根据临床标准验证 OCS-Plus：简要报告。

IF 2 4区心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY

Journal of Neuropsychology Pub Date : 2024-04-23 DOI:10.1111/jnp.12369

Rebecca Roberts, Reena Vohora, Sam S. Webb, Nele Demeyere

{"title":"根据临床标准验证 OCS-Plus：简要报告。","authors":"Rebecca Roberts, Reena Vohora, Sam S. Webb, Nele Demeyere","doi":"10.1111/jnp.12369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This research aimed to determine the sensitivity and clinical validity of the OCS-Plus, a stroke-specific tablet-based cognitive screening tool, in comparison with the MoCA, a routinely used screening tool, after stroke. Eighty-six patients were recruited from Oxfordshire stroke wards over a 22-month period and completed both screens. Overall, we found that the OCS-Plus has good convergent validity and excellent sensitivity when compared with the MoCA. The OCS-Plus is therefore of potential benefit to those seeking a sensitive screening tool.</p>","PeriodicalId":197,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuropsychology","volume":"18 3","pages":"452-458"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jnp.12369","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validating the OCS-Plus against a clinical standard: A brief report\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca Roberts, Reena Vohora, Sam S. Webb, Nele Demeyere\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jnp.12369\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This research aimed to determine the sensitivity and clinical validity of the OCS-Plus, a stroke-specific tablet-based cognitive screening tool, in comparison with the MoCA, a routinely used screening tool, after stroke. Eighty-six patients were recruited from Oxfordshire stroke wards over a 22-month period and completed both screens. Overall, we found that the OCS-Plus has good convergent validity and excellent sensitivity when compared with the MoCA. The OCS-Plus is therefore of potential benefit to those seeking a sensitive screening tool.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":197,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neuropsychology\",\"volume\":\"18 3\",\"pages\":\"452-458\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jnp.12369\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neuropsychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jnp.12369\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jnp.12369","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在确定中风后基于平板电脑的认知筛查工具 OCS-Plus 与常规筛查工具 MoCA 的灵敏度和临床有效性。在 22 个月的时间里，我们从牛津郡中风病房招募了 86 名患者，他们同时完成了两种筛查。总体而言，我们发现 OCS-Plus 与 MoCA 相比具有良好的收敛效度和出色的灵敏度。因此，OCS-Plus 对那些寻求敏感筛查工具的人来说具有潜在的益处。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

Validating the OCS-Plus against a clinical standard: A brief report

查看原文本刊更多论文

Validating the OCS-Plus against a clinical standard: A brief report

This research aimed to determine the sensitivity and clinical validity of the OCS-Plus, a stroke-specific tablet-based cognitive screening tool, in comparison with the MoCA, a routinely used screening tool, after stroke. Eighty-six patients were recruited from Oxfordshire stroke wards over a 22-month period and completed both screens. Overall, we found that the OCS-Plus has good convergent validity and excellent sensitivity when compared with the MoCA. The OCS-Plus is therefore of potential benefit to those seeking a sensitive screening tool.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Neuropsychology 医学-心理学

CiteScore

4.50

自引率

4.50%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： The Journal of Neuropsychology publishes original contributions to scientific knowledge in neuropsychology including: • clinical and research studies with neurological, psychiatric and psychological patient populations in all age groups • behavioural or pharmacological treatment regimes • cognitive experimentation and neuroimaging • multidisciplinary approach embracing areas such as developmental psychology, neurology, psychiatry, physiology, endocrinology, pharmacology and imaging science The following types of paper are invited: • papers reporting original empirical investigations • theoretical papers; provided that these are sufficiently related to empirical data • review articles, which need not be exhaustive, but which should give an interpretation of the state of research in a given field and, where appropriate, identify its clinical implications • brief reports and comments • case reports • fast-track papers (included in the issue following acceptation) reaction and rebuttals (short reactions to publications in JNP followed by an invited rebuttal of the original authors) • special issues.