全面探讨教育工作者的人工智能能力框架:批判性评论

IF 2.8 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Tamar Mikeladze, Paulien C. Meijer, Roald P. Verhoeff
{"title":"全面探讨教育工作者的人工智能能力框架:批判性评论","authors":"Tamar Mikeladze,&nbsp;Paulien C. Meijer,&nbsp;Roald P. Verhoeff","doi":"10.1111/ejed.12663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Recent literature underscores the need for teachers to develop AI competencies with a recognition of the current lack of well-defined competence frameworks. This critical review investigates teachers' Artificial Intelligence (AI) competence frameworks (AI CFTs), analysing their strengths, weaknesses and practical applications for researchers, educators and policymakers. It identifies five distinct types of AI CFTs within Competence Construct Claims (Child, S., &amp; Shaw, S. 2023). A conceptual approach to validating competence frameworks. <i>Research Matters: A Cambridge University Press &amp; Assessment publication, 35</i>, 27–40.), each addressing the complexities of AI in its early stages. Notably, frameworks derived from empirical data offer detailed descriptions of competencies, while those based on conceptual models provide broader overviews. Highlighting the need for further empirical research, this review helps identify and understand existing approaches to teacher AI competence development and paves the way for integrating AI CFTs into teacher education, ultimately enhancing educators' preparedness to harness AI in their teaching practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":47585,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejed.12663","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comprehensive exploration of artificial intelligence competence frameworks for educators: A critical review\",\"authors\":\"Tamar Mikeladze,&nbsp;Paulien C. Meijer,&nbsp;Roald P. Verhoeff\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ejed.12663\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Recent literature underscores the need for teachers to develop AI competencies with a recognition of the current lack of well-defined competence frameworks. This critical review investigates teachers' Artificial Intelligence (AI) competence frameworks (AI CFTs), analysing their strengths, weaknesses and practical applications for researchers, educators and policymakers. It identifies five distinct types of AI CFTs within Competence Construct Claims (Child, S., &amp; Shaw, S. 2023). A conceptual approach to validating competence frameworks. <i>Research Matters: A Cambridge University Press &amp; Assessment publication, 35</i>, 27–40.), each addressing the complexities of AI in its early stages. Notably, frameworks derived from empirical data offer detailed descriptions of competencies, while those based on conceptual models provide broader overviews. Highlighting the need for further empirical research, this review helps identify and understand existing approaches to teacher AI competence development and paves the way for integrating AI CFTs into teacher education, ultimately enhancing educators' preparedness to harness AI in their teaching practices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47585,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejed.12663\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejed.12663\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejed.12663","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近的文献强调了教师发展人工智能能力的必要性,并认识到目前缺乏定义明确的能力框架。本评论对教师的人工智能(AI)能力框架(AI CFTs)进行了研究,分析了它们的优点、缺点以及对研究者、教育者和决策者的实际应用。它在能力结构主张(Child, S., & Shaw, S. 2023)中确定了五种不同类型的人工智能能力框架。验证能力框架的概念方法》。研究事项:A Cambridge University Press & Assessment publication, 35, 27-40.),每个框架都能解决人工智能早期阶段的复杂问题。值得注意的是,源自经验数据的框架提供了能力的详细描述,而基于概念模型的框架则提供了更广泛的概述。本综述强调了进一步实证研究的必要性,有助于确定和理解教师人工智能能力发展的现有方法,并为将人工智能能力框架纳入教师教育铺平道路,最终提高教育者在教学实践中驾驭人工智能的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A comprehensive exploration of artificial intelligence competence frameworks for educators: A critical review

A comprehensive exploration of artificial intelligence competence frameworks for educators: A critical review

Recent literature underscores the need for teachers to develop AI competencies with a recognition of the current lack of well-defined competence frameworks. This critical review investigates teachers' Artificial Intelligence (AI) competence frameworks (AI CFTs), analysing their strengths, weaknesses and practical applications for researchers, educators and policymakers. It identifies five distinct types of AI CFTs within Competence Construct Claims (Child, S., & Shaw, S. 2023). A conceptual approach to validating competence frameworks. Research Matters: A Cambridge University Press & Assessment publication, 35, 27–40.), each addressing the complexities of AI in its early stages. Notably, frameworks derived from empirical data offer detailed descriptions of competencies, while those based on conceptual models provide broader overviews. Highlighting the need for further empirical research, this review helps identify and understand existing approaches to teacher AI competence development and paves the way for integrating AI CFTs into teacher education, ultimately enhancing educators' preparedness to harness AI in their teaching practices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Education
European Journal of Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: The prime aims of the European Journal of Education are: - To examine, compare and assess education policies, trends, reforms and programmes of European countries in an international perspective - To disseminate policy debates and research results to a wide audience of academics, researchers, practitioners and students of education sciences - To contribute to the policy debate at the national and European level by providing European administrators and policy-makers in international organisations, national and local governments with comparative and up-to-date material centred on specific themes of common interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信