从跨学科角度看国际阅读障碍协会对阅读障碍定义的优缺点。

IF 2.1 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Brian Gearin, Jessica Turtura, Kim Anderson, Samantha Durrance, Joan Mele-McCarthy, Laura Schultz, Karleen Spitulnik
{"title":"从跨学科角度看国际阅读障碍协会对阅读障碍定义的优缺点。","authors":"Brian Gearin,&nbsp;Jessica Turtura,&nbsp;Kim Anderson,&nbsp;Samantha Durrance,&nbsp;Joan Mele-McCarthy,&nbsp;Laura Schultz,&nbsp;Karleen Spitulnik","doi":"10.1007/s11881-024-00310-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This commentary article describes the results of a Delphi Method discussion between an interdisciplinary team of state dyslexia policy implementers. The authors argue that the International Dyslexia Association (IDA) definition of dyslexia from 2001 skews toward the perspectives of the research community, inadvertently creating implementation challenges for school practice. The article describes how the authors reached this determination; why they believe Vaughn et al.’s (Annals of Dyslexia, 2024) proposed definition marks an improvement over the 2001 IDA definition; and the need for continued support in the dyslexia policy implementation process, including knowledge dissemination efforts and updates to other relevant policy documents. This collaboration between policymakers, educators, and researchers contributes to the special issue by considering how the definition of dyslexia is situated in policy and practice. In so doing, it addresses a longstanding gap in academic research on how policy implementers understand and use the IDA definition.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47273,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Dyslexia","volume":"74 3","pages":"337 - 354"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An interdisciplinary perspective on the strengths and weaknesses of the International Dyslexia Association definition of dyslexia\",\"authors\":\"Brian Gearin,&nbsp;Jessica Turtura,&nbsp;Kim Anderson,&nbsp;Samantha Durrance,&nbsp;Joan Mele-McCarthy,&nbsp;Laura Schultz,&nbsp;Karleen Spitulnik\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11881-024-00310-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This commentary article describes the results of a Delphi Method discussion between an interdisciplinary team of state dyslexia policy implementers. The authors argue that the International Dyslexia Association (IDA) definition of dyslexia from 2001 skews toward the perspectives of the research community, inadvertently creating implementation challenges for school practice. The article describes how the authors reached this determination; why they believe Vaughn et al.’s (Annals of Dyslexia, 2024) proposed definition marks an improvement over the 2001 IDA definition; and the need for continued support in the dyslexia policy implementation process, including knowledge dissemination efforts and updates to other relevant policy documents. This collaboration between policymakers, educators, and researchers contributes to the special issue by considering how the definition of dyslexia is situated in policy and practice. In so doing, it addresses a longstanding gap in academic research on how policy implementers understand and use the IDA definition.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Dyslexia\",\"volume\":\"74 3\",\"pages\":\"337 - 354\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Dyslexia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11881-024-00310-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Dyslexia","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11881-024-00310-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇评论文章介绍了一个由各州阅读障碍政策执行者组成的跨学科团队通过德尔菲法(Delphi Method)进行讨论的结果。作者认为,2001 年国际阅读障碍协会 (IDA) 对阅读障碍的定义偏向于研究界的观点,无意中给学校的实践带来了实施上的挑战。文章介绍了作者是如何得出这一结论的;为什么他们认为 Vaughn 等人(《阅读障碍年鉴》,2024 年)提出的定义比 2001 年国际阅读障碍协会的定义有所改进;以及在阅读障碍政策实施过程中需要持续的支持,包括知识传播工作和其他相关政策文件的更新。政策制定者、教育工作者和研究人员之间的合作,通过考虑阅读障碍的定义在政策和实践中的定位,为本期特刊做出了贡献。在此过程中,它解决了学术研究中长期存在的一个空白,即政策执行者如何理解和使用国际阅读障碍协会的定义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An interdisciplinary perspective on the strengths and weaknesses of the International Dyslexia Association definition of dyslexia

This commentary article describes the results of a Delphi Method discussion between an interdisciplinary team of state dyslexia policy implementers. The authors argue that the International Dyslexia Association (IDA) definition of dyslexia from 2001 skews toward the perspectives of the research community, inadvertently creating implementation challenges for school practice. The article describes how the authors reached this determination; why they believe Vaughn et al.’s (Annals of Dyslexia, 2024) proposed definition marks an improvement over the 2001 IDA definition; and the need for continued support in the dyslexia policy implementation process, including knowledge dissemination efforts and updates to other relevant policy documents. This collaboration between policymakers, educators, and researchers contributes to the special issue by considering how the definition of dyslexia is situated in policy and practice. In so doing, it addresses a longstanding gap in academic research on how policy implementers understand and use the IDA definition.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Dyslexia
Annals of Dyslexia Multiple-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.70%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Annals of Dyslexia is an interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the scientific study of dyslexia, its comorbid conditions; and theory-based practices on remediation, and intervention of dyslexia and related areas of written language disorders including spelling, composing and mathematics. Primary consideration for publication is given to original empirical studies, significant review, and well-documented reports of evidence-based effective practices. Only original papers are considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信