利用瘤胃模拟技术(RUSITEC)研究精油混合物和富马酸对瘤胃发酵、挥发性脂肪酸产生和温室气体排放的协同效应

Joel O. Alabi, P. Dele, Deborah O. Okedoyin, Michael Wuaku, Chika C. Anotaenwere, Oludotun O. Adelusi, DeAndrea Gray, K. Ike, O. Oderinwale, Kiran Subedi, U. Anele
{"title":"利用瘤胃模拟技术(RUSITEC)研究精油混合物和富马酸对瘤胃发酵、挥发性脂肪酸产生和温室气体排放的协同效应","authors":"Joel O. Alabi, P. Dele, Deborah O. Okedoyin, Michael Wuaku, Chika C. Anotaenwere, Oludotun O. Adelusi, DeAndrea Gray, K. Ike, O. Oderinwale, Kiran Subedi, U. Anele","doi":"10.3390/fermentation10020114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigated the combined impact of essential oil blends (EOBs) and fumaric acid (FA) on ruminal fermentation in dairy cows using the rumen simulation technique (RUSITEC) system. Three rumen-cannulated, non-lactating Holstein Friesian cows served as inoculum donors. The substrate, a total mixed ration (TMR), comprised corn silage, alfalfa hay, and a concentrate mix in a 3:1:1 ratio. The four treatments evaluated were Control (TMR without additives), EFA1 (TMR + EOB1 + FA), EFA2 (TMR + EOB2 + FA), and EFA3 (TMR + EOB3 + FA). Sixteen fermentation chambers were randomly assigned to the treatments, each with four replicates, following a completely randomized design during a 9-day experimental period. EOBs and FA were added at 10 µL/g feed and 3% of TMR, respectively. After a 4-day adaptation, samples were collected for 5 days. Results revealed that EFA1 significantly reduced (p = 0.0351) CH4 emissions by 60.2% without negatively impacting dry matter disappearance, fiber fraction digestibility, pH, or gas volume. All EFAs increased (p < 0.001) the propionate molar proportion and decreased (p < 0.001) the acetate-to-propionate ratio. EFA2 decreased (p < 0.05) the acetate proportion by 3.3% compared to the control. In conclusion, EFA1 is recommended as an effective nutritional intervention to mitigate CH4 emissions and optimize ruminal fermentation in dairy cows.","PeriodicalId":12379,"journal":{"name":"Fermentation","volume":"12 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Synergistic Effects of Essential Oil Blends and Fumaric Acid on Ruminal Fermentation, Volatile Fatty Acid Production and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Using the Rumen Simulation Technique (RUSITEC)\",\"authors\":\"Joel O. Alabi, P. Dele, Deborah O. Okedoyin, Michael Wuaku, Chika C. Anotaenwere, Oludotun O. Adelusi, DeAndrea Gray, K. Ike, O. Oderinwale, Kiran Subedi, U. Anele\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/fermentation10020114\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study investigated the combined impact of essential oil blends (EOBs) and fumaric acid (FA) on ruminal fermentation in dairy cows using the rumen simulation technique (RUSITEC) system. Three rumen-cannulated, non-lactating Holstein Friesian cows served as inoculum donors. The substrate, a total mixed ration (TMR), comprised corn silage, alfalfa hay, and a concentrate mix in a 3:1:1 ratio. The four treatments evaluated were Control (TMR without additives), EFA1 (TMR + EOB1 + FA), EFA2 (TMR + EOB2 + FA), and EFA3 (TMR + EOB3 + FA). Sixteen fermentation chambers were randomly assigned to the treatments, each with four replicates, following a completely randomized design during a 9-day experimental period. EOBs and FA were added at 10 µL/g feed and 3% of TMR, respectively. After a 4-day adaptation, samples were collected for 5 days. Results revealed that EFA1 significantly reduced (p = 0.0351) CH4 emissions by 60.2% without negatively impacting dry matter disappearance, fiber fraction digestibility, pH, or gas volume. All EFAs increased (p < 0.001) the propionate molar proportion and decreased (p < 0.001) the acetate-to-propionate ratio. EFA2 decreased (p < 0.05) the acetate proportion by 3.3% compared to the control. In conclusion, EFA1 is recommended as an effective nutritional intervention to mitigate CH4 emissions and optimize ruminal fermentation in dairy cows.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12379,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fermentation\",\"volume\":\"12 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fermentation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10020114\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fermentation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10020114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究利用瘤胃模拟技术(RUSITEC)系统研究了精油混合物(EOB)和富马酸(FA)对奶牛瘤胃发酵的综合影响。三头经瘤胃封存的非哺乳荷斯坦弗里斯兰奶牛作为接种物供体。基质是全混合日粮(TMR),由玉米青贮、苜蓿干草和精料按 3:1:1 的比例混合而成。评估的四种处理分别是对照组(不含添加剂的 TMR)、EFA1(TMR + EOB1 + FA)、EFA2(TMR + EOB2 + FA)和 EFA3(TMR + EOB3 + FA)。在为期 9 天的实验期间,按照完全随机设计将 16 个发酵室随机分配到各处理中,每个处理有 4 个重复。EOB 和 FA 的添加量分别为 10 µL/g 饲料和 TMR 的 3%。经过 4 天的适应期后,收集 5 天的样品。结果表明,EFA1 可显著减少(p = 0.0351)60.2%的甲烷排放量,而不会对干物质消失、纤维部分消化率、pH 值或气体体积产生负面影响。所有 EFAs 都能提高(p < 0.001)醋酸酯摩尔比例,降低(p < 0.001)醋酸酯与丙酸酯的比例。与对照组相比,EFA2 使乙酸酯比例降低了 3.3%(p < 0.05)。总之,建议将 EFA1 作为一种有效的营养干预措施,以减少奶牛的甲烷排放量并优化瘤胃发酵。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Synergistic Effects of Essential Oil Blends and Fumaric Acid on Ruminal Fermentation, Volatile Fatty Acid Production and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Using the Rumen Simulation Technique (RUSITEC)
This study investigated the combined impact of essential oil blends (EOBs) and fumaric acid (FA) on ruminal fermentation in dairy cows using the rumen simulation technique (RUSITEC) system. Three rumen-cannulated, non-lactating Holstein Friesian cows served as inoculum donors. The substrate, a total mixed ration (TMR), comprised corn silage, alfalfa hay, and a concentrate mix in a 3:1:1 ratio. The four treatments evaluated were Control (TMR without additives), EFA1 (TMR + EOB1 + FA), EFA2 (TMR + EOB2 + FA), and EFA3 (TMR + EOB3 + FA). Sixteen fermentation chambers were randomly assigned to the treatments, each with four replicates, following a completely randomized design during a 9-day experimental period. EOBs and FA were added at 10 µL/g feed and 3% of TMR, respectively. After a 4-day adaptation, samples were collected for 5 days. Results revealed that EFA1 significantly reduced (p = 0.0351) CH4 emissions by 60.2% without negatively impacting dry matter disappearance, fiber fraction digestibility, pH, or gas volume. All EFAs increased (p < 0.001) the propionate molar proportion and decreased (p < 0.001) the acetate-to-propionate ratio. EFA2 decreased (p < 0.05) the acetate proportion by 3.3% compared to the control. In conclusion, EFA1 is recommended as an effective nutritional intervention to mitigate CH4 emissions and optimize ruminal fermentation in dairy cows.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信