Noam Tau , Marin Moutel , Maiwenn Petithomme-Nanrocki , Maxime Hentzien , Dafna Yahav
{"title":"开放获取状态对传染病学和临床微生物学期刊指标的影响--一项横断面研究","authors":"Noam Tau , Marin Moutel , Maiwenn Petithomme-Nanrocki , Maxime Hentzien , Dafna Yahav","doi":"10.1016/j.idnow.2024.104909","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>While Open Access (OA) journals provide free access to articles, they entail high article processing charges (APC), limiting opportunities for young researchers and those from low-middle income countries to publish OA.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Cross-sectional study, evaluating APC and academic impact of full OA (FOA) journals in infectious diseases (ID) and clinical microbiology (CM) compared to hybrid journals. Data were collected from Journal Citation Reports and journals’ websites.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among 255 journals, median APC was 2850 (interquartile range [IQR] 1325–3654$). Median APC for 120 FOA journals was significantly lower than for 119 hybrid journals (2000, IQR 648–2767$ versus 3550, IQR 2948–4120$, p < 0.001). FOA journals had lower citation numbers and impact metrics compared to hybrid journals.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>While FOA ID/CM journals have lower APCs, they also lower academic impact compared to hybrid journals. These findings highlight the need for reforms in the publication process in view of achieving equitable data dissemination.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":13539,"journal":{"name":"Infectious diseases now","volume":"54 4","pages":"Article 104909"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666991924000642/pdfft?md5=547c21cbce0d039bd70bb4525b89de05&pid=1-s2.0-S2666991924000642-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Open Access status on journal metrics in infectious diseases and clinical microbiology – A cross-sectional study\",\"authors\":\"Noam Tau , Marin Moutel , Maiwenn Petithomme-Nanrocki , Maxime Hentzien , Dafna Yahav\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.idnow.2024.104909\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>While Open Access (OA) journals provide free access to articles, they entail high article processing charges (APC), limiting opportunities for young researchers and those from low-middle income countries to publish OA.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Cross-sectional study, evaluating APC and academic impact of full OA (FOA) journals in infectious diseases (ID) and clinical microbiology (CM) compared to hybrid journals. Data were collected from Journal Citation Reports and journals’ websites.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among 255 journals, median APC was 2850 (interquartile range [IQR] 1325–3654$). Median APC for 120 FOA journals was significantly lower than for 119 hybrid journals (2000, IQR 648–2767$ versus 3550, IQR 2948–4120$, p < 0.001). FOA journals had lower citation numbers and impact metrics compared to hybrid journals.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>While FOA ID/CM journals have lower APCs, they also lower academic impact compared to hybrid journals. These findings highlight the need for reforms in the publication process in view of achieving equitable data dissemination.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13539,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infectious diseases now\",\"volume\":\"54 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 104909\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666991924000642/pdfft?md5=547c21cbce0d039bd70bb4525b89de05&pid=1-s2.0-S2666991924000642-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infectious diseases now\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666991924000642\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious diseases now","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666991924000642","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impact of Open Access status on journal metrics in infectious diseases and clinical microbiology – A cross-sectional study
Introduction
While Open Access (OA) journals provide free access to articles, they entail high article processing charges (APC), limiting opportunities for young researchers and those from low-middle income countries to publish OA.
Methods
Cross-sectional study, evaluating APC and academic impact of full OA (FOA) journals in infectious diseases (ID) and clinical microbiology (CM) compared to hybrid journals. Data were collected from Journal Citation Reports and journals’ websites.
Results
Among 255 journals, median APC was 2850 (interquartile range [IQR] 1325–3654$). Median APC for 120 FOA journals was significantly lower than for 119 hybrid journals (2000, IQR 648–2767$ versus 3550, IQR 2948–4120$, p < 0.001). FOA journals had lower citation numbers and impact metrics compared to hybrid journals.
Conclusion
While FOA ID/CM journals have lower APCs, they also lower academic impact compared to hybrid journals. These findings highlight the need for reforms in the publication process in view of achieving equitable data dissemination.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
