细胞病理学中的观察者间差异:我们的共识有多大?

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 CELL BIOLOGY
Cytopathology Pub Date : 2024-03-27 DOI:10.1111/cyt.13378
Gennaro Acanfora, Anna Maria Carillo, Filippo Dello Iacovo, Maria Salatiello, Pasquale Pisapia, Claudio Bellevicine, Giancarlo Troncone, Elena Vigliar
{"title":"细胞病理学中的观察者间差异:我们的共识有多大?","authors":"Gennaro Acanfora,&nbsp;Anna Maria Carillo,&nbsp;Filippo Dello Iacovo,&nbsp;Maria Salatiello,&nbsp;Pasquale Pisapia,&nbsp;Claudio Bellevicine,&nbsp;Giancarlo Troncone,&nbsp;Elena Vigliar","doi":"10.1111/cyt.13378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Interobserver variability remains a major challenge for cytopathologists despite the development of standardized reporting and classification systems. Indeed, whereas moderate-to-good interobserver agreement is generally achievable when the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant entities is straightforward, high levels of variability make the diagnostic interpretation of atypical and suspicious samples not consistent. This review explores the landscape of interobserver agreement in cytopathology across different anatomical sites.</p>","PeriodicalId":55187,"journal":{"name":"Cytopathology","volume":"35 4","pages":"444-453"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interobserver variability in cytopathology: How much do we agree?\",\"authors\":\"Gennaro Acanfora,&nbsp;Anna Maria Carillo,&nbsp;Filippo Dello Iacovo,&nbsp;Maria Salatiello,&nbsp;Pasquale Pisapia,&nbsp;Claudio Bellevicine,&nbsp;Giancarlo Troncone,&nbsp;Elena Vigliar\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cyt.13378\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Interobserver variability remains a major challenge for cytopathologists despite the development of standardized reporting and classification systems. Indeed, whereas moderate-to-good interobserver agreement is generally achievable when the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant entities is straightforward, high levels of variability make the diagnostic interpretation of atypical and suspicious samples not consistent. This review explores the landscape of interobserver agreement in cytopathology across different anatomical sites.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55187,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cytopathology\",\"volume\":\"35 4\",\"pages\":\"444-453\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cytopathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cyt.13378\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CELL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cytopathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cyt.13378","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管开发了标准化的报告和分类系统,但观察者之间的变异性仍是细胞病理学家面临的一大挑战。事实上,当良性和恶性实体之间的鉴别诊断简单明了时,观察者之间的一致性一般都能达到中等到良好的水平,而高水平的变异性则使对不典型和可疑样本的诊断解释不一致。本综述探讨了不同解剖部位细胞病理学的观察者间一致性状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Interobserver variability in cytopathology: How much do we agree?

Interobserver variability in cytopathology: How much do we agree?

Interobserver variability in cytopathology: How much do we agree?

Interobserver variability remains a major challenge for cytopathologists despite the development of standardized reporting and classification systems. Indeed, whereas moderate-to-good interobserver agreement is generally achievable when the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant entities is straightforward, high levels of variability make the diagnostic interpretation of atypical and suspicious samples not consistent. This review explores the landscape of interobserver agreement in cytopathology across different anatomical sites.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cytopathology
Cytopathology 生物-病理学
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
107
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of Cytopathology is to publish articles relating to those aspects of cytology which will increase our knowledge and understanding of the aetiology, diagnosis and management of human disease. It contains original articles and critical reviews on all aspects of clinical cytology in its broadest sense, including: gynaecological and non-gynaecological cytology; fine needle aspiration and screening strategy. Cytopathology welcomes papers and articles on: ultrastructural, histochemical and immunocytochemical studies of the cell; quantitative cytology and DNA hybridization as applied to cytological material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信