Wenke Mork Rogne , Vibeke Rønneberg , Siv M. Gamlem , Eivor Finset Spilling , Per Henning Uppstad
{"title":"数字化对学习写作的影响--一项自然主义实验","authors":"Wenke Mork Rogne , Vibeke Rønneberg , Siv M. Gamlem , Eivor Finset Spilling , Per Henning Uppstad","doi":"10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101970","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Students’ writing is being digitised to a different degree across countries, municipalities, and schools. Yet, knowledge on the effect of digitalisation remains scarce. Due to local autonomy over instructional methods, Norwegian schools portray a full array of this global diversity of practices, representing a unique naturalistic setting of digitisation, with other factors being held relatively constant.</p></div><div><h3>Research aims</h3><p>The study explores how elementary students’ writing is affected by to what degree students’ writing involves using digital tools and/or handwriting over the first year in school.</p></div><div><h3>Sample</h3><p>A total of 577 Norwegian first grade students (6 years).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In a natural experiment, students were tested for spelling ability (dictation) and for narrative text writing ability. Students wrote one text by hand and one text on a digital device and handwritten and typed texts were analysed for handwriting legibility, holistic quality, text length and compositional spelling. The statistical analysis was performed using Linear mixed-effects models.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The results show that students from classes with a higher degree of digitalisation wrote longer texts with more words correctly spelled when writing on a digital device, compared to others. However, students from classes where more writing was done by hand performed better on handwriting measures.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>We suggest that both modes convey writing proficiency, each with its specific benefits.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48357,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Instruction","volume":"93 ","pages":"Article 101970"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475224000975/pdfft?md5=f655585c1d40d5dc875262a1b5ac959a&pid=1-s2.0-S0959475224000975-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of digitalisation on learning to write – A naturalistic experiment\",\"authors\":\"Wenke Mork Rogne , Vibeke Rønneberg , Siv M. Gamlem , Eivor Finset Spilling , Per Henning Uppstad\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101970\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Students’ writing is being digitised to a different degree across countries, municipalities, and schools. Yet, knowledge on the effect of digitalisation remains scarce. Due to local autonomy over instructional methods, Norwegian schools portray a full array of this global diversity of practices, representing a unique naturalistic setting of digitisation, with other factors being held relatively constant.</p></div><div><h3>Research aims</h3><p>The study explores how elementary students’ writing is affected by to what degree students’ writing involves using digital tools and/or handwriting over the first year in school.</p></div><div><h3>Sample</h3><p>A total of 577 Norwegian first grade students (6 years).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In a natural experiment, students were tested for spelling ability (dictation) and for narrative text writing ability. Students wrote one text by hand and one text on a digital device and handwritten and typed texts were analysed for handwriting legibility, holistic quality, text length and compositional spelling. The statistical analysis was performed using Linear mixed-effects models.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The results show that students from classes with a higher degree of digitalisation wrote longer texts with more words correctly spelled when writing on a digital device, compared to others. However, students from classes where more writing was done by hand performed better on handwriting measures.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>We suggest that both modes convey writing proficiency, each with its specific benefits.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learning and Instruction\",\"volume\":\"93 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101970\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475224000975/pdfft?md5=f655585c1d40d5dc875262a1b5ac959a&pid=1-s2.0-S0959475224000975-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learning and Instruction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475224000975\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475224000975","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effects of digitalisation on learning to write – A naturalistic experiment
Background
Students’ writing is being digitised to a different degree across countries, municipalities, and schools. Yet, knowledge on the effect of digitalisation remains scarce. Due to local autonomy over instructional methods, Norwegian schools portray a full array of this global diversity of practices, representing a unique naturalistic setting of digitisation, with other factors being held relatively constant.
Research aims
The study explores how elementary students’ writing is affected by to what degree students’ writing involves using digital tools and/or handwriting over the first year in school.
Sample
A total of 577 Norwegian first grade students (6 years).
Methods
In a natural experiment, students were tested for spelling ability (dictation) and for narrative text writing ability. Students wrote one text by hand and one text on a digital device and handwritten and typed texts were analysed for handwriting legibility, holistic quality, text length and compositional spelling. The statistical analysis was performed using Linear mixed-effects models.
Results
The results show that students from classes with a higher degree of digitalisation wrote longer texts with more words correctly spelled when writing on a digital device, compared to others. However, students from classes where more writing was done by hand performed better on handwriting measures.
Conclusions
We suggest that both modes convey writing proficiency, each with its specific benefits.
期刊介绍:
As an international, multi-disciplinary, peer-refereed journal, Learning and Instruction provides a platform for the publication of the most advanced scientific research in the areas of learning, development, instruction and teaching. The journal welcomes original empirical investigations. The papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and different methodological approaches. They may refer to any age level, from infants to adults and to a diversity of learning and instructional settings, from laboratory experiments to field studies. The major criteria in the review and the selection process concern the significance of the contribution to the area of learning and instruction, and the rigor of the study.