Masha Burelo , Jack Bray , Olga Gulka , Michael Firbank , John-Paul Taylor , Bettina Platt
{"title":"先进的 qEEG 分析可区分痴呆症亚型","authors":"Masha Burelo , Jack Bray , Olga Gulka , Michael Firbank , John-Paul Taylor , Bettina Platt","doi":"10.1016/j.jneumeth.2024.110195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Dementia is caused by neurodegenerative conditions and characterized by cognitive decline. Diagnostic accuracy for dementia subtypes, such as Alzheimer’s Disease (AD), Dementia with Lewy Bodies (DLB) and Parkinson’s Disease with dementia (PDD), remains challenging.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Here, different methods of quantitative electroencephalography (qEEG) analyses were employed to assess their effectiveness in distinguishing dementia subtypes from healthy controls under eyes closed (EC) and eyes open (EO) conditions.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Classic Fast-Fourier Transform (FFT) and autoregressive (AR) power analyses differentiated between all conditions for the 4–8 Hz theta range. Only individuals with dementia with Lewy Bodies (DLB) differed from healthy subjects for the wider 4–15 Hz frequency range, encompassing the actual dominant frequency of all individuals. FFT results for this range yielded wider significant discriminators vs AR, also detecting differences between AD and DLB. Analyses of the inclusive dominant / peak frequency range (4–15 Hz) indicated slowing and reduced variability, also discriminating between synucleinopathies vs controls and AD. Dissociation of periodic oscillations and aperiodic components of AR spectra using Fitting-Oscillations-&-One-Over-F (FOOOF) modelling delivered a reliable and subtype-specific slowing of brain oscillatory peaks during EC and EO for all groups. Distinct and robust differences were particularly strong for aperiodic parameters, suggesting their potential diagnostic power in detecting specific changes resulting from age and cognitive status.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our findings indicate that qEEG methods can reliably detect dementia subtypes. Spectral analyses comprising an integrated, multi-parameter EEG approach discriminating between periodic and aperiodic components under EC and EO conditions may enhance diagnostic accuracy in the future.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16415,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroscience Methods","volume":"409 ","pages":"Article 110195"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advanced qEEG analyses discriminate between dementia subtypes\",\"authors\":\"Masha Burelo , Jack Bray , Olga Gulka , Michael Firbank , John-Paul Taylor , Bettina Platt\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jneumeth.2024.110195\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Dementia is caused by neurodegenerative conditions and characterized by cognitive decline. Diagnostic accuracy for dementia subtypes, such as Alzheimer’s Disease (AD), Dementia with Lewy Bodies (DLB) and Parkinson’s Disease with dementia (PDD), remains challenging.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Here, different methods of quantitative electroencephalography (qEEG) analyses were employed to assess their effectiveness in distinguishing dementia subtypes from healthy controls under eyes closed (EC) and eyes open (EO) conditions.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Classic Fast-Fourier Transform (FFT) and autoregressive (AR) power analyses differentiated between all conditions for the 4–8 Hz theta range. Only individuals with dementia with Lewy Bodies (DLB) differed from healthy subjects for the wider 4–15 Hz frequency range, encompassing the actual dominant frequency of all individuals. FFT results for this range yielded wider significant discriminators vs AR, also detecting differences between AD and DLB. Analyses of the inclusive dominant / peak frequency range (4–15 Hz) indicated slowing and reduced variability, also discriminating between synucleinopathies vs controls and AD. Dissociation of periodic oscillations and aperiodic components of AR spectra using Fitting-Oscillations-&-One-Over-F (FOOOF) modelling delivered a reliable and subtype-specific slowing of brain oscillatory peaks during EC and EO for all groups. Distinct and robust differences were particularly strong for aperiodic parameters, suggesting their potential diagnostic power in detecting specific changes resulting from age and cognitive status.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our findings indicate that qEEG methods can reliably detect dementia subtypes. Spectral analyses comprising an integrated, multi-parameter EEG approach discriminating between periodic and aperiodic components under EC and EO conditions may enhance diagnostic accuracy in the future.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16415,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neuroscience Methods\",\"volume\":\"409 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110195\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neuroscience Methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165027024001407\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroscience Methods","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165027024001407","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Advanced qEEG analyses discriminate between dementia subtypes
Background
Dementia is caused by neurodegenerative conditions and characterized by cognitive decline. Diagnostic accuracy for dementia subtypes, such as Alzheimer’s Disease (AD), Dementia with Lewy Bodies (DLB) and Parkinson’s Disease with dementia (PDD), remains challenging.
Methods
Here, different methods of quantitative electroencephalography (qEEG) analyses were employed to assess their effectiveness in distinguishing dementia subtypes from healthy controls under eyes closed (EC) and eyes open (EO) conditions.
Results
Classic Fast-Fourier Transform (FFT) and autoregressive (AR) power analyses differentiated between all conditions for the 4–8 Hz theta range. Only individuals with dementia with Lewy Bodies (DLB) differed from healthy subjects for the wider 4–15 Hz frequency range, encompassing the actual dominant frequency of all individuals. FFT results for this range yielded wider significant discriminators vs AR, also detecting differences between AD and DLB. Analyses of the inclusive dominant / peak frequency range (4–15 Hz) indicated slowing and reduced variability, also discriminating between synucleinopathies vs controls and AD. Dissociation of periodic oscillations and aperiodic components of AR spectra using Fitting-Oscillations-&-One-Over-F (FOOOF) modelling delivered a reliable and subtype-specific slowing of brain oscillatory peaks during EC and EO for all groups. Distinct and robust differences were particularly strong for aperiodic parameters, suggesting their potential diagnostic power in detecting specific changes resulting from age and cognitive status.
Conclusion
Our findings indicate that qEEG methods can reliably detect dementia subtypes. Spectral analyses comprising an integrated, multi-parameter EEG approach discriminating between periodic and aperiodic components under EC and EO conditions may enhance diagnostic accuracy in the future.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Neuroscience Methods publishes papers that describe new methods that are specifically for neuroscience research conducted in invertebrates, vertebrates or in man. Major methodological improvements or important refinements of established neuroscience methods are also considered for publication. The Journal''s Scope includes all aspects of contemporary neuroscience research, including anatomical, behavioural, biochemical, cellular, computational, molecular, invasive and non-invasive imaging, optogenetic, and physiological research investigations.