation on learning to write – A naturalistic experiment

Background

Students’ writing is being digitised to a different degree across countries, municipalities, and schools. Yet, knowledge on the effect of digitalisation remains scarce. Due to local autonomy over instructional methods, Norwegian schools portray a full array of this global diversity of practices, representing a unique naturalistic setting of digitisation, with other factors being held relatively constant.

Research aims

The study explores how elementary students’ writing is affected by to what degree students’ writing involves using digital tools and/or handwriting over the first year in school.

Sample

A total of 577 Norwegian first grade students (6 years).

Methods

In a natural experiment, students were tested for spelling ability (dictation) and for narrative text writing ability. Students wrote one text by hand and one text on a digital device and handwritten and typed texts were analysed for handwriting legibility, holistic quality, text length and compositional spelling. The statistical analysis was performed using Linear mixed-effects models.

Results

The results show that students from classes with a higher degree of digitalisation wrote longer texts with more words correctly spelled when writing on a digital device, compared to others. However, students from classes where more writing was done by hand performed better on handwriting measures.

Conclusions

We suggest that both modes convey writing proficiency, each with its specific benefits.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: As an international, multi-disciplinary, peer-refereed journal, Learning and Instruction provides a platform for the publication of the most advanced scientific research in the areas of learning, development, instruction and teaching. The journal welcomes original empirical investigations. The papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and different methodological approaches. They may refer to any age level, from infants to adults and to a diversity of learning and instructional settings, from laboratory experiments to field studies. The major criteria in the review and the selection process concern the significance of the contribution to the area of learning and instruction, and the rigor of the study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信