Danielle A Bazer, Anna Kolchinski, N. Bush, Jennifer L Clarke, Stephen J Bagley, K. Schreck
{"title":"BRAFV600E胶质瘤患者无药假:减少靶向疗法剂量的论据","authors":"Danielle A Bazer, Anna Kolchinski, N. Bush, Jennifer L Clarke, Stephen J Bagley, K. Schreck","doi":"10.1093/nop/npae046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Combined BRAF and MEK inhibition is effective for some BRAFV600E altered gliomas, a cancer for which there are few effective therapies. While recent clinical trials demonstrate objective response rates of 30-40%, tolerable adverse event rates are 70-90% and 12-15% patients stop therapy for toxicity. There are no clear guidelines regarding timing and re-initiation of BRAF-targeted therapies following drug holidays. Here, we describe four patients with rapid disease progression during periods of treatment interruption. All patients experienced response upon resumption of targeted therapy.\n \n \n \n This is a multi-institutional, retrospective review of 4 patients.\n \n \n \n Three patients were diagnosed with BRAFV600E mutated anaplastic pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma (aPXA) and one with epithelioid glioblastoma. The age range was 32 to 46; three patients were female and one patient was male. All patients were initially treated with radiation and were subsequently treated with BRAF/MEK inhibitors after disease progression. All patients with aPXA required the targeted therapy to be held due to toxicity and one patient held the therapy prior to transitioning to a novel BRAF-targeted agent. All patients were restarted on BRAF/MEK inhibitors after a drug holiday. Three patients required a dose reduction and all improved clinically following reinitiation.\n \n \n \n Clinical and radiographic progression may occur rapidly upon holding BRAF-targeted therapy, warranting judicious dose-reductions and minimization of drug holidays\n","PeriodicalId":19234,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"No drug holidays in BRAFV600E glioma patients: an argument for dose reduction of targeted therapies\",\"authors\":\"Danielle A Bazer, Anna Kolchinski, N. Bush, Jennifer L Clarke, Stephen J Bagley, K. Schreck\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/nop/npae046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n Combined BRAF and MEK inhibition is effective for some BRAFV600E altered gliomas, a cancer for which there are few effective therapies. While recent clinical trials demonstrate objective response rates of 30-40%, tolerable adverse event rates are 70-90% and 12-15% patients stop therapy for toxicity. There are no clear guidelines regarding timing and re-initiation of BRAF-targeted therapies following drug holidays. Here, we describe four patients with rapid disease progression during periods of treatment interruption. All patients experienced response upon resumption of targeted therapy.\\n \\n \\n \\n This is a multi-institutional, retrospective review of 4 patients.\\n \\n \\n \\n Three patients were diagnosed with BRAFV600E mutated anaplastic pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma (aPXA) and one with epithelioid glioblastoma. The age range was 32 to 46; three patients were female and one patient was male. All patients were initially treated with radiation and were subsequently treated with BRAF/MEK inhibitors after disease progression. All patients with aPXA required the targeted therapy to be held due to toxicity and one patient held the therapy prior to transitioning to a novel BRAF-targeted agent. All patients were restarted on BRAF/MEK inhibitors after a drug holiday. Three patients required a dose reduction and all improved clinically following reinitiation.\\n \\n \\n \\n Clinical and radiographic progression may occur rapidly upon holding BRAF-targeted therapy, warranting judicious dose-reductions and minimization of drug holidays\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":19234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuro-oncology practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuro-oncology practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/nop/npae046\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuro-oncology practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/nop/npae046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
No drug holidays in BRAFV600E glioma patients: an argument for dose reduction of targeted therapies
Combined BRAF and MEK inhibition is effective for some BRAFV600E altered gliomas, a cancer for which there are few effective therapies. While recent clinical trials demonstrate objective response rates of 30-40%, tolerable adverse event rates are 70-90% and 12-15% patients stop therapy for toxicity. There are no clear guidelines regarding timing and re-initiation of BRAF-targeted therapies following drug holidays. Here, we describe four patients with rapid disease progression during periods of treatment interruption. All patients experienced response upon resumption of targeted therapy.
This is a multi-institutional, retrospective review of 4 patients.
Three patients were diagnosed with BRAFV600E mutated anaplastic pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma (aPXA) and one with epithelioid glioblastoma. The age range was 32 to 46; three patients were female and one patient was male. All patients were initially treated with radiation and were subsequently treated with BRAF/MEK inhibitors after disease progression. All patients with aPXA required the targeted therapy to be held due to toxicity and one patient held the therapy prior to transitioning to a novel BRAF-targeted agent. All patients were restarted on BRAF/MEK inhibitors after a drug holiday. Three patients required a dose reduction and all improved clinically following reinitiation.
Clinical and radiographic progression may occur rapidly upon holding BRAF-targeted therapy, warranting judicious dose-reductions and minimization of drug holidays
期刊介绍:
Neuro-Oncology Practice focuses on the clinical aspects of the subspecialty for practicing clinicians and healthcare specialists from a variety of disciplines including physicians, nurses, physical/occupational therapists, neuropsychologists, and palliative care specialists, who have focused their careers on clinical patient care and who want to apply the latest treatment advances to their practice. These include: Applying new trial results to improve standards of patient care Translating scientific advances such as tumor molecular profiling and advanced imaging into clinical treatment decision making and personalized brain tumor therapies Raising awareness of basic, translational and clinical research in areas of symptom management, survivorship, neurocognitive function, end of life issues and caregiving