颞下颌关节椎间盘缩小和固定术

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
{"title":"颞下颌关节椎间盘缩小和固定术","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jormas.2024.101956","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate the clinical effectiveness and stability of open suture versus micro-screw anchored disc reduction and fixation in treating disc displacement without reduction in the anterior temporomandibular joint.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A total of 38 patients (51 sides) with anterior disc displacement without reduction (ADDwR) of the TMJ treated in our hospital from August 2021 to January 2023 were selected, including 19 cases in group A (23 sides) treated with open temporomandibular joint disc<span> reduction and anchorage, and 19 cases in group B (28 sides) treated with temporomandibular joint disc reduction and suture. The Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) data of the two groups before and after operation were compared to evaluate the effective rate of articular disc<span> reduction, the change of articular disc length, The Maximal Interincisal Opening (MIO) and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) were measured before and after operation.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In group A, the MRI effective rate 6 months after disc reduction was 95.65 % (22/23), the disc length gain was 1.74 mm, MIO was 40.32±5.067 mm, and NRS was 0.47±0.697. The MRI effective rate 6 months after disc reduction in group B was 100 % (28/28). The disc length gain was 1.78 mm, MIO was 41.58±3.746 mm, and NRS was 0.00. There was no significant difference between the two groups (<em>P</em> &gt; 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>TMJ disc reduction and suture and open TMJ disc anchorage can effectively reduce the TMJ disc. The TMJ disc stability is high at 6 months after operation, and the pain and mouth opening can be improved, which is worthy of further promotion in clinical practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55993,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":"125 5","pages":"Article 101956"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of clinical impact of two types of Temporomandibular joint disc reduction and fixation\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jormas.2024.101956\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate the clinical effectiveness and stability of open suture versus micro-screw anchored disc reduction and fixation in treating disc displacement without reduction in the anterior temporomandibular joint.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A total of 38 patients (51 sides) with anterior disc displacement without reduction (ADDwR) of the TMJ treated in our hospital from August 2021 to January 2023 were selected, including 19 cases in group A (23 sides) treated with open temporomandibular joint disc<span> reduction and anchorage, and 19 cases in group B (28 sides) treated with temporomandibular joint disc reduction and suture. The Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) data of the two groups before and after operation were compared to evaluate the effective rate of articular disc<span> reduction, the change of articular disc length, The Maximal Interincisal Opening (MIO) and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) were measured before and after operation.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In group A, the MRI effective rate 6 months after disc reduction was 95.65 % (22/23), the disc length gain was 1.74 mm, MIO was 40.32±5.067 mm, and NRS was 0.47±0.697. The MRI effective rate 6 months after disc reduction in group B was 100 % (28/28). The disc length gain was 1.78 mm, MIO was 41.58±3.746 mm, and NRS was 0.00. There was no significant difference between the two groups (<em>P</em> &gt; 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>TMJ disc reduction and suture and open TMJ disc anchorage can effectively reduce the TMJ disc. The TMJ disc stability is high at 6 months after operation, and the pain and mouth opening can be improved, which is worthy of further promotion in clinical practice.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55993,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"volume\":\"125 5\",\"pages\":\"Article 101956\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468785524002027\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468785524002027","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评价开放缝合与微型螺钉固定椎间盘减容固定术治疗颞下颌关节前方椎间盘移位不缩小的临床疗效及稳定性:选取2021年8月-2023年1月在我院接受治疗的颞下颌关节前椎间盘移位不缩小(ADDwR)患者共38例(51侧),其中A组19例(23侧)采用开放式颞下颌关节椎间盘缩小固定术治疗,B组19例(28侧)采用颞下颌关节椎间盘缩小缝合术治疗。比较两组患者术前和术后的磁共振成像(MRI)数据,评估关节盘缩小的有效率、关节盘长度的变化、最大椎间隙(MIO)以及术前和术后的数字评分量表(NRS):A组椎间盘减薄术后6个月的MRI有效率为95.65%(22/23),椎间盘长度增加1.74mm,最大椎间孔开度(MIO)为40.32±5.067mm,NRS为0.47±0.697。B 组患者椎间盘缩小术后 6 个月的 MRI 有效率为 100%(28/28)。椎间盘长度增加 1.78mm,MIO 为 41.58±3.746mm,NRS 为 0.00。两组间无明显差异(P>0.05):颞下颌关节盘减张缝合术和颞下颌关节盘开放固定术可有效减张颞下颌关节盘。结论:颞下颌关节盘减张缝合术和颞下颌关节盘开放固定术可有效缩小颞下颌关节盘,术后6个月颞下颌关节盘稳定性高,疼痛和张口情况均可改善,值得在临床上进一步推广。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of clinical impact of two types of Temporomandibular joint disc reduction and fixation

Objective

To evaluate the clinical effectiveness and stability of open suture versus micro-screw anchored disc reduction and fixation in treating disc displacement without reduction in the anterior temporomandibular joint.

Methods

A total of 38 patients (51 sides) with anterior disc displacement without reduction (ADDwR) of the TMJ treated in our hospital from August 2021 to January 2023 were selected, including 19 cases in group A (23 sides) treated with open temporomandibular joint disc reduction and anchorage, and 19 cases in group B (28 sides) treated with temporomandibular joint disc reduction and suture. The Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) data of the two groups before and after operation were compared to evaluate the effective rate of articular disc reduction, the change of articular disc length, The Maximal Interincisal Opening (MIO) and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) were measured before and after operation.

Results

In group A, the MRI effective rate 6 months after disc reduction was 95.65 % (22/23), the disc length gain was 1.74 mm, MIO was 40.32±5.067 mm, and NRS was 0.47±0.697. The MRI effective rate 6 months after disc reduction in group B was 100 % (28/28). The disc length gain was 1.78 mm, MIO was 41.58±3.746 mm, and NRS was 0.00. There was no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusions

TMJ disc reduction and suture and open TMJ disc anchorage can effectively reduce the TMJ disc. The TMJ disc stability is high at 6 months after operation, and the pain and mouth opening can be improved, which is worthy of further promotion in clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Surgery, Dentistry, Oral Surgery and Medicine, Otorhinolaryngology and Facial Plastic Surgery
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
23 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信