华盛顿州学校便携式空气净化器的使用情况:基于技术接受模型的定性分析。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Nancy Carmona PhD, Edmund Seto PhD, Lisa Hayward PhD, Shirlee Tan PhD, Sinang Lee MPH, Brandon Kemperman MPH, Jenna Truong BA, Elena Austin ScD
{"title":"华盛顿州学校便携式空气净化器的使用情况:基于技术接受模型的定性分析。","authors":"Nancy Carmona PhD,&nbsp;Edmund Seto PhD,&nbsp;Lisa Hayward PhD,&nbsp;Shirlee Tan PhD,&nbsp;Sinang Lee MPH,&nbsp;Brandon Kemperman MPH,&nbsp;Jenna Truong BA,&nbsp;Elena Austin ScD","doi":"10.1111/josh.13482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> BACKGROUND</h3>\n \n <p>The US government allocated over $2.5 billion in “Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER)” funds to Washington State for COVID-19 response and ventilation improvements. Despite available funding, gaps persist in supporting schools to successfully use portable air cleaners (PACs). We evaluated PAC needs within King County, Washington and characterized factors influencing schools' purchase and use of PACs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> METHODS</h3>\n \n <p>Public Health—Seattle &amp; King County (PHSKC) assessed school's ventilation systems and IAQ improvements through a survey (N = 17). Separately, semi-structured interviews (N = 13) based on the technology acceptance model (TAM) were conducted with school personnel. A thematic analysis using inductive and deductive coding was conducted and logistic regression models assessed the predictive capability of the TAM.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> RESULTS</h3>\n \n <p>The PHSKC survey findings informed our recommendations. Positive attitudes, knowledge, and beliefs in ease of use and effectiveness of PACs were facilitators to PAC use. While barriers included a lack of training, education, and concerns about PAC maintenance and sustainability. TAM constructs of perceived usefulness (PU) and perceived ease of use (PEU) were predictive of having the intention to use PACs in schools.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> CONCLUSIONS</h3>\n \n <p>There is a critical need for solutions to circumvent challenges to implementing PACs in schools. This characterization provides insight for promoting PAC use in IAQ-impacted schools.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50059,"journal":{"name":"Journal of School Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of Portable Air Cleaners in Washington State Schools: A Qualitative Analysis Based on the Technology Acceptance Model\",\"authors\":\"Nancy Carmona PhD,&nbsp;Edmund Seto PhD,&nbsp;Lisa Hayward PhD,&nbsp;Shirlee Tan PhD,&nbsp;Sinang Lee MPH,&nbsp;Brandon Kemperman MPH,&nbsp;Jenna Truong BA,&nbsp;Elena Austin ScD\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/josh.13482\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> BACKGROUND</h3>\\n \\n <p>The US government allocated over $2.5 billion in “Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER)” funds to Washington State for COVID-19 response and ventilation improvements. Despite available funding, gaps persist in supporting schools to successfully use portable air cleaners (PACs). We evaluated PAC needs within King County, Washington and characterized factors influencing schools' purchase and use of PACs.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> METHODS</h3>\\n \\n <p>Public Health—Seattle &amp; King County (PHSKC) assessed school's ventilation systems and IAQ improvements through a survey (N = 17). Separately, semi-structured interviews (N = 13) based on the technology acceptance model (TAM) were conducted with school personnel. A thematic analysis using inductive and deductive coding was conducted and logistic regression models assessed the predictive capability of the TAM.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> RESULTS</h3>\\n \\n <p>The PHSKC survey findings informed our recommendations. Positive attitudes, knowledge, and beliefs in ease of use and effectiveness of PACs were facilitators to PAC use. While barriers included a lack of training, education, and concerns about PAC maintenance and sustainability. TAM constructs of perceived usefulness (PU) and perceived ease of use (PEU) were predictive of having the intention to use PACs in schools.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> CONCLUSIONS</h3>\\n \\n <p>There is a critical need for solutions to circumvent challenges to implementing PACs in schools. This characterization provides insight for promoting PAC use in IAQ-impacted schools.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50059,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of School Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of School Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/josh.13482\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of School Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/josh.13482","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:美国政府向华盛顿州划拨了超过 25 亿美元的 "中小学紧急救援(ESSER)"资金,用于 COVID-19 的应对和通风设备的改善。尽管资金到位,但在支持学校成功使用便携式空气净化器 (PAC) 方面仍存在差距。我们对华盛顿州金县的便携式空气净化器需求进行了评估,并分析了影响学校购买和使用便携式空气净化器的因素:方法:西雅图和金县公共卫生局(PHSKC)通过调查(17 人)评估了学校的通风系统和室内空气质量改善情况。另外,还根据技术接受模型(TAM)对学校工作人员进行了半结构式访谈(13 人)。采用归纳和演绎编码法进行了主题分析,并通过逻辑回归模型评估了 TAM 的预测能力:PHSKC 的调查结果为我们的建议提供了依据。积极的态度、知识以及对 PAC 易用性和有效性的信念是使用 PAC 的促进因素。而障碍则包括缺乏培训和教育,以及对 PAC 维护和可持续性的担忧。感知有用性(PU)和感知易用性(PEU)这两个 TAM 构建预测了学校使用 PAC 的意愿:结论:在学校实施 PAC 所面临的挑战急需解决方法。这一特征描述为在受室内空气质量影响的学校推广使用空调提供了启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Use of Portable Air Cleaners in Washington State Schools: A Qualitative Analysis Based on the Technology Acceptance Model

BACKGROUND

The US government allocated over $2.5 billion in “Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER)” funds to Washington State for COVID-19 response and ventilation improvements. Despite available funding, gaps persist in supporting schools to successfully use portable air cleaners (PACs). We evaluated PAC needs within King County, Washington and characterized factors influencing schools' purchase and use of PACs.

METHODS

Public Health—Seattle & King County (PHSKC) assessed school's ventilation systems and IAQ improvements through a survey (N = 17). Separately, semi-structured interviews (N = 13) based on the technology acceptance model (TAM) were conducted with school personnel. A thematic analysis using inductive and deductive coding was conducted and logistic regression models assessed the predictive capability of the TAM.

RESULTS

The PHSKC survey findings informed our recommendations. Positive attitudes, knowledge, and beliefs in ease of use and effectiveness of PACs were facilitators to PAC use. While barriers included a lack of training, education, and concerns about PAC maintenance and sustainability. TAM constructs of perceived usefulness (PU) and perceived ease of use (PEU) were predictive of having the intention to use PACs in schools.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a critical need for solutions to circumvent challenges to implementing PACs in schools. This characterization provides insight for promoting PAC use in IAQ-impacted schools.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of School Health
Journal of School Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
134
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of School Health is published 12 times a year on behalf of the American School Health Association. It addresses practice, theory, and research related to the health and well-being of school-aged youth. The journal is a top-tiered resource for professionals who work toward providing students with the programs, services, and environment they need for good health and academic success.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信