经验丰富的从业者对正念的概念理解

IF 3.1 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Jonah Lustig, LeeAnn Cardaciotto, Simon Moon, Megan Spokas
{"title":"经验丰富的从业者对正念的概念理解","authors":"Jonah Lustig, LeeAnn Cardaciotto, Simon Moon, Megan Spokas","doi":"10.1007/s12671-024-02339-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Objectives</h3><p>Despite ongoing interest in the study of mindfulness, there remain differences in the way the construct is defined in research, with some questioning whether current definitions are reflective of experienced practitioners’ understandings, including those from Buddhist backgrounds. The present study sought to investigate how experienced mindfulness practitioners define mindfulness and how they evaluate 13 definitions of mindfulness found in research and historical sources.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Method</h3><p>One hundred thirty-four participants, with an average of 20.3 years of mindfulness practice experience, completed an original online survey. Participants were first asked to provide their own definition of mindfulness in an open-ended format, then to evaluate how consistent 13 established research and historical definitions of mindfulness were with their own understanding. An exploratory mixed-methods data analytic approach was used to identify areas of agreement and disagreement between experienced practitioners’ and researchers’ conceptualizations.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Results revealed common language used to describe mindfulness: Both experienced practitioners and the established definitions included terms such as <i>attention</i>, <i>awareness</i>, and <i>present moment</i>. On average, participants rated most of the definitions from research and historical sources as at least <i>slightly consistent</i> (5 out of 7 on a Likert scale) with their own understanding. Conceptual disagreements by the experienced practitioners were observed related to a possible overemphasis on present-moment focus, whether mindfulness is best conceptualized as a state and/or a trait, and Buddhist concepts which may be missing from researchers’ definitions.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>While the present study demonstrated broad general agreement in understandings of mindfulness among experienced practitioners and researchers, future research is needed to account for specific differences in understandings to work toward more comprehensive operational definitions of mindfulness.</p>","PeriodicalId":18523,"journal":{"name":"Mindfulness","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conceptualizations of Mindfulness Among Experienced Practitioners\",\"authors\":\"Jonah Lustig, LeeAnn Cardaciotto, Simon Moon, Megan Spokas\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12671-024-02339-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Objectives</h3><p>Despite ongoing interest in the study of mindfulness, there remain differences in the way the construct is defined in research, with some questioning whether current definitions are reflective of experienced practitioners’ understandings, including those from Buddhist backgrounds. The present study sought to investigate how experienced mindfulness practitioners define mindfulness and how they evaluate 13 definitions of mindfulness found in research and historical sources.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Method</h3><p>One hundred thirty-four participants, with an average of 20.3 years of mindfulness practice experience, completed an original online survey. Participants were first asked to provide their own definition of mindfulness in an open-ended format, then to evaluate how consistent 13 established research and historical definitions of mindfulness were with their own understanding. An exploratory mixed-methods data analytic approach was used to identify areas of agreement and disagreement between experienced practitioners’ and researchers’ conceptualizations.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>Results revealed common language used to describe mindfulness: Both experienced practitioners and the established definitions included terms such as <i>attention</i>, <i>awareness</i>, and <i>present moment</i>. On average, participants rated most of the definitions from research and historical sources as at least <i>slightly consistent</i> (5 out of 7 on a Likert scale) with their own understanding. Conceptual disagreements by the experienced practitioners were observed related to a possible overemphasis on present-moment focus, whether mindfulness is best conceptualized as a state and/or a trait, and Buddhist concepts which may be missing from researchers’ definitions.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusions</h3><p>While the present study demonstrated broad general agreement in understandings of mindfulness among experienced practitioners and researchers, future research is needed to account for specific differences in understandings to work toward more comprehensive operational definitions of mindfulness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18523,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mindfulness\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mindfulness\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-024-02339-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mindfulness","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-024-02339-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的尽管人们对正念的研究一直很感兴趣,但研究中对正念的定义仍然存在差异,有人质疑目前的定义是否反映了经验丰富的正念练习者(包括佛教背景的练习者)的理解。本研究试图调查经验丰富的正念修习者是如何定义正念的,以及他们是如何评价研究和历史资料中关于正念的 13 个定义的。方法 134 名参与者完成了一项原创在线调查,他们平均拥有 20.3 年的正念修习经验。调查首先要求参与者以开放式的形式提供他们自己对正念的定义,然后让他们评价 13 个已确立的正念研究和历史定义与他们自己的理解的一致性。我们采用了一种探索性的混合方法数据分析方法,以确定经验丰富的实践者和研究人员的概念之间的一致和不一致之处:经验丰富的实践者和既定的定义都包括注意力、意识和当下等术语。平均而言,参与者认为研究和历史资料中的大多数定义至少与他们自己的理解略有一致(李克特量表 7 分制,满分为 5 分)。经验丰富的正念实践者在概念上存在分歧,这些分歧涉及可能过分强调当下的专注、正念是否最好被概念化为一种状态和/或特质,以及研究人员的定义中可能缺少的佛教概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Conceptualizations of Mindfulness Among Experienced Practitioners

Objectives

Despite ongoing interest in the study of mindfulness, there remain differences in the way the construct is defined in research, with some questioning whether current definitions are reflective of experienced practitioners’ understandings, including those from Buddhist backgrounds. The present study sought to investigate how experienced mindfulness practitioners define mindfulness and how they evaluate 13 definitions of mindfulness found in research and historical sources.

Method

One hundred thirty-four participants, with an average of 20.3 years of mindfulness practice experience, completed an original online survey. Participants were first asked to provide their own definition of mindfulness in an open-ended format, then to evaluate how consistent 13 established research and historical definitions of mindfulness were with their own understanding. An exploratory mixed-methods data analytic approach was used to identify areas of agreement and disagreement between experienced practitioners’ and researchers’ conceptualizations.

Results

Results revealed common language used to describe mindfulness: Both experienced practitioners and the established definitions included terms such as attention, awareness, and present moment. On average, participants rated most of the definitions from research and historical sources as at least slightly consistent (5 out of 7 on a Likert scale) with their own understanding. Conceptual disagreements by the experienced practitioners were observed related to a possible overemphasis on present-moment focus, whether mindfulness is best conceptualized as a state and/or a trait, and Buddhist concepts which may be missing from researchers’ definitions.

Conclusions

While the present study demonstrated broad general agreement in understandings of mindfulness among experienced practitioners and researchers, future research is needed to account for specific differences in understandings to work toward more comprehensive operational definitions of mindfulness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Mindfulness
Mindfulness Multiple-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
19.40%
发文量
224
期刊介绍: Mindfulness seeks to advance research, clinical practice, and theory on mindfulness. It is interested in manuscripts from diverse viewpoints, including psychology, psychiatry, medicine, neurobiology, psychoneuroendocrinology, cognitive, behavioral, cultural, philosophy, spirituality, and wisdom traditions. Mindfulness encourages research submissions on the reliability and validity of assessment of mindfulness; clinical uses of mindfulness in psychological distress, psychiatric disorders, and medical conditions; alleviation of personal and societal suffering; the nature and foundations of mindfulness; mechanisms of action; and the use of mindfulness across cultures. The Journal also seeks to promote the use of mindfulness by publishing scholarly papers on the training of clinicians, institutional staff, teachers, parents, and industry personnel in mindful provision of services. Examples of topics include: Mindfulness-based psycho-educational interventions for children with learning, emotional, and behavioral disorders Treating depression and clinical symptoms in patients with chronic heart failure Yoga and mindfulness Cognitive-behavioral mindfulness group therapy interventions Mindfulnessness and emotional regulation difficulties in children Loving-kindness meditation to increase social connectedness Training for parents and children with ADHD Recovery from substance abuse Changing parents’ mindfulness Child management skills Treating childhood anxiety and depression
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信