Sheri Madigan, Audrey-Ann Deneault, Robbie Duschinsky, Marian J Bakermans-Kranenburg, Carlo Schuengel, Marinus H van IJzendoorn, Anh Ly, R M Pasco Fearon, Rachel Eirich, Marije L Verhage
{"title":"母亲和父亲的敏感性:通过荟萃分析研究儿童依恋安全的关键决定因素。","authors":"Sheri Madigan, Audrey-Ann Deneault, Robbie Duschinsky, Marian J Bakermans-Kranenburg, Carlo Schuengel, Marinus H van IJzendoorn, Anh Ly, R M Pasco Fearon, Rachel Eirich, Marije L Verhage","doi":"10.1037/bul0000433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sensitive caregiving behavior, which involves the ability to notice, interpret, and quickly respond to a child's signals of need and/or interest, is a central determinant of secure child-caregiver attachment. Yet, significant heterogeneity in effect sizes exists across the literature, and sources of heterogeneity have yet to be explained. For all child-caregiver dyads, there was a significant and positive pooled association between caregiver sensitivity and parent-child attachment (<i>r</i> = .25, 95% CI [.22, .28], <i>k</i> = 174, 230 effect sizes, <i>N</i> = 22,914). We also found a positive association between maternal sensitivity and child attachment security (<i>r</i> = .26, 95% CI [.22, .29], <i>k</i> = 159, 202 effect sizes, <i>N</i> = 21,483), which was equivalent in magnitude to paternal sensitivity and child attachment security (<i>r</i> = .21, 95% CI [.14, 27], <i>k</i> = 22, 23 effect sizes, <i>N</i> = 1,626). Maternal sensitivity was also negatively associated with all three classifications of insecure attachment (avoidant: <i>k</i> = 43, <i>r</i> = -.24 [-.34, -.13]; resistant: <i>k</i> = 43, <i>r</i> = -.12 [-.19, -.06]; disorganized: <i>k</i> = 24, <i>r</i> = -.19 [-.27, -.11]). For maternal sensitivity, associations were larger in studies that used the Attachment Q-Sort (vs. the Strange Situation), used the Maternal Behavior Q-Sort (vs. Ainsworth or Emotional Availability Scales), had strong (vs. poor) interrater measurement reliability, had a longer observation of sensitivity, and had less time elapse between assessments. For paternal sensitivity, associations were larger in older (vs. younger) fathers and children. These findings confirm the importance of both maternal and paternal sensitivity for the development of child attachment security and add understanding of the methodological and substantive factors that allow this effect to be observed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":17,"journal":{"name":"ACS Infectious Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Maternal and paternal sensitivity: Key determinants of child attachment security examined through meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Sheri Madigan, Audrey-Ann Deneault, Robbie Duschinsky, Marian J Bakermans-Kranenburg, Carlo Schuengel, Marinus H van IJzendoorn, Anh Ly, R M Pasco Fearon, Rachel Eirich, Marije L Verhage\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/bul0000433\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Sensitive caregiving behavior, which involves the ability to notice, interpret, and quickly respond to a child's signals of need and/or interest, is a central determinant of secure child-caregiver attachment. Yet, significant heterogeneity in effect sizes exists across the literature, and sources of heterogeneity have yet to be explained. For all child-caregiver dyads, there was a significant and positive pooled association between caregiver sensitivity and parent-child attachment (<i>r</i> = .25, 95% CI [.22, .28], <i>k</i> = 174, 230 effect sizes, <i>N</i> = 22,914). We also found a positive association between maternal sensitivity and child attachment security (<i>r</i> = .26, 95% CI [.22, .29], <i>k</i> = 159, 202 effect sizes, <i>N</i> = 21,483), which was equivalent in magnitude to paternal sensitivity and child attachment security (<i>r</i> = .21, 95% CI [.14, 27], <i>k</i> = 22, 23 effect sizes, <i>N</i> = 1,626). Maternal sensitivity was also negatively associated with all three classifications of insecure attachment (avoidant: <i>k</i> = 43, <i>r</i> = -.24 [-.34, -.13]; resistant: <i>k</i> = 43, <i>r</i> = -.12 [-.19, -.06]; disorganized: <i>k</i> = 24, <i>r</i> = -.19 [-.27, -.11]). For maternal sensitivity, associations were larger in studies that used the Attachment Q-Sort (vs. the Strange Situation), used the Maternal Behavior Q-Sort (vs. Ainsworth or Emotional Availability Scales), had strong (vs. poor) interrater measurement reliability, had a longer observation of sensitivity, and had less time elapse between assessments. For paternal sensitivity, associations were larger in older (vs. younger) fathers and children. These findings confirm the importance of both maternal and paternal sensitivity for the development of child attachment security and add understanding of the methodological and substantive factors that allow this effect to be observed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Infectious Diseases\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Infectious Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000433\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000433","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Maternal and paternal sensitivity: Key determinants of child attachment security examined through meta-analysis.
Sensitive caregiving behavior, which involves the ability to notice, interpret, and quickly respond to a child's signals of need and/or interest, is a central determinant of secure child-caregiver attachment. Yet, significant heterogeneity in effect sizes exists across the literature, and sources of heterogeneity have yet to be explained. For all child-caregiver dyads, there was a significant and positive pooled association between caregiver sensitivity and parent-child attachment (r = .25, 95% CI [.22, .28], k = 174, 230 effect sizes, N = 22,914). We also found a positive association between maternal sensitivity and child attachment security (r = .26, 95% CI [.22, .29], k = 159, 202 effect sizes, N = 21,483), which was equivalent in magnitude to paternal sensitivity and child attachment security (r = .21, 95% CI [.14, 27], k = 22, 23 effect sizes, N = 1,626). Maternal sensitivity was also negatively associated with all three classifications of insecure attachment (avoidant: k = 43, r = -.24 [-.34, -.13]; resistant: k = 43, r = -.12 [-.19, -.06]; disorganized: k = 24, r = -.19 [-.27, -.11]). For maternal sensitivity, associations were larger in studies that used the Attachment Q-Sort (vs. the Strange Situation), used the Maternal Behavior Q-Sort (vs. Ainsworth or Emotional Availability Scales), had strong (vs. poor) interrater measurement reliability, had a longer observation of sensitivity, and had less time elapse between assessments. For paternal sensitivity, associations were larger in older (vs. younger) fathers and children. These findings confirm the importance of both maternal and paternal sensitivity for the development of child attachment security and add understanding of the methodological and substantive factors that allow this effect to be observed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍:
ACS Infectious Diseases will be the first journal to highlight chemistry and its role in this multidisciplinary and collaborative research area. The journal will cover a diverse array of topics including, but not limited to:
* Discovery and development of new antimicrobial agents — identified through target- or phenotypic-based approaches as well as compounds that induce synergy with antimicrobials.
* Characterization and validation of drug target or pathways — use of single target and genome-wide knockdown and knockouts, biochemical studies, structural biology, new technologies to facilitate characterization and prioritization of potential drug targets.
* Mechanism of drug resistance — fundamental research that advances our understanding of resistance; strategies to prevent resistance.
* Mechanisms of action — use of genetic, metabolomic, and activity- and affinity-based protein profiling to elucidate the mechanism of action of clinical and experimental antimicrobial agents.
* Host-pathogen interactions — tools for studying host-pathogen interactions, cellular biochemistry of hosts and pathogens, and molecular interactions of pathogens with host microbiota.
* Small molecule vaccine adjuvants for infectious disease.
* Viral and bacterial biochemistry and molecular biology.