评估 "生活与关爱时间 "的有效性:支持痴呆症照护者利用休息时间的在线干预。

IF 4.9 3区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Innovation in Aging Pub Date : 2024-04-26 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1093/geroni/igae043
Eli Iacob, Michael Caserta, Gary Donaldson, Catharine Sparks, Alexandra Terrill, Amber Thompson, Bob Wong, Rebecca L Utz
{"title":"评估 \"生活与关爱时间 \"的有效性:支持痴呆症照护者利用休息时间的在线干预。","authors":"Eli Iacob, Michael Caserta, Gary Donaldson, Catharine Sparks, Alexandra Terrill, Amber Thompson, Bob Wong, Rebecca L Utz","doi":"10.1093/geroni/igae043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Respite, defined as time away from caregiving, is the most requested type of caregiver support. Time for Living and Caring (TLC) is a virtual coaching \"app\" that helps caregivers schedule and plan their respite time-use. The objectives of this analysis are: (1) to assess the efficacy of the TLC intervention on respite time-use and on caregiver well-being and (2) to identify the key features of the intervention that serve as the likely mechanism of action.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>A sample of dementia caregivers (<i>n</i> = 163, 79% female, 84% White, 6% Hispanic, average age 62) were randomized into one of two intervention delivery methods. Intervention efficacy was evaluated using pre/post-comparisons of respite time-use and an additive \"dosing\" model that estimated unique parameters associated with the exposure to each specific intervention component.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both immediate and delayed-attention groups reported increased respite time. They also improved in their ability to plan and perceive benefit from their respite time-use over the 16-week intervention period. At 8 weeks, the immediate group did not change in anxiety, whereas the delayed group worsened (<i>p</i> < .001). At 16 weeks, the groups were similar in their anxiety levels. By the 20-week follow-up period, when neither group had access to TLC, both experienced an increase in anxiety.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>TLC is a promising intervention that may support caregivers' well-being, by helping them schedule and plan their respite to maximize its benefit. The provision of weekly coaching seems to be the intervention component (mechanism) associated with caregiver outcomes.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>NCT03689179.</p>","PeriodicalId":13596,"journal":{"name":"Innovation in Aging","volume":"8 5","pages":"igae043"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11129597/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the Efficacy of Time for Living and Caring: An Online Intervention to Support Dementia Caregivers' Use of Respite.\",\"authors\":\"Eli Iacob, Michael Caserta, Gary Donaldson, Catharine Sparks, Alexandra Terrill, Amber Thompson, Bob Wong, Rebecca L Utz\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/geroni/igae043\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Respite, defined as time away from caregiving, is the most requested type of caregiver support. Time for Living and Caring (TLC) is a virtual coaching \\\"app\\\" that helps caregivers schedule and plan their respite time-use. The objectives of this analysis are: (1) to assess the efficacy of the TLC intervention on respite time-use and on caregiver well-being and (2) to identify the key features of the intervention that serve as the likely mechanism of action.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>A sample of dementia caregivers (<i>n</i> = 163, 79% female, 84% White, 6% Hispanic, average age 62) were randomized into one of two intervention delivery methods. Intervention efficacy was evaluated using pre/post-comparisons of respite time-use and an additive \\\"dosing\\\" model that estimated unique parameters associated with the exposure to each specific intervention component.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both immediate and delayed-attention groups reported increased respite time. They also improved in their ability to plan and perceive benefit from their respite time-use over the 16-week intervention period. At 8 weeks, the immediate group did not change in anxiety, whereas the delayed group worsened (<i>p</i> < .001). At 16 weeks, the groups were similar in their anxiety levels. By the 20-week follow-up period, when neither group had access to TLC, both experienced an increase in anxiety.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>TLC is a promising intervention that may support caregivers' well-being, by helping them schedule and plan their respite to maximize its benefit. The provision of weekly coaching seems to be the intervention component (mechanism) associated with caregiver outcomes.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>NCT03689179.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13596,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Innovation in Aging\",\"volume\":\"8 5\",\"pages\":\"igae043\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11129597/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Innovation in Aging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igae043\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation in Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igae043","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目标:喘息时间,即离开护理工作的时间,是护理人员最需要的支持类型。Time for Living and Caring (TLC) 是一款虚拟辅导 "应用程序",可帮助照顾者安排和计划其暂休时间的使用。本分析报告的目的是(1) 评估 TLC 干预措施对暂休时间使用和照护者福祉的效果;(2) 确定该干预措施的关键特征,作为可能的作用机制:将痴呆症护理人员样本(n = 163,79% 为女性,84% 为白人,6% 为西班牙裔,平均年龄 62 岁)随机分为两种干预方法。干预效果的评估采用了休息时间使用前后比较法和一个加法 "剂量 "模型,该模型估算了与接触每个特定干预成分相关的独特参数:结果:立即关注组和延迟关注组都报告说他们的暂休时间增加了。在为期 16 周的干预期间,他们还提高了计划暂休时间的能力,并从暂休时间的使用中获益。在 8 周时,立即关注组的焦虑情绪没有变化,而延迟关注组的焦虑情绪有所恶化(p 讨论和启示:TLC是一项很有前景的干预措施,它可以帮助照顾者安排和规划暂休时间,使其受益最大化,从而为照顾者的福祉提供支持。提供每周辅导似乎是与护理人员结果相关的干预成分(机制):临床试验注册:NCT03689179。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating the Efficacy of Time for Living and Caring: An Online Intervention to Support Dementia Caregivers' Use of Respite.

Background and objectives: Respite, defined as time away from caregiving, is the most requested type of caregiver support. Time for Living and Caring (TLC) is a virtual coaching "app" that helps caregivers schedule and plan their respite time-use. The objectives of this analysis are: (1) to assess the efficacy of the TLC intervention on respite time-use and on caregiver well-being and (2) to identify the key features of the intervention that serve as the likely mechanism of action.

Research design and methods: A sample of dementia caregivers (n = 163, 79% female, 84% White, 6% Hispanic, average age 62) were randomized into one of two intervention delivery methods. Intervention efficacy was evaluated using pre/post-comparisons of respite time-use and an additive "dosing" model that estimated unique parameters associated with the exposure to each specific intervention component.

Results: Both immediate and delayed-attention groups reported increased respite time. They also improved in their ability to plan and perceive benefit from their respite time-use over the 16-week intervention period. At 8 weeks, the immediate group did not change in anxiety, whereas the delayed group worsened (p < .001). At 16 weeks, the groups were similar in their anxiety levels. By the 20-week follow-up period, when neither group had access to TLC, both experienced an increase in anxiety.

Discussion and implications: TLC is a promising intervention that may support caregivers' well-being, by helping them schedule and plan their respite to maximize its benefit. The provision of weekly coaching seems to be the intervention component (mechanism) associated with caregiver outcomes.

Clinical trial registration: NCT03689179.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Innovation in Aging
Innovation in Aging GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Innovation in Aging, an interdisciplinary Open Access journal of the Gerontological Society of America (GSA), is dedicated to publishing innovative, conceptually robust, and methodologically rigorous research focused on aging and the life course. The journal aims to present studies with the potential to significantly enhance the health, functionality, and overall well-being of older adults by translating scientific insights into practical applications. Research published in the journal spans a variety of settings, including community, clinical, and laboratory contexts, with a clear emphasis on issues that are directly pertinent to aging and the dynamics of life over time. The content of the journal mirrors the diverse research interests of GSA members and encompasses a range of study types. These include the validation of new conceptual or theoretical models, assessments of factors impacting the health and well-being of older adults, evaluations of interventions and policies, the implementation of groundbreaking research methodologies, interdisciplinary research that adapts concepts and methods from other fields to aging studies, and the use of modeling and simulations to understand factors and processes influencing aging outcomes. The journal welcomes contributions from scholars across various disciplines, such as technology, engineering, architecture, economics, business, law, political science, public policy, education, public health, social and psychological sciences, biomedical and health sciences, and the humanities and arts, reflecting a holistic approach to advancing knowledge in gerontology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信