提高在线育儿研究的数据质量

IF 2.8 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Makena L. Kaylor-Tapscott, Maddison N. Tolliver-Lynn, Maureen A. Sullivan
{"title":"提高在线育儿研究的数据质量","authors":"Makena L. Kaylor-Tapscott,&nbsp;Maddison N. Tolliver-Lynn,&nbsp;Maureen A. Sullivan","doi":"10.1002/icd.2525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>Online surveys provide many benefits for researchers but are vulnerable to fraudulent responders that threaten data quality. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of current detection strategies after noting patterns in our data. We systematically reviewed responses (<i>N</i> = 180) from parenting studies utilizing two online platforms. Respondents were categorized as accepted (<i>n</i> = 45) or fraudulent (<i>n</i> = 135), and responses on standardized measures were examined to determine if fraudulent scores differed. Accepted participants were predominately female (98.4%) and White (67.9%). Average caregiver age was 40.61 (SD = 7.37) on Qualtrics and 59.88 (SD = 6.01) on REDCap. The majority of fraudulent responders reported being female (62.1%) and White (80.6%), with average caregiver ages of 37.83 (SD = 7.35) for Qualtrics and 56.16 (SD = 8.86) for REDCap. Fraudulent responders had significantly higher median scores on measures of caregiver distress (<i>r</i><sub>DASS</sub> = 0.21) and child behavioural problems (<i>r</i><sub>CBCL</sub> = 0.33). Previously recommended strategies were insufficient at preventing and identifying fraudulent responders. Recommendations for improving these strategies are discussed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Highlights</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>The current paper includes experiences using multiple strategies to detect fraudulent responders in two online parenting studies.</li>\n \n <li>Improvements to previously recommended strategies and an example review form are included to aid researchers in detecting fraudulent responders.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47820,"journal":{"name":"Infant and Child Development","volume":"33 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving data quality in online parenting research\",\"authors\":\"Makena L. Kaylor-Tapscott,&nbsp;Maddison N. Tolliver-Lynn,&nbsp;Maureen A. Sullivan\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/icd.2525\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <p>Online surveys provide many benefits for researchers but are vulnerable to fraudulent responders that threaten data quality. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of current detection strategies after noting patterns in our data. We systematically reviewed responses (<i>N</i> = 180) from parenting studies utilizing two online platforms. Respondents were categorized as accepted (<i>n</i> = 45) or fraudulent (<i>n</i> = 135), and responses on standardized measures were examined to determine if fraudulent scores differed. Accepted participants were predominately female (98.4%) and White (67.9%). Average caregiver age was 40.61 (SD = 7.37) on Qualtrics and 59.88 (SD = 6.01) on REDCap. The majority of fraudulent responders reported being female (62.1%) and White (80.6%), with average caregiver ages of 37.83 (SD = 7.35) for Qualtrics and 56.16 (SD = 8.86) for REDCap. Fraudulent responders had significantly higher median scores on measures of caregiver distress (<i>r</i><sub>DASS</sub> = 0.21) and child behavioural problems (<i>r</i><sub>CBCL</sub> = 0.33). Previously recommended strategies were insufficient at preventing and identifying fraudulent responders. Recommendations for improving these strategies are discussed.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Highlights</h3>\\n \\n <div>\\n <ul>\\n \\n <li>The current paper includes experiences using multiple strategies to detect fraudulent responders in two online parenting studies.</li>\\n \\n <li>Improvements to previously recommended strategies and an example review form are included to aid researchers in detecting fraudulent responders.</li>\\n </ul>\\n </div>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47820,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infant and Child Development\",\"volume\":\"33 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infant and Child Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/icd.2525\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infant and Child Development","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/icd.2525","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在线调查为研究人员带来了很多好处,但也容易受到欺诈性应答者的影响,从而威胁到数据质量。在注意到数据中的模式后,我们旨在评估当前检测策略的有效性。我们利用两个在线平台系统地审查了育儿研究中的回复(N = 180)。受访者被分为接受受访者(n = 45)或欺诈受访者(n = 135),并对标准化测量的回复进行检查,以确定欺诈受访者的得分是否存在差异。被接受的参与者主要为女性(98.4%)和白人(67.9%)。在 Qualtrics 上,护理人员的平均年龄为 40.61 岁(SD = 7.37),在 REDCap 上,平均年龄为 59.88 岁(SD = 6.01)。大多数欺诈性应答者称自己是女性(62.1%)和白人(80.6%),Qualtrics 和 REDCap 的护理人员平均年龄分别为 37.83 岁(SD = 7.35)和 56.16 岁(SD = 8.86)。欺诈性应答者在照顾者痛苦(rDASS = 0.21)和儿童行为问题(rCBCL = 0.33)测量中的中位数得分明显更高。以前推荐的策略不足以预防和识别欺诈性应答者。本文介绍了在两项在线育儿研究中使用多种策略检测欺诈性应答者的经验,包括对以前推荐策略的改进和审查表范例,以帮助研究人员检测欺诈性应答者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improving data quality in online parenting research

Online surveys provide many benefits for researchers but are vulnerable to fraudulent responders that threaten data quality. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of current detection strategies after noting patterns in our data. We systematically reviewed responses (N = 180) from parenting studies utilizing two online platforms. Respondents were categorized as accepted (n = 45) or fraudulent (n = 135), and responses on standardized measures were examined to determine if fraudulent scores differed. Accepted participants were predominately female (98.4%) and White (67.9%). Average caregiver age was 40.61 (SD = 7.37) on Qualtrics and 59.88 (SD = 6.01) on REDCap. The majority of fraudulent responders reported being female (62.1%) and White (80.6%), with average caregiver ages of 37.83 (SD = 7.35) for Qualtrics and 56.16 (SD = 8.86) for REDCap. Fraudulent responders had significantly higher median scores on measures of caregiver distress (rDASS = 0.21) and child behavioural problems (rCBCL = 0.33). Previously recommended strategies were insufficient at preventing and identifying fraudulent responders. Recommendations for improving these strategies are discussed.

Highlights

  • The current paper includes experiences using multiple strategies to detect fraudulent responders in two online parenting studies.
  • Improvements to previously recommended strategies and an example review form are included to aid researchers in detecting fraudulent responders.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Infant and Child Development
Infant and Child Development PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
93
期刊介绍: Infant and Child Development publishes high quality empirical, theoretical and methodological papers addressing psychological development from the antenatal period through to adolescence. The journal brings together research on: - social and emotional development - perceptual and motor development - cognitive development - language development atypical development (including conduct problems, anxiety and depressive conditions, language impairments, autistic spectrum disorders, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorders)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信