{"title":"方波伏安法最大化分析物和最小化氧化还原干扰信号的电流平均化策略","authors":"Katherine J. Levey, and , Julie V. Macpherson*, ","doi":"10.1021/acs.analchem.4c01053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Square wave voltammetry (SWV) is commonly used in electroanalytical applications to enhance analyte faradaic signals and minimize nonfaradaic processes. However, little attention is given as to how best use SWV to minimize faradaic interference signals that arise from redox species present in solution that have redox potentials that convolute with that of the analyte. In conventional SWV, a series of current–time (<i>i</i>–<i>t</i>) transients are collected, and <i>i</i> is averaged over a specified window of each transient (potentiostat dependent). This average <i>i</i> is reported against the electrode potential, <i>E</i>. As the <i>i</i>–<i>t</i> response is governed by the type of electron transfer reaction under investigation, we show how by collecting all <i>i</i>–<i>t</i> data and through judicious choice of the current averaging window, it is possible to enhance the analyte response while at the same time reducing the interferent signal. We look at three different electron transfer reactions, fast electron transfer outer sphere, metal electrodeposition/stripping, and surface-confined proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET) and demonstrate different <i>i</i>–<i>t</i> behaviors in SWV, visually aided by the use of 3D <i>i</i>–<i>t</i>–<i>E</i> plots. In the case of PCET quinone-based voltammetric sensing of pH in the presence of a heavy metal (here Cu<sup>2+</sup>), we show that the use of a much earlier current averaging window (2–10% of the <i>i</i>–<i>t</i> response) results in the pH signal being clearly distinguished from that of the overlapping heavy metal.</p>","PeriodicalId":27,"journal":{"name":"Analytical Chemistry","volume":"96 23","pages":"9561–9569"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acs.analchem.4c01053","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Current Averaging Strategy for Maximizing Analyte and Minimizing Redox Interference Signals with Square Wave Voltammetry\",\"authors\":\"Katherine J. Levey, and , Julie V. Macpherson*, \",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.analchem.4c01053\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Square wave voltammetry (SWV) is commonly used in electroanalytical applications to enhance analyte faradaic signals and minimize nonfaradaic processes. However, little attention is given as to how best use SWV to minimize faradaic interference signals that arise from redox species present in solution that have redox potentials that convolute with that of the analyte. In conventional SWV, a series of current–time (<i>i</i>–<i>t</i>) transients are collected, and <i>i</i> is averaged over a specified window of each transient (potentiostat dependent). This average <i>i</i> is reported against the electrode potential, <i>E</i>. As the <i>i</i>–<i>t</i> response is governed by the type of electron transfer reaction under investigation, we show how by collecting all <i>i</i>–<i>t</i> data and through judicious choice of the current averaging window, it is possible to enhance the analyte response while at the same time reducing the interferent signal. We look at three different electron transfer reactions, fast electron transfer outer sphere, metal electrodeposition/stripping, and surface-confined proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET) and demonstrate different <i>i</i>–<i>t</i> behaviors in SWV, visually aided by the use of 3D <i>i</i>–<i>t</i>–<i>E</i> plots. In the case of PCET quinone-based voltammetric sensing of pH in the presence of a heavy metal (here Cu<sup>2+</sup>), we show that the use of a much earlier current averaging window (2–10% of the <i>i</i>–<i>t</i> response) results in the pH signal being clearly distinguished from that of the overlapping heavy metal.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":27,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Analytical Chemistry\",\"volume\":\"96 23\",\"pages\":\"9561–9569\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acs.analchem.4c01053\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Analytical Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.analchem.4c01053\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytical Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.analchem.4c01053","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Current Averaging Strategy for Maximizing Analyte and Minimizing Redox Interference Signals with Square Wave Voltammetry
Square wave voltammetry (SWV) is commonly used in electroanalytical applications to enhance analyte faradaic signals and minimize nonfaradaic processes. However, little attention is given as to how best use SWV to minimize faradaic interference signals that arise from redox species present in solution that have redox potentials that convolute with that of the analyte. In conventional SWV, a series of current–time (i–t) transients are collected, and i is averaged over a specified window of each transient (potentiostat dependent). This average i is reported against the electrode potential, E. As the i–t response is governed by the type of electron transfer reaction under investigation, we show how by collecting all i–t data and through judicious choice of the current averaging window, it is possible to enhance the analyte response while at the same time reducing the interferent signal. We look at three different electron transfer reactions, fast electron transfer outer sphere, metal electrodeposition/stripping, and surface-confined proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET) and demonstrate different i–t behaviors in SWV, visually aided by the use of 3D i–t–E plots. In the case of PCET quinone-based voltammetric sensing of pH in the presence of a heavy metal (here Cu2+), we show that the use of a much earlier current averaging window (2–10% of the i–t response) results in the pH signal being clearly distinguished from that of the overlapping heavy metal.
期刊介绍:
Analytical Chemistry, a peer-reviewed research journal, focuses on disseminating new and original knowledge across all branches of analytical chemistry. Fundamental articles may explore general principles of chemical measurement science and need not directly address existing or potential analytical methodology. They can be entirely theoretical or report experimental results. Contributions may cover various phases of analytical operations, including sampling, bioanalysis, electrochemistry, mass spectrometry, microscale and nanoscale systems, environmental analysis, separations, spectroscopy, chemical reactions and selectivity, instrumentation, imaging, surface analysis, and data processing. Papers discussing known analytical methods should present a significant, original application of the method, a notable improvement, or results on an important analyte.