管理研究评论中的方法严谨性

IF 9.3 1区管理学 Q1 BUSINESS

Journal of Management Pub Date : 2024-03-29 DOI:10.1177/01492063241237222

Zeki Simsek, Brian C Fox, Ciaran Heavey, Shuang Liu

{"title":"管理研究评论中的方法严谨性","authors":"Zeki Simsek, Brian C Fox, Ciaran Heavey, Shuang Liu","doi":"10.1177/01492063241237222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Review research in management, like other research traditions, demands a methodological compass to advance coherent and credible knowledge claims. Yet, the established landscape of review research lacks a common framework for guiding and assessing its methodological rigor. We conducted an exploratory scoping review, analyzing a large sample of review articles published in the Journal of Management. The review focuses on reported practices dealing with five themes embedded within all review articles: their purpose, type, design, execution, and internal alignment. By comprehensively examining manifest practices, the review reveals crucial insights into the progress and evolving methods employed in management research reviews. Synthesizing those insights with existing conceptions of rigor, we present a conceptual framework including promising research directions on the methodological rigor of review articles.","PeriodicalId":54212,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Management","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Methodological Rigor in Management Research Reviews\",\"authors\":\"Zeki Simsek, Brian C Fox, Ciaran Heavey, Shuang Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/01492063241237222\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Review research in management, like other research traditions, demands a methodological compass to advance coherent and credible knowledge claims. Yet, the established landscape of review research lacks a common framework for guiding and assessing its methodological rigor. We conducted an exploratory scoping review, analyzing a large sample of review articles published in the Journal of Management. The review focuses on reported practices dealing with five themes embedded within all review articles: their purpose, type, design, execution, and internal alignment. By comprehensively examining manifest practices, the review reveals crucial insights into the progress and evolving methods employed in management research reviews. Synthesizing those insights with existing conceptions of rigor, we present a conceptual framework including promising research directions on the methodological rigor of review articles.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54212,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Management\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063241237222\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063241237222","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

管理学评论研究与其他研究传统一样，需要一个方法指南，以推进连贯、可信的知识主张。然而，评论研究的现有格局缺乏一个共同的框架来指导和评估其方法的严谨性。我们进行了一次探索性的范围界定综述，分析了《管理杂志》上发表的大量综述文章样本。综述的重点是所报道的实践，涉及所有综述文章的五个主题：目的、类型、设计、执行和内部协调。通过全面研究显性实践，综述揭示了管理研究综述所采用的进展和演变方法的重要见解。将这些见解与现有的严谨性概念相结合，我们提出了一个概念框架，其中包括关于评论文章方法严谨性的有前途的研究方向。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Methodological Rigor in Management Research Reviews

Review research in management, like other research traditions, demands a methodological compass to advance coherent and credible knowledge claims. Yet, the established landscape of review research lacks a common framework for guiding and assessing its methodological rigor. We conducted an exploratory scoping review, analyzing a large sample of review articles published in the Journal of Management. The review focuses on reported practices dealing with five themes embedded within all review articles: their purpose, type, design, execution, and internal alignment. By comprehensively examining manifest practices, the review reveals crucial insights into the progress and evolving methods employed in management research reviews. Synthesizing those insights with existing conceptions of rigor, we present a conceptual framework including promising research directions on the methodological rigor of review articles.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Management Multiple-

CiteScore

22.40

自引率

5.20%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Management (JOM) aims to publish rigorous empirical and theoretical research articles that significantly contribute to the field of management. It is particularly interested in papers that have a strong impact on the overall management discipline. JOM also encourages the submission of novel ideas and fresh perspectives on existing research. The journal covers a wide range of areas, including business strategy and policy, organizational behavior, human resource management, organizational theory, entrepreneurship, and research methods. It provides a platform for scholars to present their work on these topics and fosters intellectual discussion and exchange in these areas.