{"title":"反馈类型重要吗？在相互依存的团队合作中，过程反馈优于绩效反馈","authors":"Vera Hagemann, Julian Decius","doi":"10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Feedback plays an important role for individuals and teams. While there is a lot of research on performance feedback, positive effects of process feedback (divided into individual- and team-level) are little studied. In particular, the simultaneous consideration of individual variables and feedback characteristics and their influence on feedback perceptions in the feedback process is missing.</p></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><p>The present study analyzes the effects of three feedback conditions (i.e., performance feedback, team-level process feedback, and individual-level process feedback) on feedback perceptions (i.e., usefulness and fairness), as well as on feedback acceptance and team awareness.</p></div><div><h3>Sample</h3><p>142 randomly assigned two-person teams.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Each team worked on four computer-based team tasks in the C³Fire microworld and received one type of feedback after completing each 15-min scenario. Measurements were taken after the second (T1) and fourth (T2) scenarios.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Structural equation modeling results revealed positive effects of feedback orientation at T0 on feedback usefulness and feedback fairness at T1, and of usefulness and fairness on feedback acceptance at T2. Feedback usefulness (but not fairness) was also a positive predictor of team awareness at T2. Team-level process feedback resulted in overall positive effects on usefulness and fairness. In general, the effects on perceived usefulness appeared to be stronger than on perceived fairness of the feedback.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Team-level process feedback in teamwork and individual feedback orientation are important for perceived usefulness and fairness of the feedback. Team awareness may be enhanced by increasing feedback usefulness; feedback acceptance may be enhanced by increasing feedback usefulness and fairness.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48357,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Instruction","volume":"93 ","pages":"Article 101949"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475224000768/pdfft?md5=e0d9f44f59b5c6a99ce12edb9519d579&pid=1-s2.0-S0959475224000768-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does feedback type matter? The superiority of process feedback over performance feedback in interdependent teamwork\",\"authors\":\"Vera Hagemann, Julian Decius\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101949\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Feedback plays an important role for individuals and teams. While there is a lot of research on performance feedback, positive effects of process feedback (divided into individual- and team-level) are little studied. In particular, the simultaneous consideration of individual variables and feedback characteristics and their influence on feedback perceptions in the feedback process is missing.</p></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><p>The present study analyzes the effects of three feedback conditions (i.e., performance feedback, team-level process feedback, and individual-level process feedback) on feedback perceptions (i.e., usefulness and fairness), as well as on feedback acceptance and team awareness.</p></div><div><h3>Sample</h3><p>142 randomly assigned two-person teams.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Each team worked on four computer-based team tasks in the C³Fire microworld and received one type of feedback after completing each 15-min scenario. Measurements were taken after the second (T1) and fourth (T2) scenarios.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Structural equation modeling results revealed positive effects of feedback orientation at T0 on feedback usefulness and feedback fairness at T1, and of usefulness and fairness on feedback acceptance at T2. Feedback usefulness (but not fairness) was also a positive predictor of team awareness at T2. Team-level process feedback resulted in overall positive effects on usefulness and fairness. In general, the effects on perceived usefulness appeared to be stronger than on perceived fairness of the feedback.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Team-level process feedback in teamwork and individual feedback orientation are important for perceived usefulness and fairness of the feedback. Team awareness may be enhanced by increasing feedback usefulness; feedback acceptance may be enhanced by increasing feedback usefulness and fairness.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learning and Instruction\",\"volume\":\"93 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101949\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475224000768/pdfft?md5=e0d9f44f59b5c6a99ce12edb9519d579&pid=1-s2.0-S0959475224000768-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learning and Instruction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475224000768\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475224000768","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Does feedback type matter? The superiority of process feedback over performance feedback in interdependent teamwork
Background
Feedback plays an important role for individuals and teams. While there is a lot of research on performance feedback, positive effects of process feedback (divided into individual- and team-level) are little studied. In particular, the simultaneous consideration of individual variables and feedback characteristics and their influence on feedback perceptions in the feedback process is missing.
Aims
The present study analyzes the effects of three feedback conditions (i.e., performance feedback, team-level process feedback, and individual-level process feedback) on feedback perceptions (i.e., usefulness and fairness), as well as on feedback acceptance and team awareness.
Sample
142 randomly assigned two-person teams.
Methods
Each team worked on four computer-based team tasks in the C³Fire microworld and received one type of feedback after completing each 15-min scenario. Measurements were taken after the second (T1) and fourth (T2) scenarios.
Results
Structural equation modeling results revealed positive effects of feedback orientation at T0 on feedback usefulness and feedback fairness at T1, and of usefulness and fairness on feedback acceptance at T2. Feedback usefulness (but not fairness) was also a positive predictor of team awareness at T2. Team-level process feedback resulted in overall positive effects on usefulness and fairness. In general, the effects on perceived usefulness appeared to be stronger than on perceived fairness of the feedback.
Conclusions
Team-level process feedback in teamwork and individual feedback orientation are important for perceived usefulness and fairness of the feedback. Team awareness may be enhanced by increasing feedback usefulness; feedback acceptance may be enhanced by increasing feedback usefulness and fairness.
期刊介绍：
As an international, multi-disciplinary, peer-refereed journal, Learning and Instruction provides a platform for the publication of the most advanced scientific research in the areas of learning, development, instruction and teaching. The journal welcomes original empirical investigations. The papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and different methodological approaches. They may refer to any age level, from infants to adults and to a diversity of learning and instructional settings, from laboratory experiments to field studies. The major criteria in the review and the selection process concern the significance of the contribution to the area of learning and instruction, and the rigor of the study.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
