专家对适当认识表现的调整：实用知识的作用

IF 3 1区教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH

Journal of the Learning Sciences Pub Date : 2024-04-23 DOI:10.1080/10508406.2024.2338937

Victor M. Deekens, Brian M. Cartiff, Jeffrey A. Greene

引用次数: 0

摘要

当今复杂的信息环境要求有效地浏览和分析多种信息来源，以便就复杂的主题做出可靠的决策。学习者必须建立可靠的思维方式，以便在复杂的信息环境中做出可靠的决策。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Experts’ adaptation of apt epistemic performance: The role of practical knowledge

Today’s complex information environment requires effective navigation and analysis of multiple sources to make reliable decisions about complex topics. Learners must enact thinking that reliably le...

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of the Learning Sciences Multiple-

CiteScore

10.70

自引率

5.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： Journal of the Learning Sciences (JLS) is one of the two official journals of the International Society of the Learning Sciences ( www.isls.org). JLS provides a multidisciplinary forum for research on education and learning that informs theories of how people learn and the design of learning environments. It publishes research that elucidates processes of learning, and the ways in which technologies, instructional practices, and learning environments can be designed to support learning in different contexts. JLS articles draw on theoretical frameworks from such diverse fields as cognitive science, sociocultural theory, educational psychology, computer science, and anthropology. Submissions are not limited to any particular research method, but must be based on rigorous analyses that present new insights into how people learn and/or how learning can be supported and enhanced. Successful submissions should position their argument within extant literature in the learning sciences. They should reflect the core practices and foci that have defined the learning sciences as a field: privileging design in methodology and pedagogy; emphasizing interdisciplinarity and methodological innovation; grounding research in real-world contexts; answering questions about learning process and mechanism, alongside outcomes; pursuing technological and pedagogical innovation; and maintaining a strong connection between research and practice.