Estée Rubien-Thomas , Yen-Chu Lin , Ivan Chan , May I. Conley , Lena Skalaban , Hailey Kopp , Arya Adake , Jennifer A. Richeson , Dylan G. Gee , Arielle Baskin-Sommers , BJ Casey
{"title":"参与者和刺激物种族对青少年认知能力的交互影响:ABCD 研究的启示","authors":"Estée Rubien-Thomas , Yen-Chu Lin , Ivan Chan , May I. Conley , Lena Skalaban , Hailey Kopp , Arya Adake , Jennifer A. Richeson , Dylan G. Gee , Arielle Baskin-Sommers , BJ Casey","doi":"10.1016/j.dcn.2024.101393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>An extensive literature shows that race information can impact cognitive performance. Two key findings include an attentional bias to Black racial cues in U.S. samples and diminished recognition of other-race faces compared to same-race faces in predominantly White adult samples. Yet face stimuli are increasingly used in psychological research often unrelated to race (Conley et al., 2018) or without consideration for how race information may influence cognitive performance, especially among developmental participants from different racial groups. In the current study we used open-access data from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development<sup>SM</sup> (ABCD) Study® 4.0.1 release to test for developmentally similar other- and same-race effects of Black and White face stimuli on attention, working memory, and recognition memory in 9- and 10-year-old Black and White children (n=5,659) living in the U.S. Black and White children showed better performance when attending to Black versus White faces. We also show an advantage in recognition memory of same-race compared to other-race faces in White children that did not generalize to Black children. Together the findings highlight how race information, even when irrelevant to an experiment, may indirectly lead to misinterpretation of group differences in cognitive performance in children of different racial backgrounds.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49083,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience","volume":"67 ","pages":"Article 101393"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878929324000549/pdfft?md5=9a50400859d5037a0fa6b66fed525a4e&pid=1-s2.0-S1878929324000549-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interactive effects of participant and stimulus race on cognitive performance in youth: Insights from the ABCD study\",\"authors\":\"Estée Rubien-Thomas , Yen-Chu Lin , Ivan Chan , May I. Conley , Lena Skalaban , Hailey Kopp , Arya Adake , Jennifer A. Richeson , Dylan G. Gee , Arielle Baskin-Sommers , BJ Casey\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.dcn.2024.101393\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>An extensive literature shows that race information can impact cognitive performance. Two key findings include an attentional bias to Black racial cues in U.S. samples and diminished recognition of other-race faces compared to same-race faces in predominantly White adult samples. Yet face stimuli are increasingly used in psychological research often unrelated to race (Conley et al., 2018) or without consideration for how race information may influence cognitive performance, especially among developmental participants from different racial groups. In the current study we used open-access data from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development<sup>SM</sup> (ABCD) Study® 4.0.1 release to test for developmentally similar other- and same-race effects of Black and White face stimuli on attention, working memory, and recognition memory in 9- and 10-year-old Black and White children (n=5,659) living in the U.S. Black and White children showed better performance when attending to Black versus White faces. We also show an advantage in recognition memory of same-race compared to other-race faces in White children that did not generalize to Black children. Together the findings highlight how race information, even when irrelevant to an experiment, may indirectly lead to misinterpretation of group differences in cognitive performance in children of different racial backgrounds.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49083,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"67 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101393\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878929324000549/pdfft?md5=9a50400859d5037a0fa6b66fed525a4e&pid=1-s2.0-S1878929324000549-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878929324000549\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878929324000549","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
大量文献表明,种族信息会影响认知能力。其中两个重要发现包括:在美国样本中,黑人种族线索会引起注意偏差;在以白人为主的成人样本中,与同种族面孔相比,其他种族面孔的识别能力较弱。然而,心理学研究中越来越多地使用人脸刺激,这些刺激往往与种族无关(Conley et al.在本研究中,我们使用了青少年大脑认知发展SM(ABCD)研究® 4.0.1版的开放存取数据,测试了生活在美国的9岁和10岁黑人和白人儿童(n=5,659)在发展过程中黑白人脸刺激对注意力、工作记忆和识别记忆的他种和同种影响。我们还显示,白人儿童对同一种族面孔的识别记忆优于其他种族面孔,但这一优势并没有推广到黑人儿童身上。这些发现共同强调了种族信息,即使与实验无关,也可能间接导致对不同种族背景儿童认知表现的群体差异的误读。
Interactive effects of participant and stimulus race on cognitive performance in youth: Insights from the ABCD study
An extensive literature shows that race information can impact cognitive performance. Two key findings include an attentional bias to Black racial cues in U.S. samples and diminished recognition of other-race faces compared to same-race faces in predominantly White adult samples. Yet face stimuli are increasingly used in psychological research often unrelated to race (Conley et al., 2018) or without consideration for how race information may influence cognitive performance, especially among developmental participants from different racial groups. In the current study we used open-access data from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive DevelopmentSM (ABCD) Study® 4.0.1 release to test for developmentally similar other- and same-race effects of Black and White face stimuli on attention, working memory, and recognition memory in 9- and 10-year-old Black and White children (n=5,659) living in the U.S. Black and White children showed better performance when attending to Black versus White faces. We also show an advantage in recognition memory of same-race compared to other-race faces in White children that did not generalize to Black children. Together the findings highlight how race information, even when irrelevant to an experiment, may indirectly lead to misinterpretation of group differences in cognitive performance in children of different racial backgrounds.
期刊介绍:
The journal publishes theoretical and research papers on cognitive brain development, from infancy through childhood and adolescence and into adulthood. It covers neurocognitive development and neurocognitive processing in both typical and atypical development, including social and affective aspects. Appropriate methodologies for the journal include, but are not limited to, functional neuroimaging (fMRI and MEG), electrophysiology (EEG and ERP), NIRS and transcranial magnetic stimulation, as well as other basic neuroscience approaches using cellular and animal models that directly address cognitive brain development, patient studies, case studies, post-mortem studies and pharmacological studies.