超越学术:瑞典学校教学实践与学生成绩和心理健康投诉之间的联系

IF 4.7 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Cristian Bortes , Joanna Giota
{"title":"超越学术:瑞典学校教学实践与学生成绩和心理健康投诉之间的联系","authors":"Cristian Bortes ,&nbsp;Joanna Giota","doi":"10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101937","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Despite extensive research on the relationship between teaching practices and learning outcomes, limited attention has been given to their potential links with students’ mental health.</p></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><p>This study investigates the relationships between three teaching practice types – teacher-centered, student-centered, and student-dominated – and both student mental health complaints and academic achievement. It furthers explores variations in these associations based on students’ socioeconomic status (SES).</p></div><div><h3>Sample</h3><p>The analysis includes 4573 grade 9 students (aged 15–16 years) in the Swedish comprehensive school system.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Employing structural equation modelling techniques, we analyze a dataset comprising students’ cognitive test scores, their perceptions of classroom processes, self-reported mental health complaints, as well as register data on teacher-assigned grades and parental education.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Teacher-centered practices are positively associated with academic achievements but lack robust links with mental health complaints. Conversely, student-centered practices are positively associated with academic achievements and correlate with lower mental health complaint frequencies. However, student-dominated practices demonstrate poor relationships with both mental health and academic achievements. Limited variations based on students’ social background reveal only two differing associations between low and high SES students: teacher-centered teaching shows stronger academic achievement associations for low SES students, while student-dominated teaching is more adversely linked to low SES students' mental health.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The results affirm the benefits of both teacher- and student-centered teaching practices for academic achievement while cautioning against excessive self-directed teaching. Importantly, the study highlights the role of instructional approaches in shaping not only academic outcomes but also students’ mental health.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48357,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Instruction","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475224000641/pdfft?md5=339999bc7bc28925589f749c58d64352&pid=1-s2.0-S0959475224000641-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond academics: Links from teaching practices in Swedish schools to students’ achievements and mental health complaints\",\"authors\":\"Cristian Bortes ,&nbsp;Joanna Giota\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101937\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Despite extensive research on the relationship between teaching practices and learning outcomes, limited attention has been given to their potential links with students’ mental health.</p></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><p>This study investigates the relationships between three teaching practice types – teacher-centered, student-centered, and student-dominated – and both student mental health complaints and academic achievement. It furthers explores variations in these associations based on students’ socioeconomic status (SES).</p></div><div><h3>Sample</h3><p>The analysis includes 4573 grade 9 students (aged 15–16 years) in the Swedish comprehensive school system.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Employing structural equation modelling techniques, we analyze a dataset comprising students’ cognitive test scores, their perceptions of classroom processes, self-reported mental health complaints, as well as register data on teacher-assigned grades and parental education.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Teacher-centered practices are positively associated with academic achievements but lack robust links with mental health complaints. Conversely, student-centered practices are positively associated with academic achievements and correlate with lower mental health complaint frequencies. However, student-dominated practices demonstrate poor relationships with both mental health and academic achievements. Limited variations based on students’ social background reveal only two differing associations between low and high SES students: teacher-centered teaching shows stronger academic achievement associations for low SES students, while student-dominated teaching is more adversely linked to low SES students' mental health.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The results affirm the benefits of both teacher- and student-centered teaching practices for academic achievement while cautioning against excessive self-directed teaching. Importantly, the study highlights the role of instructional approaches in shaping not only academic outcomes but also students’ mental health.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learning and Instruction\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475224000641/pdfft?md5=339999bc7bc28925589f749c58d64352&pid=1-s2.0-S0959475224000641-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learning and Instruction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475224000641\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475224000641","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景尽管对教学实践与学习成果之间的关系进行了广泛研究,但对教学实践与学生心理健康之间的潜在联系却关注有限。方法我们采用结构方程建模技术,分析了学生的认知测试成绩、他们对课堂教学过程的看法、自我报告的心理健康投诉,以及教师分配的年级和父母教育程度的登记数据。结果以教师为中心的教学实践与学业成绩呈正相关,但与心理健康投诉缺乏有力的联系。相反,以学生为中心的做法与学业成绩呈正相关,并与较低的心理健康投诉频率相关。然而,以学生为中心的教学方法与心理健康和学业成绩的关系都很差。基于学生社会背景的有限差异只显示出低社会经济地位学生和高社会经济地位学生之间存在两种不同的关联:以教师为中心的教学方法与低社会经济地位学生的学业成绩有更强的关联,而以学生为主导的教学方法与低社会经济地位学生的心理健康有更不利的关联。重要的是,这项研究强调了教学方法不仅对学习成绩,而且对学生心理健康的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Beyond academics: Links from teaching practices in Swedish schools to students’ achievements and mental health complaints

Background

Despite extensive research on the relationship between teaching practices and learning outcomes, limited attention has been given to their potential links with students’ mental health.

Aims

This study investigates the relationships between three teaching practice types – teacher-centered, student-centered, and student-dominated – and both student mental health complaints and academic achievement. It furthers explores variations in these associations based on students’ socioeconomic status (SES).

Sample

The analysis includes 4573 grade 9 students (aged 15–16 years) in the Swedish comprehensive school system.

Methods

Employing structural equation modelling techniques, we analyze a dataset comprising students’ cognitive test scores, their perceptions of classroom processes, self-reported mental health complaints, as well as register data on teacher-assigned grades and parental education.

Results

Teacher-centered practices are positively associated with academic achievements but lack robust links with mental health complaints. Conversely, student-centered practices are positively associated with academic achievements and correlate with lower mental health complaint frequencies. However, student-dominated practices demonstrate poor relationships with both mental health and academic achievements. Limited variations based on students’ social background reveal only two differing associations between low and high SES students: teacher-centered teaching shows stronger academic achievement associations for low SES students, while student-dominated teaching is more adversely linked to low SES students' mental health.

Conclusions

The results affirm the benefits of both teacher- and student-centered teaching practices for academic achievement while cautioning against excessive self-directed teaching. Importantly, the study highlights the role of instructional approaches in shaping not only academic outcomes but also students’ mental health.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: As an international, multi-disciplinary, peer-refereed journal, Learning and Instruction provides a platform for the publication of the most advanced scientific research in the areas of learning, development, instruction and teaching. The journal welcomes original empirical investigations. The papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and different methodological approaches. They may refer to any age level, from infants to adults and to a diversity of learning and instructional settings, from laboratory experiments to field studies. The major criteria in the review and the selection process concern the significance of the contribution to the area of learning and instruction, and the rigor of the study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信