探索治疗斑秃的 Janus 激酶抑制剂:综述。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Randa Bushwereb, Gautam Srivastava
{"title":"探索治疗斑秃的 Janus 激酶抑制剂:综述。","authors":"Randa Bushwereb, Gautam Srivastava","doi":"10.23736/S2784-8671.24.07894-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Alopecia areata poses a significant challenge due to its chronic autoimmune nature, leading to psychosocial impacts. Recent strides in understanding the disease have spotlighted Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors as potential therapies. This comprehensive review aims to assess Baricitinib's efficacy and safety in treating scalp, eyebrow, and eyelash alopecia areata, and compare the effectiveness of Ritlecitinib and Brepocitinib.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>Conducting a thorough electronic literature search, we focused on clinical studies of JAK inhibitors for moderate to severe alopecia areata from 2015 onward. Key databases, including MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Google Scholar, and Medscape, were utilized. Primary outcomes included changes in the Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score, with safety data evaluating adverse events and serious adverse events. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>Among the twelve studies identified, Baricitinib demonstrated superior efficacy over placebo at 24 weeks, with both 2mg and 4mg dosages significantly reducing SALT scores. Comparative efficacy at 24 weeks for Baricitinib, Brepocitinib, and Ritlecitinib showed similar effectiveness compared to placebo, with a marginal superiority observed for Baricitinib 4mg. All JAK inhibitors were well-tolerated, with reported adverse events primarily being mild and manageable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Collectively, the reviewed studies affirm JAK inhibitors, particularly Baricitinib, as promising treatments for moderate to severe alopecia areata. These inhibitors exhibit superior efficacy, as indicated by notable reductions in SALT scores, and are well-tolerated, with predominantly mild and manageable adverse events.</p>","PeriodicalId":14526,"journal":{"name":"Italian Journal of Dermatology and Venereology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring Janus kinase inhibitors for alopecia areata: a comprehensive review.\",\"authors\":\"Randa Bushwereb, Gautam Srivastava\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S2784-8671.24.07894-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Alopecia areata poses a significant challenge due to its chronic autoimmune nature, leading to psychosocial impacts. Recent strides in understanding the disease have spotlighted Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors as potential therapies. This comprehensive review aims to assess Baricitinib's efficacy and safety in treating scalp, eyebrow, and eyelash alopecia areata, and compare the effectiveness of Ritlecitinib and Brepocitinib.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>Conducting a thorough electronic literature search, we focused on clinical studies of JAK inhibitors for moderate to severe alopecia areata from 2015 onward. Key databases, including MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Google Scholar, and Medscape, were utilized. Primary outcomes included changes in the Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score, with safety data evaluating adverse events and serious adverse events. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>Among the twelve studies identified, Baricitinib demonstrated superior efficacy over placebo at 24 weeks, with both 2mg and 4mg dosages significantly reducing SALT scores. Comparative efficacy at 24 weeks for Baricitinib, Brepocitinib, and Ritlecitinib showed similar effectiveness compared to placebo, with a marginal superiority observed for Baricitinib 4mg. All JAK inhibitors were well-tolerated, with reported adverse events primarily being mild and manageable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Collectively, the reviewed studies affirm JAK inhibitors, particularly Baricitinib, as promising treatments for moderate to severe alopecia areata. These inhibitors exhibit superior efficacy, as indicated by notable reductions in SALT scores, and are well-tolerated, with predominantly mild and manageable adverse events.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14526,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Italian Journal of Dermatology and Venereology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Italian Journal of Dermatology and Venereology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2784-8671.24.07894-0\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Italian Journal of Dermatology and Venereology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2784-8671.24.07894-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介斑秃是一种慢性自身免疫性疾病,对患者的社会心理造成严重影响。最近,人们对这种疾病的认识取得了长足进步,并将Janus激酶(JAK)抑制剂作为潜在疗法。本综述旨在评估巴利昔尼治疗头皮、眉毛和睫毛脱发症的疗效和安全性,并比较瑞替西替尼和布雷博西替尼的疗效:通过全面的电子文献检索,我们重点关注了2015年以来JAK抑制剂治疗中度至重度斑秃的临床研究。主要数据库包括MEDLINE、PubMed、Cochrane Library、EMBASE、Google Scholar和Medscape。主要结果包括脱发严重程度工具(SALT)评分的变化,安全性数据评估不良事件和严重不良事件。证据综合采用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具评估偏倚风险:在确定的12项研究中,巴瑞替尼在24周时的疗效优于安慰剂,2毫克和4毫克剂量均可显著降低SALT评分。与安慰剂相比,巴利昔替尼、布雷博西替尼和瑞替西替尼在24周时的疗效比较显示相似,巴利昔替尼4毫克剂量的疗效略优于安慰剂。所有JAK抑制剂的耐受性都很好,报告的不良反应主要是轻微和可控的:综上所述,这些研究肯定了JAK抑制剂,尤其是巴利昔尼,是治疗中度至重度斑秃的有前途的药物。这些抑制剂疗效显著,SALT评分明显降低,而且耐受性良好,主要不良反应轻微且可控。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring Janus kinase inhibitors for alopecia areata: a comprehensive review.

Introduction: Alopecia areata poses a significant challenge due to its chronic autoimmune nature, leading to psychosocial impacts. Recent strides in understanding the disease have spotlighted Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors as potential therapies. This comprehensive review aims to assess Baricitinib's efficacy and safety in treating scalp, eyebrow, and eyelash alopecia areata, and compare the effectiveness of Ritlecitinib and Brepocitinib.

Evidence acquisition: Conducting a thorough electronic literature search, we focused on clinical studies of JAK inhibitors for moderate to severe alopecia areata from 2015 onward. Key databases, including MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Google Scholar, and Medscape, were utilized. Primary outcomes included changes in the Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score, with safety data evaluating adverse events and serious adverse events. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool.

Evidence synthesis: Among the twelve studies identified, Baricitinib demonstrated superior efficacy over placebo at 24 weeks, with both 2mg and 4mg dosages significantly reducing SALT scores. Comparative efficacy at 24 weeks for Baricitinib, Brepocitinib, and Ritlecitinib showed similar effectiveness compared to placebo, with a marginal superiority observed for Baricitinib 4mg. All JAK inhibitors were well-tolerated, with reported adverse events primarily being mild and manageable.

Conclusions: Collectively, the reviewed studies affirm JAK inhibitors, particularly Baricitinib, as promising treatments for moderate to severe alopecia areata. These inhibitors exhibit superior efficacy, as indicated by notable reductions in SALT scores, and are well-tolerated, with predominantly mild and manageable adverse events.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
442
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信