Melanie V. Keller, Markus Dresel, Martin Daumiller
{"title":"成就目标和自我效能对反馈的使用有影响吗?","authors":"Melanie V. Keller, Markus Dresel, Martin Daumiller","doi":"10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Instructor feedback in higher education is widely acknowledged as being beneficial for learning and achievement. Students’ motivation as a central determinant of how students perceive feedback and incorporate it into their learning process offers potential to explain and foster successful feedback use but is still little understood. In detail, students’ achievement goals, serving as representations of what students strive for in learning settings, and students’ self-efficacy for revision, are two particularly relevant motivational concepts that can offer insights into how students perceive feedback and use it for revising their work.</p></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><p>In this study, we aim to elucidate how achievement goals and self-efficacy explain feedback perception and use.</p></div><div><h3>Methods and Sample</h3><p>A sample of 182 German higher education students reported on their achievement goals for a task, self-efficacy for revising their task, perceived usefulness of the feedback they received, and achievement emotions when reading their feedback in three separate feedback occasions. The use of the feedback for revising their task was measured with both self-report measures and a computer-based similarity score.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Results of two-level path modeling revealed self-efficacy for revision to be linked to perceived usefulness of feedback and emotions while receiving feedback, as well as feedback use. Learning and work avoidance goals for the task predicted perceived usefulness of feedback, which was in turn the strongest predictor of feedback use.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The findings support the theoretical role of motivational factors for feedback perception and use, and emphasize the importance of fostering students’ self-efficacy in utilizing feedback and encouraging learning goals.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48357,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Instruction","volume":"93 ","pages":"Article 101948"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475224000756/pdfft?md5=98a781346fb7e34a9d4d9eff62f813db&pid=1-s2.0-S0959475224000756-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do achievement goals and self-efficacy matter for feedback use?\",\"authors\":\"Melanie V. Keller, Markus Dresel, Martin Daumiller\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101948\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Instructor feedback in higher education is widely acknowledged as being beneficial for learning and achievement. Students’ motivation as a central determinant of how students perceive feedback and incorporate it into their learning process offers potential to explain and foster successful feedback use but is still little understood. In detail, students’ achievement goals, serving as representations of what students strive for in learning settings, and students’ self-efficacy for revision, are two particularly relevant motivational concepts that can offer insights into how students perceive feedback and use it for revising their work.</p></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><p>In this study, we aim to elucidate how achievement goals and self-efficacy explain feedback perception and use.</p></div><div><h3>Methods and Sample</h3><p>A sample of 182 German higher education students reported on their achievement goals for a task, self-efficacy for revising their task, perceived usefulness of the feedback they received, and achievement emotions when reading their feedback in three separate feedback occasions. The use of the feedback for revising their task was measured with both self-report measures and a computer-based similarity score.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Results of two-level path modeling revealed self-efficacy for revision to be linked to perceived usefulness of feedback and emotions while receiving feedback, as well as feedback use. Learning and work avoidance goals for the task predicted perceived usefulness of feedback, which was in turn the strongest predictor of feedback use.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The findings support the theoretical role of motivational factors for feedback perception and use, and emphasize the importance of fostering students’ self-efficacy in utilizing feedback and encouraging learning goals.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learning and Instruction\",\"volume\":\"93 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101948\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475224000756/pdfft?md5=98a781346fb7e34a9d4d9eff62f813db&pid=1-s2.0-S0959475224000756-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learning and Instruction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475224000756\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475224000756","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Do achievement goals and self-efficacy matter for feedback use?
Background
Instructor feedback in higher education is widely acknowledged as being beneficial for learning and achievement. Students’ motivation as a central determinant of how students perceive feedback and incorporate it into their learning process offers potential to explain and foster successful feedback use but is still little understood. In detail, students’ achievement goals, serving as representations of what students strive for in learning settings, and students’ self-efficacy for revision, are two particularly relevant motivational concepts that can offer insights into how students perceive feedback and use it for revising their work.
Aims
In this study, we aim to elucidate how achievement goals and self-efficacy explain feedback perception and use.
Methods and Sample
A sample of 182 German higher education students reported on their achievement goals for a task, self-efficacy for revising their task, perceived usefulness of the feedback they received, and achievement emotions when reading their feedback in three separate feedback occasions. The use of the feedback for revising their task was measured with both self-report measures and a computer-based similarity score.
Results
Results of two-level path modeling revealed self-efficacy for revision to be linked to perceived usefulness of feedback and emotions while receiving feedback, as well as feedback use. Learning and work avoidance goals for the task predicted perceived usefulness of feedback, which was in turn the strongest predictor of feedback use.
Conclusions
The findings support the theoretical role of motivational factors for feedback perception and use, and emphasize the importance of fostering students’ self-efficacy in utilizing feedback and encouraging learning goals.
期刊介绍:
As an international, multi-disciplinary, peer-refereed journal, Learning and Instruction provides a platform for the publication of the most advanced scientific research in the areas of learning, development, instruction and teaching. The journal welcomes original empirical investigations. The papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and different methodological approaches. They may refer to any age level, from infants to adults and to a diversity of learning and instructional settings, from laboratory experiments to field studies. The major criteria in the review and the selection process concern the significance of the contribution to the area of learning and instruction, and the rigor of the study.