在澳大利亚药品福利计划上市后的前八个月中,为 COVID-19 患者供应的 nirmatrelvir/ritonavir 和 molnupiravir:回顾性观察研究。

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Derrick Lopez , Douglas Pritchard , Frank M. Sanfilippo , Erin Kelty , Amy Page , Christopher Etherton-Beer , Osvaldo P. Almeida , David B. Preen
{"title":"在澳大利亚药品福利计划上市后的前八个月中,为 COVID-19 患者供应的 nirmatrelvir/ritonavir 和 molnupiravir:回顾性观察研究。","authors":"Derrick Lopez ,&nbsp;Douglas Pritchard ,&nbsp;Frank M. Sanfilippo ,&nbsp;Erin Kelty ,&nbsp;Amy Page ,&nbsp;Christopher Etherton-Beer ,&nbsp;Osvaldo P. Almeida ,&nbsp;David B. Preen","doi":"10.1016/j.idnow.2024.104953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To compare the supply of molnupiravir and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir in relation to patient characteristics and other co-prescribed medicines and to estimate the number of patients without contraindications to nirmatrelvir/ritonavir who were treated with molnupiravir.</p></div><div><h3>Study design, setting</h3><p>Retrospective observational study of patients identified in the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) 10 % sample dataset who were supplied with either molnupiravir or nirmatrelvir/ritonavir between May and December 2022. We supplemented the PBS dataset with aggregated counts from published literature to determine prevalence of clinical contraindications to nirmatrelvir/ritonavir.</p></div><div><h3>Main outcome measures</h3><p>We used multivariable Poisson regression to estimate risk ratios (RR) of receiving nirmatrelvir/ritonavir over molnupiravir.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We identified 54,550 patients who received either nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (26.8 %) or molnupiravir (73.2 %). Their average age was 71.6 (SD = 13.4) years and 57.1 % were female. Patients were less likely to receive nirmatrelvir/ritonavir with increasing age (RR = 0.50; 95 % CI: 0.48–0.53; for ages 85 + compared to &lt; 65 years) or who had received medicines contraindicated for use with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (RR = 0.66; 95 % CI: 0.64–0.68). During the study period, we estimated that between 28.4 % and 45.4 % of patients aged ≥ 65 years had received molnupiravir in the absence of pharmacological and clinical contraindications to nirmatrelvir/ritonavir.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Many prescriptions were written for molnupiravir where there were no contraindications to nirmatrelvir/ritonavir. The benefits that followed from prompt government action in approving and obtaining nirmatrelvir/ritonavir were therefore likely to be less than they could potentially have been. Governments should consider investing in quality improvement systems to ensure the best outcomes in terms of efficacy and safety.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":13539,"journal":{"name":"Infectious diseases now","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666991924001209/pdfft?md5=01e404726ea452d9411fe60ff92f876a&pid=1-s2.0-S2666991924001209-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Supply of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and molnupiravir for patients with COVID-19 in the first eight months since listing on the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme: A retrospective observational study\",\"authors\":\"Derrick Lopez ,&nbsp;Douglas Pritchard ,&nbsp;Frank M. Sanfilippo ,&nbsp;Erin Kelty ,&nbsp;Amy Page ,&nbsp;Christopher Etherton-Beer ,&nbsp;Osvaldo P. Almeida ,&nbsp;David B. Preen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.idnow.2024.104953\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To compare the supply of molnupiravir and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir in relation to patient characteristics and other co-prescribed medicines and to estimate the number of patients without contraindications to nirmatrelvir/ritonavir who were treated with molnupiravir.</p></div><div><h3>Study design, setting</h3><p>Retrospective observational study of patients identified in the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) 10 % sample dataset who were supplied with either molnupiravir or nirmatrelvir/ritonavir between May and December 2022. We supplemented the PBS dataset with aggregated counts from published literature to determine prevalence of clinical contraindications to nirmatrelvir/ritonavir.</p></div><div><h3>Main outcome measures</h3><p>We used multivariable Poisson regression to estimate risk ratios (RR) of receiving nirmatrelvir/ritonavir over molnupiravir.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We identified 54,550 patients who received either nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (26.8 %) or molnupiravir (73.2 %). Their average age was 71.6 (SD = 13.4) years and 57.1 % were female. Patients were less likely to receive nirmatrelvir/ritonavir with increasing age (RR = 0.50; 95 % CI: 0.48–0.53; for ages 85 + compared to &lt; 65 years) or who had received medicines contraindicated for use with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (RR = 0.66; 95 % CI: 0.64–0.68). During the study period, we estimated that between 28.4 % and 45.4 % of patients aged ≥ 65 years had received molnupiravir in the absence of pharmacological and clinical contraindications to nirmatrelvir/ritonavir.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Many prescriptions were written for molnupiravir where there were no contraindications to nirmatrelvir/ritonavir. The benefits that followed from prompt government action in approving and obtaining nirmatrelvir/ritonavir were therefore likely to be less than they could potentially have been. Governments should consider investing in quality improvement systems to ensure the best outcomes in terms of efficacy and safety.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13539,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infectious diseases now\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666991924001209/pdfft?md5=01e404726ea452d9411fe60ff92f876a&pid=1-s2.0-S2666991924001209-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infectious diseases now\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666991924001209\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious diseases now","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666991924001209","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的比较莫仑匹韦和尼马瑞韦/利托那韦的供应量与患者特征和其他联合处方药物的关系,并估计无尼马瑞韦/利托那韦禁忌症但接受了莫仑匹韦治疗的患者人数:对药品福利计划(PBS)10%抽样数据集中确定的在2022年5月至12月期间接受过莫仑吡韦或尼马瑞韦/利托那韦治疗的患者进行回顾性观察研究。我们对 PBS 数据集进行了补充,并汇总了已发表文献中的计数,以确定尼马瑞韦/利托那韦临床禁忌症的流行率:我们使用多变量泊松回归来估计接受尼尔马特韦/利托那韦治疗的风险比(RR):我们发现有 54,550 名患者接受了 nirmatrelvir/ritonavir(26.8%)或 molnupiravir(73.2%)治疗。他们的平均年龄为 71.6 (SD = 13.4) 岁,57.1% 为女性。随着年龄的增长,患者接受 nirmatrelvir/ritonavir 治疗的可能性降低(RR = 0.50;95 % CI:0.48-0.53;85 岁以上与结论相比):许多处方都是在没有禁忌症的情况下开具的莫仑拉韦处方。因此,政府迅速采取行动批准和获得 nirmatrelvir/ritonavir 所带来的益处可能低于其可能带来的益处。各国政府应考虑对质量改进系统进行投资,以确保在疗效和安全性方面取得最佳成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Supply of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and molnupiravir for patients with COVID-19 in the first eight months since listing on the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme: A retrospective observational study

Objectives

To compare the supply of molnupiravir and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir in relation to patient characteristics and other co-prescribed medicines and to estimate the number of patients without contraindications to nirmatrelvir/ritonavir who were treated with molnupiravir.

Study design, setting

Retrospective observational study of patients identified in the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) 10 % sample dataset who were supplied with either molnupiravir or nirmatrelvir/ritonavir between May and December 2022. We supplemented the PBS dataset with aggregated counts from published literature to determine prevalence of clinical contraindications to nirmatrelvir/ritonavir.

Main outcome measures

We used multivariable Poisson regression to estimate risk ratios (RR) of receiving nirmatrelvir/ritonavir over molnupiravir.

Results

We identified 54,550 patients who received either nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (26.8 %) or molnupiravir (73.2 %). Their average age was 71.6 (SD = 13.4) years and 57.1 % were female. Patients were less likely to receive nirmatrelvir/ritonavir with increasing age (RR = 0.50; 95 % CI: 0.48–0.53; for ages 85 + compared to < 65 years) or who had received medicines contraindicated for use with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (RR = 0.66; 95 % CI: 0.64–0.68). During the study period, we estimated that between 28.4 % and 45.4 % of patients aged ≥ 65 years had received molnupiravir in the absence of pharmacological and clinical contraindications to nirmatrelvir/ritonavir.

Conclusion

Many prescriptions were written for molnupiravir where there were no contraindications to nirmatrelvir/ritonavir. The benefits that followed from prompt government action in approving and obtaining nirmatrelvir/ritonavir were therefore likely to be less than they could potentially have been. Governments should consider investing in quality improvement systems to ensure the best outcomes in terms of efficacy and safety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Infectious diseases now
Infectious diseases now Medicine-Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
116
审稿时长
40 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信