iVOMS:健康对照组和轻度脑外伤患者的仪器前庭/眼球运动筛查

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Lisa Graham , Dylan Powell , Kody R. Campbell , Rosie Morris , Rodrigo Vitorio , Lucy Parrington , Prokopios Antonellis , Alan Godfrey , Laurie A. King , Samuel Stuart
{"title":"iVOMS:健康对照组和轻度脑外伤患者的仪器前庭/眼球运动筛查","authors":"Lisa Graham ,&nbsp;Dylan Powell ,&nbsp;Kody R. Campbell ,&nbsp;Rosie Morris ,&nbsp;Rodrigo Vitorio ,&nbsp;Lucy Parrington ,&nbsp;Prokopios Antonellis ,&nbsp;Alan Godfrey ,&nbsp;Laurie A. King ,&nbsp;Samuel Stuart","doi":"10.1016/j.medengphy.2024.104180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><strong>Objective</strong> Vestibular/ocular deficits occur with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). The vestibular/ocular motor screening (VOMS) tool is used to assess individuals post-mTBI, which primarily relies upon subjective self-reported symptoms. Instrumenting the VOMS (iVOMS) with technology may allow for more objective assessment post-mTBI, which reflects actual task performance. This study aimed to validate the iVOMS analytically and clinically in mTBI and controls.</p><p><strong>Methods</strong> Seventy-nine people with sub-acute mTBI (&lt;12 weeks post-injury) and forty-four healthy control participants performed the VOMS whilst wearing a mobile eye-tracking on a one-off visit. People with mTBI were included if they were within 12 weeks of a physician diagnosis. Participants were excluded if they had any musculoskeletal, neurological or sensory deficits which could explain dysfunction. A series of custom-made eye tracking algorithms were used to assess recorded eye-movements.</p><p><strong>Results</strong> The iVOMS was analytically valid compared to the reference (ICC<sub>2,1</sub> 0.85–0.99) in mTBI and controls. The iVOMS outcomes were clinically valid as there were significant differences between groups for convergence, vertical saccades, smooth pursuit, vestibular ocular reflex and visual motion sensitivity outcomes. However, there was no significant relationship between iVOMS outcomes and self-reported symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusion</strong> The iVOMS is analytically and clinically valid in mTBI and controls, but further work is required to examine the sensitivity of iVOMS outcomes across the mTBI spectrum. Findings also highlighted that symptom and physiological issue resolution post-mTBI may not coincide and relationships need further examination.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49836,"journal":{"name":"Medical Engineering & Physics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S135045332400081X/pdfft?md5=ade93e2e6a5eb860941cd46c827ed723&pid=1-s2.0-S135045332400081X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"iVOMS: Instrumented Vestibular / Ocular motor screen in healthy controls and mild traumatic brain injury\",\"authors\":\"Lisa Graham ,&nbsp;Dylan Powell ,&nbsp;Kody R. Campbell ,&nbsp;Rosie Morris ,&nbsp;Rodrigo Vitorio ,&nbsp;Lucy Parrington ,&nbsp;Prokopios Antonellis ,&nbsp;Alan Godfrey ,&nbsp;Laurie A. King ,&nbsp;Samuel Stuart\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.medengphy.2024.104180\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><strong>Objective</strong> Vestibular/ocular deficits occur with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). The vestibular/ocular motor screening (VOMS) tool is used to assess individuals post-mTBI, which primarily relies upon subjective self-reported symptoms. Instrumenting the VOMS (iVOMS) with technology may allow for more objective assessment post-mTBI, which reflects actual task performance. This study aimed to validate the iVOMS analytically and clinically in mTBI and controls.</p><p><strong>Methods</strong> Seventy-nine people with sub-acute mTBI (&lt;12 weeks post-injury) and forty-four healthy control participants performed the VOMS whilst wearing a mobile eye-tracking on a one-off visit. People with mTBI were included if they were within 12 weeks of a physician diagnosis. Participants were excluded if they had any musculoskeletal, neurological or sensory deficits which could explain dysfunction. A series of custom-made eye tracking algorithms were used to assess recorded eye-movements.</p><p><strong>Results</strong> The iVOMS was analytically valid compared to the reference (ICC<sub>2,1</sub> 0.85–0.99) in mTBI and controls. The iVOMS outcomes were clinically valid as there were significant differences between groups for convergence, vertical saccades, smooth pursuit, vestibular ocular reflex and visual motion sensitivity outcomes. However, there was no significant relationship between iVOMS outcomes and self-reported symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusion</strong> The iVOMS is analytically and clinically valid in mTBI and controls, but further work is required to examine the sensitivity of iVOMS outcomes across the mTBI spectrum. Findings also highlighted that symptom and physiological issue resolution post-mTBI may not coincide and relationships need further examination.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49836,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Engineering & Physics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S135045332400081X/pdfft?md5=ade93e2e6a5eb860941cd46c827ed723&pid=1-s2.0-S135045332400081X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Engineering & Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S135045332400081X\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Engineering & Physics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S135045332400081X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

轻度脑外伤(mTBI)会导致前庭/眼部功能障碍。前庭/眼部运动筛查(VOMS)工具用于评估轻度脑损伤后的患者,主要依赖于主观的自我症状报告。利用技术对前庭/眼球运动筛查工具(iVOMS)进行工具化,可以对创伤后前庭/眼球运动进行更客观的评估,从而反映实际的任务表现。本研究旨在对 iVOMS 在 mTBI 和对照组中的分析和临床表现进行验证。经医生诊断后12周内患有创伤性脑损伤的人被纳入调查范围。如果参与者存在任何可能导致功能障碍的肌肉骨骼、神经或感觉缺陷,则不包括在内。结果 iVOMS对mTBI和对照组的分析结果与参考值相比是有效的(ICC2,1为0.85-0.99)。iVOMS 的结果在临床上是有效的,因为各组之间在辐辏、垂直囊视、平滑追逐、前庭眼反射和视觉运动敏感度结果上存在显著差异。结论 iVOMS 在 mTBI 和对照组中具有分析和临床有效性,但还需要进一步研究 iVOMS 结果对不同 mTBI 的敏感性。研究结果还强调,mTBI后症状和生理问题的解决可能并不一致,两者之间的关系需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
iVOMS: Instrumented Vestibular / Ocular motor screen in healthy controls and mild traumatic brain injury

Objective Vestibular/ocular deficits occur with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). The vestibular/ocular motor screening (VOMS) tool is used to assess individuals post-mTBI, which primarily relies upon subjective self-reported symptoms. Instrumenting the VOMS (iVOMS) with technology may allow for more objective assessment post-mTBI, which reflects actual task performance. This study aimed to validate the iVOMS analytically and clinically in mTBI and controls.

Methods Seventy-nine people with sub-acute mTBI (<12 weeks post-injury) and forty-four healthy control participants performed the VOMS whilst wearing a mobile eye-tracking on a one-off visit. People with mTBI were included if they were within 12 weeks of a physician diagnosis. Participants were excluded if they had any musculoskeletal, neurological or sensory deficits which could explain dysfunction. A series of custom-made eye tracking algorithms were used to assess recorded eye-movements.

Results The iVOMS was analytically valid compared to the reference (ICC2,1 0.85–0.99) in mTBI and controls. The iVOMS outcomes were clinically valid as there were significant differences between groups for convergence, vertical saccades, smooth pursuit, vestibular ocular reflex and visual motion sensitivity outcomes. However, there was no significant relationship between iVOMS outcomes and self-reported symptoms.

Conclusion The iVOMS is analytically and clinically valid in mTBI and controls, but further work is required to examine the sensitivity of iVOMS outcomes across the mTBI spectrum. Findings also highlighted that symptom and physiological issue resolution post-mTBI may not coincide and relationships need further examination.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Engineering & Physics
Medical Engineering & Physics 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.50%
发文量
172
审稿时长
3.0 months
期刊介绍: Medical Engineering & Physics provides a forum for the publication of the latest developments in biomedical engineering, and reflects the essential multidisciplinary nature of the subject. The journal publishes in-depth critical reviews, scientific papers and technical notes. Our focus encompasses the application of the basic principles of physics and engineering to the development of medical devices and technology, with the ultimate aim of producing improvements in the quality of health care.Topics covered include biomechanics, biomaterials, mechanobiology, rehabilitation engineering, biomedical signal processing and medical device development. Medical Engineering & Physics aims to keep both engineers and clinicians abreast of the latest applications of technology to health care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信