通过单类分类和离群点检测发现食用油掺假问题

IF 7.4 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Food frontiers Pub Date : 2024-05-15 DOI:10.1002/fft2.395
Xinjing Dou, Fengqin Tu, Li Yu, Yong Yang, Fei Ma, Xuefang Wang, Du Wang, Liangxiao Zhang, Xiaoming Jiang, Peiwu Li
{"title":"通过单类分类和离群点检测发现食用油掺假问题","authors":"Xinjing Dou,&nbsp;Fengqin Tu,&nbsp;Li Yu,&nbsp;Yong Yang,&nbsp;Fei Ma,&nbsp;Xuefang Wang,&nbsp;Du Wang,&nbsp;Liangxiao Zhang,&nbsp;Xiaoming Jiang,&nbsp;Peiwu Li","doi":"10.1002/fft2.395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Edible oil adulteration is a mostly practiced phenomenon. However, the traditional discriminant methods fail to detect oil adulteration involving more than one adulterant. Recently, one-class classifiers were built for food or oil authentication. Unfortunately, as it is hard to determine the application domain of the one-class classifier, high prediction error was obtained for real samples in market surveillance. In this study, a new method was developed based on one-class classification and outlier detection for edible oil adulteration detection in market surveillance. The model population was constructed using Monte Carlo sampling of unidentified inspected samples to select the plateau region exhibiting the highest accumulated absolute centered residual (ACR) values. Subsequently, the number of models in the plateau region was validated by the theoretical ones calculated by the classical probability model. The models in the plateau region with the highest cumulative accumulated ACR values were used to identify adulterated oils. Furthermore, the cross-validation was conducted by comparing identification results from two different Monte Carlo sampling ratios to ensure the accuracy of our method. Both single adulteration and multiple adulteration of peanut oils were prepared to validate our method. Moreover, this method was used to detect adulteration of sesame oils, which have already been identified by the markers in our previous study. The validation results of three datasets indicated that this method could effectively identify adulterated samples and therefore provide a novel solution for inspecting potential adulteration in practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":73042,"journal":{"name":"Food frontiers","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fft2.395","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adulteration detection of edible oil by one-class classification and outlier detection\",\"authors\":\"Xinjing Dou,&nbsp;Fengqin Tu,&nbsp;Li Yu,&nbsp;Yong Yang,&nbsp;Fei Ma,&nbsp;Xuefang Wang,&nbsp;Du Wang,&nbsp;Liangxiao Zhang,&nbsp;Xiaoming Jiang,&nbsp;Peiwu Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/fft2.395\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Edible oil adulteration is a mostly practiced phenomenon. However, the traditional discriminant methods fail to detect oil adulteration involving more than one adulterant. Recently, one-class classifiers were built for food or oil authentication. Unfortunately, as it is hard to determine the application domain of the one-class classifier, high prediction error was obtained for real samples in market surveillance. In this study, a new method was developed based on one-class classification and outlier detection for edible oil adulteration detection in market surveillance. The model population was constructed using Monte Carlo sampling of unidentified inspected samples to select the plateau region exhibiting the highest accumulated absolute centered residual (ACR) values. Subsequently, the number of models in the plateau region was validated by the theoretical ones calculated by the classical probability model. The models in the plateau region with the highest cumulative accumulated ACR values were used to identify adulterated oils. Furthermore, the cross-validation was conducted by comparing identification results from two different Monte Carlo sampling ratios to ensure the accuracy of our method. Both single adulteration and multiple adulteration of peanut oils were prepared to validate our method. Moreover, this method was used to detect adulteration of sesame oils, which have already been identified by the markers in our previous study. The validation results of three datasets indicated that this method could effectively identify adulterated samples and therefore provide a novel solution for inspecting potential adulteration in practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73042,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food frontiers\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fft2.395\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food frontiers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fft2.395\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food frontiers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fft2.395","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

食用油掺假是一种常见现象。然而,传统的判别方法无法检测出涉及一种以上掺假物的掺假油。最近,人们建立了用于食品或油品鉴别的单类分类器。遗憾的是,由于很难确定单类分类器的应用领域,因此在市场监管的实际样本中会出现较高的预测误差。本研究开发了一种基于单类分类和离群点检测的新方法,用于市场监管中的食用油掺假检测。通过对未识别的检测样品进行蒙特卡洛抽样,选择累计绝对居中残差(ACR)值最高的高原区域,构建模型群体。随后,用经典概率模型计算出的理论模型验证了高原区的模型数量。高原区中累积 ACR 值最高的模型被用来识别掺假油。此外,还通过比较两种不同蒙特卡洛抽样比例的鉴定结果进行了交叉验证,以确保我们方法的准确性。为了验证我们的方法,我们制备了单一掺假和多重掺假的花生油。此外,我们还用这种方法检测了芝麻油的掺假情况,我们在之前的研究中已经用标记物鉴别了芝麻油的掺假情况。三个数据集的验证结果表明,该方法能有效识别掺假样品,因此为实际检测潜在掺假提供了一种新的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Adulteration detection of edible oil by one-class classification and outlier detection

Adulteration detection of edible oil by one-class classification and outlier detection

Edible oil adulteration is a mostly practiced phenomenon. However, the traditional discriminant methods fail to detect oil adulteration involving more than one adulterant. Recently, one-class classifiers were built for food or oil authentication. Unfortunately, as it is hard to determine the application domain of the one-class classifier, high prediction error was obtained for real samples in market surveillance. In this study, a new method was developed based on one-class classification and outlier detection for edible oil adulteration detection in market surveillance. The model population was constructed using Monte Carlo sampling of unidentified inspected samples to select the plateau region exhibiting the highest accumulated absolute centered residual (ACR) values. Subsequently, the number of models in the plateau region was validated by the theoretical ones calculated by the classical probability model. The models in the plateau region with the highest cumulative accumulated ACR values were used to identify adulterated oils. Furthermore, the cross-validation was conducted by comparing identification results from two different Monte Carlo sampling ratios to ensure the accuracy of our method. Both single adulteration and multiple adulteration of peanut oils were prepared to validate our method. Moreover, this method was used to detect adulteration of sesame oils, which have already been identified by the markers in our previous study. The validation results of three datasets indicated that this method could effectively identify adulterated samples and therefore provide a novel solution for inspecting potential adulteration in practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信