Carlos A. de Matos Fernandes , Marion Hoffman , Jasperina Brouwer
{"title":"高校学生团队组建的前因","authors":"Carlos A. de Matos Fernandes , Marion Hoffman , Jasperina Brouwer","doi":"10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101931","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Students often form project teams by themselves rather than impose pre-defined teams because it leads to better study outcomes. However, few scholars have investigated the mechanisms driving the formation of self-organized groups.</p></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><p>We examine three underlying and interrelated antecedents of project team formation: friendships, familiarity with fellow team members due to prior co-working experiences, and similarity of team members regarding gender, academic achievement, and preferred collaborators.</p></div><div><h3>Sample</h3><p>The data encompasses 70 first-year university students asked to self-form teams to carry out a semester project.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We utilize Exponential Random Partition Models. This new method allows us to model how friendships, familiarity, and similarity affect self-organized group compositions while accounting for each factor's relative importance.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The results show that friends are more likely to end up in the same team than non-friends. Similarity is also an important antecedent for team formation: Students with the same gender and similar grades are more likely to end up in the same team. Familiarity and preferred collaboration showed negligible effects.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our findings emphasize that educators must consider academic and non-academic factors when allowing students to self-organize in teams, depending on what goal educators strive to achieve with team projects.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48357,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Instruction","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475224000586/pdfft?md5=a51a2e576643b9199128a7283170da16&pid=1-s2.0-S0959475224000586-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antecedents of student team formation in higher education\",\"authors\":\"Carlos A. de Matos Fernandes , Marion Hoffman , Jasperina Brouwer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101931\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Students often form project teams by themselves rather than impose pre-defined teams because it leads to better study outcomes. However, few scholars have investigated the mechanisms driving the formation of self-organized groups.</p></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><p>We examine three underlying and interrelated antecedents of project team formation: friendships, familiarity with fellow team members due to prior co-working experiences, and similarity of team members regarding gender, academic achievement, and preferred collaborators.</p></div><div><h3>Sample</h3><p>The data encompasses 70 first-year university students asked to self-form teams to carry out a semester project.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We utilize Exponential Random Partition Models. This new method allows us to model how friendships, familiarity, and similarity affect self-organized group compositions while accounting for each factor's relative importance.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The results show that friends are more likely to end up in the same team than non-friends. Similarity is also an important antecedent for team formation: Students with the same gender and similar grades are more likely to end up in the same team. Familiarity and preferred collaboration showed negligible effects.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our findings emphasize that educators must consider academic and non-academic factors when allowing students to self-organize in teams, depending on what goal educators strive to achieve with team projects.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learning and Instruction\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475224000586/pdfft?md5=a51a2e576643b9199128a7283170da16&pid=1-s2.0-S0959475224000586-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learning and Instruction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475224000586\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475224000586","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景学生通常会自己组建项目团队,而不是强加给预先确定的团队,因为这样能取得更好的学习效果。AimsWe examine three underlying and interrelated antecedencies of project team formation: friendships, familiarity with fellow team members due to prior co-working experiences, and similarity of team members regarding gender, academic achievement, and preferred collaborators.SampleThe data encompasses 70 first-year university students asked to self form teams to carry out a semester project.MethodsWe utilize Exponential Random Partition Models.结果结果表明,与非朋友相比,朋友更有可能加入同一个团队。相似性也是形成团队的重要先决条件:性别相同、成绩相近的学生更有可能加入同一个团队。我们的研究结果强调,教育者在允许学生自我组织团队时,必须考虑学术和非学术因素,这取决于教育者努力通过团队项目实现的目标。
Antecedents of student team formation in higher education
Background
Students often form project teams by themselves rather than impose pre-defined teams because it leads to better study outcomes. However, few scholars have investigated the mechanisms driving the formation of self-organized groups.
Aims
We examine three underlying and interrelated antecedents of project team formation: friendships, familiarity with fellow team members due to prior co-working experiences, and similarity of team members regarding gender, academic achievement, and preferred collaborators.
Sample
The data encompasses 70 first-year university students asked to self-form teams to carry out a semester project.
Methods
We utilize Exponential Random Partition Models. This new method allows us to model how friendships, familiarity, and similarity affect self-organized group compositions while accounting for each factor's relative importance.
Results
The results show that friends are more likely to end up in the same team than non-friends. Similarity is also an important antecedent for team formation: Students with the same gender and similar grades are more likely to end up in the same team. Familiarity and preferred collaboration showed negligible effects.
Conclusions
Our findings emphasize that educators must consider academic and non-academic factors when allowing students to self-organize in teams, depending on what goal educators strive to achieve with team projects.
期刊介绍:
As an international, multi-disciplinary, peer-refereed journal, Learning and Instruction provides a platform for the publication of the most advanced scientific research in the areas of learning, development, instruction and teaching. The journal welcomes original empirical investigations. The papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and different methodological approaches. They may refer to any age level, from infants to adults and to a diversity of learning and instructional settings, from laboratory experiments to field studies. The major criteria in the review and the selection process concern the significance of the contribution to the area of learning and instruction, and the rigor of the study.