数字化皮肤病理学的实施:多地点学术机构的经验。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Sydney L. Proffer MD, MS, Jacob Reinhart MD, Jennifer L. Ridgeway PhD, Barbara Barry PhD, Celia Kamath PhD, Erin Wissler Gerdes MA, Austin Todd MS, Derek J. Cervenka MS, David J. DiCaudo MD, Olayemi Sokumbi MD, Emma F. Johnson MD, Margot S. Peters MD, Carilyn N. Wieland MD, Nneka I. Comfere MD
{"title":"数字化皮肤病理学的实施:多地点学术机构的经验。","authors":"Sydney L. Proffer MD, MS,&nbsp;Jacob Reinhart MD,&nbsp;Jennifer L. Ridgeway PhD,&nbsp;Barbara Barry PhD,&nbsp;Celia Kamath PhD,&nbsp;Erin Wissler Gerdes MA,&nbsp;Austin Todd MS,&nbsp;Derek J. Cervenka MS,&nbsp;David J. DiCaudo MD,&nbsp;Olayemi Sokumbi MD,&nbsp;Emma F. Johnson MD,&nbsp;Margot S. Peters MD,&nbsp;Carilyn N. Wieland MD,&nbsp;Nneka I. Comfere MD","doi":"10.1111/cup.14629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Technology has revolutionized not only direct patient care but also diagnostic care processes. This study evaluates the transition from glass-slide microscopy to digital pathology (DP) at a multisite academic institution, using mixed methods to understand user perceptions of digitization and key productivity metrics of practice change.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Participants included dermatopathologists, pathology reporting specialists, and clinicians. Electronic surveys and individual or group interviews included questions related to technology comfort, trust in DP, and rationale for DP adoption. Case volumes and turnaround times were abstracted from the electronic health record from Qtr 4 2020 to Qtr 1 2023 (inclusive). Data were analyzed descriptively, while interviews were analyzed using methods of content analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Thirty-four staff completed surveys and 22 participated in an interview. Case volumes and diagnostic turnaround time did not differ across the institution during or after implementation timelines (<i>p</i> = 0.084; <i>p</i> = 0.133, respectively). 82.5% (28/34) of staff agreed that DP improved the sign-out experience, with accessibility, ergonomics, and annotation features described as key factors. Clinicians reported positive perspectives of DP impact on patient safety and interdisciplinary collaboration.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Our study demonstrates that DP has a high acceptance rate, does not adversely impact productivity, and may improve patient safety and care collaboration.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cutaneous Pathology","volume":"51 9","pages":"696-704"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digital dermatopathology implementation: Experience at a multisite academic institution\",\"authors\":\"Sydney L. Proffer MD, MS,&nbsp;Jacob Reinhart MD,&nbsp;Jennifer L. Ridgeway PhD,&nbsp;Barbara Barry PhD,&nbsp;Celia Kamath PhD,&nbsp;Erin Wissler Gerdes MA,&nbsp;Austin Todd MS,&nbsp;Derek J. Cervenka MS,&nbsp;David J. DiCaudo MD,&nbsp;Olayemi Sokumbi MD,&nbsp;Emma F. Johnson MD,&nbsp;Margot S. Peters MD,&nbsp;Carilyn N. Wieland MD,&nbsp;Nneka I. Comfere MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cup.14629\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Technology has revolutionized not only direct patient care but also diagnostic care processes. This study evaluates the transition from glass-slide microscopy to digital pathology (DP) at a multisite academic institution, using mixed methods to understand user perceptions of digitization and key productivity metrics of practice change.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Participants included dermatopathologists, pathology reporting specialists, and clinicians. Electronic surveys and individual or group interviews included questions related to technology comfort, trust in DP, and rationale for DP adoption. Case volumes and turnaround times were abstracted from the electronic health record from Qtr 4 2020 to Qtr 1 2023 (inclusive). Data were analyzed descriptively, while interviews were analyzed using methods of content analysis.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Thirty-four staff completed surveys and 22 participated in an interview. Case volumes and diagnostic turnaround time did not differ across the institution during or after implementation timelines (<i>p</i> = 0.084; <i>p</i> = 0.133, respectively). 82.5% (28/34) of staff agreed that DP improved the sign-out experience, with accessibility, ergonomics, and annotation features described as key factors. Clinicians reported positive perspectives of DP impact on patient safety and interdisciplinary collaboration.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Our study demonstrates that DP has a high acceptance rate, does not adversely impact productivity, and may improve patient safety and care collaboration.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15407,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cutaneous Pathology\",\"volume\":\"51 9\",\"pages\":\"696-704\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cutaneous Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cup.14629\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cutaneous Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cup.14629","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:技术不仅彻底改变了对患者的直接护理,也彻底改变了诊断护理流程。本研究评估了一家多地点学术机构从玻璃滑动显微镜到数字病理学(DP)的过渡情况,采用混合方法了解用户对数字化的看法以及实践变革的关键生产力指标:参与者包括皮肤病理学家、病理报告专家和临床医生。电子调查和个人或小组访谈包括与技术舒适度、对 DP 的信任度以及采用 DP 的理由相关的问题。病例量和周转时间是从 2020 年第 4 季度至 2023 年第 1 季度(含)的电子病历中提取的。数据采用描述性分析方法,访谈则采用内容分析方法:34 名员工完成了调查,22 名员工参加了访谈。在实施期间和之后,各机构的病例量和诊断周转时间没有差异(分别为 p = 0.084 和 p = 0.133)。82.5%(28/34)的员工认为 DP 改善了签出体验,而可访问性、人体工程学和注释功能被认为是关键因素。临床医生积极评价了 DP 对患者安全和跨学科合作的影响:我们的研究表明,DP 的接受率很高,不会对工作效率产生负面影响,还能改善患者安全和护理协作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Digital dermatopathology implementation: Experience at a multisite academic institution

Background

Technology has revolutionized not only direct patient care but also diagnostic care processes. This study evaluates the transition from glass-slide microscopy to digital pathology (DP) at a multisite academic institution, using mixed methods to understand user perceptions of digitization and key productivity metrics of practice change.

Methods

Participants included dermatopathologists, pathology reporting specialists, and clinicians. Electronic surveys and individual or group interviews included questions related to technology comfort, trust in DP, and rationale for DP adoption. Case volumes and turnaround times were abstracted from the electronic health record from Qtr 4 2020 to Qtr 1 2023 (inclusive). Data were analyzed descriptively, while interviews were analyzed using methods of content analysis.

Results

Thirty-four staff completed surveys and 22 participated in an interview. Case volumes and diagnostic turnaround time did not differ across the institution during or after implementation timelines (p = 0.084; p = 0.133, respectively). 82.5% (28/34) of staff agreed that DP improved the sign-out experience, with accessibility, ergonomics, and annotation features described as key factors. Clinicians reported positive perspectives of DP impact on patient safety and interdisciplinary collaboration.

Conclusions

Our study demonstrates that DP has a high acceptance rate, does not adversely impact productivity, and may improve patient safety and care collaboration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
174
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cutaneous Pathology publishes manuscripts broadly relevant to diseases of the skin and mucosae, with the aims of advancing scientific knowledge regarding dermatopathology and enhancing the communication between clinical practitioners and research scientists. Original scientific manuscripts on diagnostic and experimental cutaneous pathology are especially desirable. Timely, pertinent review articles also will be given high priority. Manuscripts based on light, fluorescence, and electron microscopy, histochemistry, immunology, molecular biology, and genetics, as well as allied sciences, are all welcome, provided their principal focus is on cutaneous pathology. Publication time will be kept as short as possible, ensuring that articles will be quickly available to all interested in this speciality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信