Katherine L. Buchanan, Milena Keller-Margulis, Amanda Hut, Weihua Fan, Sarah S. Mire, G. Thomas Schanding
{"title":"早期写作评估工具的系统回顾","authors":"Katherine L. Buchanan, Milena Keller-Margulis, Amanda Hut, Weihua Fan, Sarah S. Mire, G. Thomas Schanding","doi":"10.1007/s10643-024-01697-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>There is considerable research regarding measures of early reading but much less in early writing. Nevertheless, writing is a critical skill for success in school and early difficulties in writing are likely to persist without intervention. A necessary step toward identifying those students who need additional support is the use of screening tools. The purpose of this study was to identify tools used with emergent writers and summarize the current state of this empirical literature. A systematic review was conducted for publications between 1990 and 2022. A total of 59 studies focused on early writing for preschool or kindergarten students and met criteria for inclusion in the review. Results indicated the most used early writing measure was Name Writing followed by Letter Writing, and Spelling tasks with some studies using this specific combination of measures. Despite some consistency in the measures used, there was significant variation in the scoring approach. Review of technical adequacy indicated 65% of studies included reliability data while considerably fewer included validity. Future studies using consistent approaches to scoring early writing tasks and additional examinations of validity are needed to improve educators’ ability to identify and intervene in this skill area.</p>","PeriodicalId":47818,"journal":{"name":"Early Childhood Education Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Systematic Review of Early Writing Assessment Tools\",\"authors\":\"Katherine L. Buchanan, Milena Keller-Margulis, Amanda Hut, Weihua Fan, Sarah S. Mire, G. Thomas Schanding\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10643-024-01697-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>There is considerable research regarding measures of early reading but much less in early writing. Nevertheless, writing is a critical skill for success in school and early difficulties in writing are likely to persist without intervention. A necessary step toward identifying those students who need additional support is the use of screening tools. The purpose of this study was to identify tools used with emergent writers and summarize the current state of this empirical literature. A systematic review was conducted for publications between 1990 and 2022. A total of 59 studies focused on early writing for preschool or kindergarten students and met criteria for inclusion in the review. Results indicated the most used early writing measure was Name Writing followed by Letter Writing, and Spelling tasks with some studies using this specific combination of measures. Despite some consistency in the measures used, there was significant variation in the scoring approach. Review of technical adequacy indicated 65% of studies included reliability data while considerably fewer included validity. Future studies using consistent approaches to scoring early writing tasks and additional examinations of validity are needed to improve educators’ ability to identify and intervene in this skill area.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47818,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Early Childhood Education Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Early Childhood Education Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-024-01697-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early Childhood Education Journal","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-024-01697-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Systematic Review of Early Writing Assessment Tools
There is considerable research regarding measures of early reading but much less in early writing. Nevertheless, writing is a critical skill for success in school and early difficulties in writing are likely to persist without intervention. A necessary step toward identifying those students who need additional support is the use of screening tools. The purpose of this study was to identify tools used with emergent writers and summarize the current state of this empirical literature. A systematic review was conducted for publications between 1990 and 2022. A total of 59 studies focused on early writing for preschool or kindergarten students and met criteria for inclusion in the review. Results indicated the most used early writing measure was Name Writing followed by Letter Writing, and Spelling tasks with some studies using this specific combination of measures. Despite some consistency in the measures used, there was significant variation in the scoring approach. Review of technical adequacy indicated 65% of studies included reliability data while considerably fewer included validity. Future studies using consistent approaches to scoring early writing tasks and additional examinations of validity are needed to improve educators’ ability to identify and intervene in this skill area.
期刊介绍:
Early Childhood Education Journal is a professional publication of original peer-reviewed articles that reflect exemplary practices in the field of contemporary early childhood education. Articles cover the social, physical, emotional, and intellectual development of children age birth through 8, analyzing issues, trends, and practices from an educational perspective. The journal publishes feature-length articles that skillfully blend 1) theory, research, and practice, 2) descriptions of outstanding early childhood programs worldwide, and 3) quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods research. Early Childhood Education Journal is of interest not only to classroom teachers, child care providers, college and university faculty, and administrators, but also to other professionals in psychology, health care, family relations, and social services dedicated to the care of young children.
Areas of Emphasis:
International studies;
Educational programs in diverse settings;
Early learning across multiple domains;
Projects demonstrating inter-professional collaboration;
Qualitative and quantitative research and case studies;
Best practices in early childhood teacher education;
Theory, research, and practice relating to professional development;
Family, school, and community relationships;
Investigations related to curriculum and instruction;
Articles that link theory and best practices;
Reviews of research with well-articulated connections to the field