Gyula Kasza , Tekla Izsó , Solveig Langsrud , Domagoj Vrbos , Nina Veflen , Øydis Ueland , Joachim Scholderer , Lars Münter , Eszter Csenki , Dávid Szakos , James Ramsay , Miklós Süth
{"title":"机构食品安全风险交流--自我评估工具及其释义","authors":"Gyula Kasza , Tekla Izsó , Solveig Langsrud , Domagoj Vrbos , Nina Veflen , Øydis Ueland , Joachim Scholderer , Lars Münter , Eszter Csenki , Dávid Szakos , James Ramsay , Miklós Süth","doi":"10.1016/j.tifs.2024.104594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Food safety risk communication is part of the risk analysis methodology and plays an important role in the increasingly complex food system. Besides shaping consumer risk awareness, risk perception and risk behaviour, risk communication also affects the reputation of the food safety authorities, being especially important for securing operational stability and budget of the concerned organisations. A recent European study highlighted a high variance in risk communication preparedness of official institutions in EU member countries.</p></div><div><h3>Scope and approach</h3><p>This paper presents a benchmarking instrument, the Self-evaluation Tool for Risk Communication (SET), designed for food safety authorities. SET helps decision-makers to receive a quick assessment of their preparedness level for risk communication by comparing it with international best practices.</p></div><div><h3>Key findings and conclusions</h3><p>SET divides risk communication competencies into three domains: Human capacities, Organisational management, and Risk communication activities. Several elements are assessed in each domain, evaluated on a scale from 0 to 3. The results are delivered instantly, benchmarking the scores in terms of domains and the individual elements. The data wheel visualization highlights strengths and weaknesses and points out logical improvement options for the organisation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":441,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Food Science & Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":15.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092422442400270X/pdfft?md5=4a299b8405306db3a5459668a1ad63db&pid=1-s2.0-S092422442400270X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Institutional food safety risk communication – A self-evaluation tool and its interpretation\",\"authors\":\"Gyula Kasza , Tekla Izsó , Solveig Langsrud , Domagoj Vrbos , Nina Veflen , Øydis Ueland , Joachim Scholderer , Lars Münter , Eszter Csenki , Dávid Szakos , James Ramsay , Miklós Süth\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tifs.2024.104594\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Food safety risk communication is part of the risk analysis methodology and plays an important role in the increasingly complex food system. Besides shaping consumer risk awareness, risk perception and risk behaviour, risk communication also affects the reputation of the food safety authorities, being especially important for securing operational stability and budget of the concerned organisations. A recent European study highlighted a high variance in risk communication preparedness of official institutions in EU member countries.</p></div><div><h3>Scope and approach</h3><p>This paper presents a benchmarking instrument, the Self-evaluation Tool for Risk Communication (SET), designed for food safety authorities. SET helps decision-makers to receive a quick assessment of their preparedness level for risk communication by comparing it with international best practices.</p></div><div><h3>Key findings and conclusions</h3><p>SET divides risk communication competencies into three domains: Human capacities, Organisational management, and Risk communication activities. Several elements are assessed in each domain, evaluated on a scale from 0 to 3. The results are delivered instantly, benchmarking the scores in terms of domains and the individual elements. The data wheel visualization highlights strengths and weaknesses and points out logical improvement options for the organisation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":441,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trends in Food Science & Technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":15.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092422442400270X/pdfft?md5=4a299b8405306db3a5459668a1ad63db&pid=1-s2.0-S092422442400270X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trends in Food Science & Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092422442400270X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Food Science & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092422442400270X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Institutional food safety risk communication – A self-evaluation tool and its interpretation
Background
Food safety risk communication is part of the risk analysis methodology and plays an important role in the increasingly complex food system. Besides shaping consumer risk awareness, risk perception and risk behaviour, risk communication also affects the reputation of the food safety authorities, being especially important for securing operational stability and budget of the concerned organisations. A recent European study highlighted a high variance in risk communication preparedness of official institutions in EU member countries.
Scope and approach
This paper presents a benchmarking instrument, the Self-evaluation Tool for Risk Communication (SET), designed for food safety authorities. SET helps decision-makers to receive a quick assessment of their preparedness level for risk communication by comparing it with international best practices.
Key findings and conclusions
SET divides risk communication competencies into three domains: Human capacities, Organisational management, and Risk communication activities. Several elements are assessed in each domain, evaluated on a scale from 0 to 3. The results are delivered instantly, benchmarking the scores in terms of domains and the individual elements. The data wheel visualization highlights strengths and weaknesses and points out logical improvement options for the organisation.
期刊介绍:
Trends in Food Science & Technology is a prestigious international journal that specializes in peer-reviewed articles covering the latest advancements in technology, food science, and human nutrition. It serves as a bridge between specialized primary journals and general trade magazines, providing readable and scientifically rigorous reviews and commentaries on current research developments and their potential applications in the food industry.
Unlike traditional journals, Trends in Food Science & Technology does not publish original research papers. Instead, it focuses on critical and comprehensive reviews to offer valuable insights for professionals in the field. By bringing together cutting-edge research and industry applications, this journal plays a vital role in disseminating knowledge and facilitating advancements in the food science and technology sector.