使用 "明显差异法 "提高男性跑步者的感知敏锐度。

IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Perceptual and Motor Skills Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-18 DOI:10.1177/00315125241252852
Maressa Priscila Krause, Luke Haile, Dayanne Sampaio Antonio, Andre L Peres, Robert J Robertson
{"title":"使用 \"明显差异法 \"提高男性跑步者的感知敏锐度。","authors":"Maressa Priscila Krause, Luke Haile, Dayanne Sampaio Antonio, Andre L Peres, Robert J Robertson","doi":"10.1177/00315125241252852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We were interested in micro-variations in an athlete's psychophysical state that separate peak exertion from physiological collapse. Thus, we measured perceptual acuity in runners using a classic psychophysical approach, the <i>just noticeable difference</i> (JND) on two standard stimuli runs at treadmill speed corresponding to 70%VO<sub>2max</sub> and 80%VO<sub>2max</sub>. Thirty-four male runners (<i>M</i> age = 35.26, <i>SD</i> = 7.33 years) first performed a maximal treadmill test to determine the speed of a standard exercise bout for the JND trials. The JND trials consisted of four 5-minute running bouts on a treadmill with 5-minute rests between bouts. For bouts 1 and 3, participants ran at the standard stimuli pace, but for bouts 2 and 4, they adjusted their speeds to achieve a level of exertion at a JND above/below the SS. They achieved differences in the final 30 seconds of the VO<sub>2</sub> between each JND bout and the previous standard stimuli at just above (JND-A) and just below (JND-B) the JND perceived exertions. We used a Generalized Linear Model analysis to compare the JND-A and JND-B within and between ventilatory threshold groups (lower/higher) in absolute and relative VO<sub>2</sub> and in terms of the total JND magnitude. The magnitude of JND-A was greater than that of JND-B at 70%VO<sub>2max</sub> and 80%VO<sub>2max</sub> in absolute units (70%VO<sub>2</sub> Δ = 2.62; <i>SE</i> = 0.37; <i>p</i> < .001; 80%VO<sub>2</sub> Δ = 1.67; <i>SE</i> = 0.44; <i>p</i> = .002) and in relative units (70%VO<sub>2max</sub> Δ = 4.70; <i>SE</i> = 0.66; <i>p</i> < .001; 80%VO<sub>2max</sub> Δ = 2.96; <i>SE</i> = 0.80; <i>p</i> = .002). The total magnitude was greater in the 70%VO<sub>2max</sub> trial than 80%VO<sub>2max</sub> in absolute units (70%VO<sub>2</sub> <i>M</i> = 3.78, <i>SE</i> = 0.31 mL·kg<sup>-1</sup>·min<sup>-1</sup>; 80%VO<sub>2</sub> <i>M =</i> 2.62, <i>SE</i> = 0.37 mL·kg<sup>-1</sup>·min<sup>-1</sup>; <i>p =</i> .020) and in relative units (70%VO<sub>2max</sub> <i>M =</i> 6.57, <i>SE</i> = 0.53%VO<sub>2max</sub>; 80%VO<sub>2max</sub> <i>M =</i> 4.71, <i>SE</i> = 0.64%VO<sub>2max</sub>; <i>p =</i> .030). The JND range narrowed when physiologic demand increased, for both physical (speed) and psychological (RPE) variables.</p>","PeriodicalId":19869,"journal":{"name":"Perceptual and Motor Skills","volume":" ","pages":"1341-1359"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Use of a <i>Just Noticeable Difference</i> Approach to Improve Perceptual Acuity Ability in Male Runners.\",\"authors\":\"Maressa Priscila Krause, Luke Haile, Dayanne Sampaio Antonio, Andre L Peres, Robert J Robertson\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00315125241252852\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We were interested in micro-variations in an athlete's psychophysical state that separate peak exertion from physiological collapse. Thus, we measured perceptual acuity in runners using a classic psychophysical approach, the <i>just noticeable difference</i> (JND) on two standard stimuli runs at treadmill speed corresponding to 70%VO<sub>2max</sub> and 80%VO<sub>2max</sub>. Thirty-four male runners (<i>M</i> age = 35.26, <i>SD</i> = 7.33 years) first performed a maximal treadmill test to determine the speed of a standard exercise bout for the JND trials. The JND trials consisted of four 5-minute running bouts on a treadmill with 5-minute rests between bouts. For bouts 1 and 3, participants ran at the standard stimuli pace, but for bouts 2 and 4, they adjusted their speeds to achieve a level of exertion at a JND above/below the SS. They achieved differences in the final 30 seconds of the VO<sub>2</sub> between each JND bout and the previous standard stimuli at just above (JND-A) and just below (JND-B) the JND perceived exertions. We used a Generalized Linear Model analysis to compare the JND-A and JND-B within and between ventilatory threshold groups (lower/higher) in absolute and relative VO<sub>2</sub> and in terms of the total JND magnitude. The magnitude of JND-A was greater than that of JND-B at 70%VO<sub>2max</sub> and 80%VO<sub>2max</sub> in absolute units (70%VO<sub>2</sub> Δ = 2.62; <i>SE</i> = 0.37; <i>p</i> < .001; 80%VO<sub>2</sub> Δ = 1.67; <i>SE</i> = 0.44; <i>p</i> = .002) and in relative units (70%VO<sub>2max</sub> Δ = 4.70; <i>SE</i> = 0.66; <i>p</i> < .001; 80%VO<sub>2max</sub> Δ = 2.96; <i>SE</i> = 0.80; <i>p</i> = .002). The total magnitude was greater in the 70%VO<sub>2max</sub> trial than 80%VO<sub>2max</sub> in absolute units (70%VO<sub>2</sub> <i>M</i> = 3.78, <i>SE</i> = 0.31 mL·kg<sup>-1</sup>·min<sup>-1</sup>; 80%VO<sub>2</sub> <i>M =</i> 2.62, <i>SE</i> = 0.37 mL·kg<sup>-1</sup>·min<sup>-1</sup>; <i>p =</i> .020) and in relative units (70%VO<sub>2max</sub> <i>M =</i> 6.57, <i>SE</i> = 0.53%VO<sub>2max</sub>; 80%VO<sub>2max</sub> <i>M =</i> 4.71, <i>SE</i> = 0.64%VO<sub>2max</sub>; <i>p =</i> .030). The JND range narrowed when physiologic demand increased, for both physical (speed) and psychological (RPE) variables.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19869,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perceptual and Motor Skills\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1341-1359\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perceptual and Motor Skills\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00315125241252852\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perceptual and Motor Skills","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00315125241252852","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们对运动员心理物理状态的微观变化很感兴趣,这种微观变化是峰值消耗和生理崩溃之间的分水岭。因此,我们使用一种经典的心理物理方法测量了跑步者的知觉敏锐度,即在跑步机上以 70%VO2max 和 80%VO2max 的速度进行两次标准刺激跑时的刚注意到的差异 (JND)。34 名男性跑步者(平均年龄 35.26 岁,平均年龄 7.33 岁)首先进行了最大跑步机测试,以确定 JND 试验的标准运动速度。JND 试验包括在跑步机上进行四次 5 分钟的跑步,每次跑步之间休息 5 分钟。在第 1 次和第 3 次试验中,参与者以标准刺激速度跑步,但在第 2 次和第 4 次试验中,他们调整了速度,以达到高于/低于 SS 的 JND 运动强度。他们在最后 30 秒的 VO2 值上实现了每场 JND 与前一场标准刺激之间的差异,即略高于(JND-A)和略低于(JND-B)JND 感知消耗量。我们使用广义线性模型分析法比较了通气阈值组(较低/较高)内和组间的 JND-A 和 JND-B 的绝对和相对 VO2 以及总 JND 幅值。在绝对单位(70%VO2 Δ = 2.62;SE = 0.37;p < .001;80%VO2 Δ = 1.67;SE = 0.44;p = .002)和相对单位(70%VO2max Δ = 4.70;SE = 0.66;p < .001;80%VO2max Δ = 2.96;SE = 0.80;p = .002)上,70%VO2max 和 80%VO2max 时的 JND-A 幅值大于 JND-B 幅值。就绝对单位(70%VO2 M = 3.78,SE = 0.31 mL-kg-1-min-1;80%VO2 M = 2.62,SE = 0.37 mL-kg-1-min-1;p = .020)和相对单位(70%VO2max M = 6.57,SE = 0.53%VO2max;80%VO2max M = 4.71,SE = 0.64%VO2max;p = .030)而言,70%VO2max 试验的总幅度大于 80%VO2max。当生理需求增加时,JND 范围缩小,生理(速度)和心理(RPE)变量均是如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Use of a Just Noticeable Difference Approach to Improve Perceptual Acuity Ability in Male Runners.

We were interested in micro-variations in an athlete's psychophysical state that separate peak exertion from physiological collapse. Thus, we measured perceptual acuity in runners using a classic psychophysical approach, the just noticeable difference (JND) on two standard stimuli runs at treadmill speed corresponding to 70%VO2max and 80%VO2max. Thirty-four male runners (M age = 35.26, SD = 7.33 years) first performed a maximal treadmill test to determine the speed of a standard exercise bout for the JND trials. The JND trials consisted of four 5-minute running bouts on a treadmill with 5-minute rests between bouts. For bouts 1 and 3, participants ran at the standard stimuli pace, but for bouts 2 and 4, they adjusted their speeds to achieve a level of exertion at a JND above/below the SS. They achieved differences in the final 30 seconds of the VO2 between each JND bout and the previous standard stimuli at just above (JND-A) and just below (JND-B) the JND perceived exertions. We used a Generalized Linear Model analysis to compare the JND-A and JND-B within and between ventilatory threshold groups (lower/higher) in absolute and relative VO2 and in terms of the total JND magnitude. The magnitude of JND-A was greater than that of JND-B at 70%VO2max and 80%VO2max in absolute units (70%VO2 Δ = 2.62; SE = 0.37; p < .001; 80%VO2 Δ = 1.67; SE = 0.44; p = .002) and in relative units (70%VO2max Δ = 4.70; SE = 0.66; p < .001; 80%VO2max Δ = 2.96; SE = 0.80; p = .002). The total magnitude was greater in the 70%VO2max trial than 80%VO2max in absolute units (70%VO2 M = 3.78, SE = 0.31 mL·kg-1·min-1; 80%VO2 M = 2.62, SE = 0.37 mL·kg-1·min-1; p = .020) and in relative units (70%VO2max M = 6.57, SE = 0.53%VO2max; 80%VO2max M = 4.71, SE = 0.64%VO2max; p = .030). The JND range narrowed when physiologic demand increased, for both physical (speed) and psychological (RPE) variables.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Perceptual and Motor Skills
Perceptual and Motor Skills PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
110
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信