校本正念计划(Paws b)对移情和亲社会行为的影响:随机对照试验

IF 3.1 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Katie Crompton, Daphne Kaklamanou, Alessandra Fasulo, Eszter Somogyi
{"title":"校本正念计划(Paws b)对移情和亲社会行为的影响:随机对照试验","authors":"Katie Crompton, Daphne Kaklamanou, Alessandra Fasulo, Eszter Somogyi","doi":"10.1007/s12671-024-02345-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Objectives</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of a school-based mindfulness programme (SBMP), “Paws b”, on empathy and prosocial behaviour among children aged 7 to 10 years in a school setting.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Method</h3><p>This multi-informant design, randomised controlled trial compared an intervention group to a wait-list control group, involving 133 children aged 7- to 10 years from 10 classrooms. Outcome measures were taken at pre-intervention, post-intervention, and 3-month follow-up and included self-reports of mindfulness and empathy, a sharing task, teacher and peer reports of prosocial behaviours, and sociometry measures.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Children in the intervention group were voted as significantly more (a) prosocial by teachers <i>F</i>(1, 127) = 7.35,<i> p</i> = 0.008,<i> η</i><sup><i>2</i></sup> = 0.055, (b) helpful by peers, <i>F</i>(1, 127) = 9.369, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.003, <i>η</i><sup><i>2</i></sup> = 0.069, (c) popular by peers, <i>F</i>(1, 127) = 4.90, <i>p</i> = 0.028, <i>η</i><sup><i>2</i></sup> = 0.037, and (d) showed more reciprocal relationships, <i>t</i>(8) = 2.518, <i>p</i> = 0.036, compared to the wait-list control group. The intervention did not have an effect on mindfulness scores, empathy scores (affective, cognitive, or intention to comfort), or sharing task scores.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>Findings suggest that, for 7–10-year-olds, the SBMP, Paws b, delivered by a mindfulness teacher, can increase some aspects of prosociality, as judged by peers and teachers, but has no effect on self-assessed empathy.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Preregistration</h3><p>This study was preregistered on the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/vm6tp/) on 31.10.2022.</p>","PeriodicalId":18523,"journal":{"name":"Mindfulness","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effects of a School-Based Mindfulness Programme (Paws b) on Empathy and Prosocial Behaviour: A Randomised Controlled Trial\",\"authors\":\"Katie Crompton, Daphne Kaklamanou, Alessandra Fasulo, Eszter Somogyi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12671-024-02345-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Objectives</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of a school-based mindfulness programme (SBMP), “Paws b”, on empathy and prosocial behaviour among children aged 7 to 10 years in a school setting.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Method</h3><p>This multi-informant design, randomised controlled trial compared an intervention group to a wait-list control group, involving 133 children aged 7- to 10 years from 10 classrooms. Outcome measures were taken at pre-intervention, post-intervention, and 3-month follow-up and included self-reports of mindfulness and empathy, a sharing task, teacher and peer reports of prosocial behaviours, and sociometry measures.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>Children in the intervention group were voted as significantly more (a) prosocial by teachers <i>F</i>(1, 127) = 7.35,<i> p</i> = 0.008,<i> η</i><sup><i>2</i></sup> = 0.055, (b) helpful by peers, <i>F</i>(1, 127) = 9.369, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.003, <i>η</i><sup><i>2</i></sup> = 0.069, (c) popular by peers, <i>F</i>(1, 127) = 4.90, <i>p</i> = 0.028, <i>η</i><sup><i>2</i></sup> = 0.037, and (d) showed more reciprocal relationships, <i>t</i>(8) = 2.518, <i>p</i> = 0.036, compared to the wait-list control group. The intervention did not have an effect on mindfulness scores, empathy scores (affective, cognitive, or intention to comfort), or sharing task scores.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusions</h3><p>Findings suggest that, for 7–10-year-olds, the SBMP, Paws b, delivered by a mindfulness teacher, can increase some aspects of prosociality, as judged by peers and teachers, but has no effect on self-assessed empathy.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Preregistration</h3><p>This study was preregistered on the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/vm6tp/) on 31.10.2022.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18523,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mindfulness\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mindfulness\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-024-02345-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mindfulness","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-024-02345-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在考察校本正念计划(SBMP)"Paws b "对学校环境中 7 至 10 岁儿童移情和亲社会行为的影响。方法这项多信息设计随机对照试验比较了干预组和等待对照组,共有来自 10 个班级的 133 名 7 至 10 岁儿童参加。结果测量在干预前、干预后和 3 个月随访时进行,包括正念和移情的自我报告、分享任务、教师和同伴对亲社会行为的报告以及社会测量。35,p = 0.008,η2 = 0.055;(b) 更受同伴欢迎,F(1, 127) = 9.369,p < 0.003,η2 = 0.069;(c) 更受同伴欢迎,F(1, 127) = 4.90,p = 0.028,η2 = 0.037;(d) 表现出更多互惠关系,t(8) = 2.518,p = 0.036。结论研究结果表明,对于7-10岁的儿童来说,由正念教师提供的SBMP "Paws b "可以提高由同伴和教师评判的亲社会性的某些方面,但对自我评估的共情没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The Effects of a School-Based Mindfulness Programme (Paws b) on Empathy and Prosocial Behaviour: A Randomised Controlled Trial

The Effects of a School-Based Mindfulness Programme (Paws b) on Empathy and Prosocial Behaviour: A Randomised Controlled Trial

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of a school-based mindfulness programme (SBMP), “Paws b”, on empathy and prosocial behaviour among children aged 7 to 10 years in a school setting.

Method

This multi-informant design, randomised controlled trial compared an intervention group to a wait-list control group, involving 133 children aged 7- to 10 years from 10 classrooms. Outcome measures were taken at pre-intervention, post-intervention, and 3-month follow-up and included self-reports of mindfulness and empathy, a sharing task, teacher and peer reports of prosocial behaviours, and sociometry measures.

Results

Children in the intervention group were voted as significantly more (a) prosocial by teachers F(1, 127) = 7.35, p = 0.008, η2 = 0.055, (b) helpful by peers, F(1, 127) = 9.369, p < 0.003, η2 = 0.069, (c) popular by peers, F(1, 127) = 4.90, p = 0.028, η2 = 0.037, and (d) showed more reciprocal relationships, t(8) = 2.518, p = 0.036, compared to the wait-list control group. The intervention did not have an effect on mindfulness scores, empathy scores (affective, cognitive, or intention to comfort), or sharing task scores.

Conclusions

Findings suggest that, for 7–10-year-olds, the SBMP, Paws b, delivered by a mindfulness teacher, can increase some aspects of prosociality, as judged by peers and teachers, but has no effect on self-assessed empathy.

Preregistration

This study was preregistered on the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/vm6tp/) on 31.10.2022.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Mindfulness
Mindfulness Multiple-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
19.40%
发文量
224
期刊介绍: Mindfulness seeks to advance research, clinical practice, and theory on mindfulness. It is interested in manuscripts from diverse viewpoints, including psychology, psychiatry, medicine, neurobiology, psychoneuroendocrinology, cognitive, behavioral, cultural, philosophy, spirituality, and wisdom traditions. Mindfulness encourages research submissions on the reliability and validity of assessment of mindfulness; clinical uses of mindfulness in psychological distress, psychiatric disorders, and medical conditions; alleviation of personal and societal suffering; the nature and foundations of mindfulness; mechanisms of action; and the use of mindfulness across cultures. The Journal also seeks to promote the use of mindfulness by publishing scholarly papers on the training of clinicians, institutional staff, teachers, parents, and industry personnel in mindful provision of services. Examples of topics include: Mindfulness-based psycho-educational interventions for children with learning, emotional, and behavioral disorders Treating depression and clinical symptoms in patients with chronic heart failure Yoga and mindfulness Cognitive-behavioral mindfulness group therapy interventions Mindfulnessness and emotional regulation difficulties in children Loving-kindness meditation to increase social connectedness Training for parents and children with ADHD Recovery from substance abuse Changing parents’ mindfulness Child management skills Treating childhood anxiety and depression
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信